Remedying Education with Personalized Homework: Evidence from a Randomized Field Experiment in India

Anuj Kumar, Amit Mehra
{"title":"Remedying Education with Personalized Homework: Evidence from a Randomized Field Experiment in India","authors":"Anuj Kumar, Amit Mehra","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.2756059","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Can Information and Communication Technology (ICT) enabled personalization remedy the educational production in resource-strapped schooling systems? We conduct a randomized field experiment on a group of residential schools in Hyderabad India to examine this question. In a school setting, students first learn concepts through class room instructions and then reinforce their learning by doing homework. In our experiment, students were first taught different topics in mathematics through classroom instructions, and then a randomly selected one half of them were assigned computer-generated adaptive homework (CGAHW) and the other half were offered paper-based traditional homework (PBTHW). In a PBTHW, a pre-decided fixed number of easy and hard questions were offered from different topics. In a CGAHW, first half of the total questions were offered in the easy category, and based on a student’s performance on these questions, later questions were adaptively generated such that: (1) more questions were offered on the topics in which student incorrectly answered questions and (2) hard questions on a topic were offered when the student correctly answered easy questions on that topic. Thus, while all PBTHW students received the same number of easy and hard questions on different topics, CGAHW students received different numbers and difficulty levels of questions on different topics based on their individual learning needs. A total of 50 homework in each category were offered to students between October 2014 and April 2015, and their learning was assessed in two standardized exams offered in this period.We found that CGAHW students on average obtained lower homework scores than PBTHW students, but they obtained 4.28 percent higher scores in exams than PBTHW students. Lower homework scores could be attributed to students receiving more questions in their weak areas in CGAHW. However, by doing more questions in their weak areas and less in their strong areas, students achieved personalized learning in CGAHW, and hence obtained higher exam scores. To provide evidence that personalized learning in CGAHW resulted in improvement in their exam scores, we show that students that were offered higher levels of personalization in CGAHW, obtained higher exam scores. To further understand the differential effect of CGAHW on students of different abilities, we categorized students in low, medium, and high categories of ability based on their mathematics scores in standardized exams at the beginning of experiment. We found that personalized learning through CGAHW helped the students in low and medium ability categories but not in high ability category. Overall, we developed and deployed an adaptive homework generation application in a field set up to show how ICT-enabled personalized learning could improve educational production with existing school resources.","PeriodicalId":153695,"journal":{"name":"Cognition in Mathematics","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-04-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cognition in Mathematics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2756059","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

Can Information and Communication Technology (ICT) enabled personalization remedy the educational production in resource-strapped schooling systems? We conduct a randomized field experiment on a group of residential schools in Hyderabad India to examine this question. In a school setting, students first learn concepts through class room instructions and then reinforce their learning by doing homework. In our experiment, students were first taught different topics in mathematics through classroom instructions, and then a randomly selected one half of them were assigned computer-generated adaptive homework (CGAHW) and the other half were offered paper-based traditional homework (PBTHW). In a PBTHW, a pre-decided fixed number of easy and hard questions were offered from different topics. In a CGAHW, first half of the total questions were offered in the easy category, and based on a student’s performance on these questions, later questions were adaptively generated such that: (1) more questions were offered on the topics in which student incorrectly answered questions and (2) hard questions on a topic were offered when the student correctly answered easy questions on that topic. Thus, while all PBTHW students received the same number of easy and hard questions on different topics, CGAHW students received different numbers and difficulty levels of questions on different topics based on their individual learning needs. A total of 50 homework in each category were offered to students between October 2014 and April 2015, and their learning was assessed in two standardized exams offered in this period.We found that CGAHW students on average obtained lower homework scores than PBTHW students, but they obtained 4.28 percent higher scores in exams than PBTHW students. Lower homework scores could be attributed to students receiving more questions in their weak areas in CGAHW. However, by doing more questions in their weak areas and less in their strong areas, students achieved personalized learning in CGAHW, and hence obtained higher exam scores. To provide evidence that personalized learning in CGAHW resulted in improvement in their exam scores, we show that students that were offered higher levels of personalization in CGAHW, obtained higher exam scores. To further understand the differential effect of CGAHW on students of different abilities, we categorized students in low, medium, and high categories of ability based on their mathematics scores in standardized exams at the beginning of experiment. We found that personalized learning through CGAHW helped the students in low and medium ability categories but not in high ability category. Overall, we developed and deployed an adaptive homework generation application in a field set up to show how ICT-enabled personalized learning could improve educational production with existing school resources.
用个性化作业补救教育:来自印度随机实地实验的证据
信息和通信技术(ICT)能够在资源匮乏的学校系统中弥补教育生产吗?我们在印度海得拉巴的一组寄宿学校进行了随机实地实验来研究这个问题。在学校环境中,学生首先通过课堂指导学习概念,然后通过做作业来巩固他们的学习。在我们的实验中,学生首先通过课堂教学学习不同的数学主题,然后随机选择一半的学生分配计算机生成的自适应作业(CGAHW),另一半学生分配纸质传统作业(PBTHW)。在PBTHW中,预先确定了不同主题的简单和困难问题的数量。在CGAHW中,总问题的前一半是简单类问题,并根据学生在这些问题上的表现,自适应地生成后面的问题,以便:(1)学生回答错误的主题提供更多的问题;(2)当学生正确回答该主题的简单问题时,提供该主题的难题。因此,虽然所有PBTHW学生收到的不同主题的简单和困难问题数量相同,但CGAHW学生根据个人学习需求收到的不同主题的问题数量和难度等级不同。在2014年10月至2015年4月期间,每个类别的作业共50份,并在此期间的两次标准化考试中评估他们的学习情况。我们发现,CGAHW学生的平均家庭作业成绩低于PBTHW学生,但他们的考试成绩比PBTHW学生高4.28%。家庭作业分数较低的原因可以归结为学生在CGAHW的薄弱领域收到了更多的问题。但是,通过多做弱项题,少做强项题,学生在CGAHW中实现了个性化学习,从而获得了更高的考试成绩。为了证明在CGAHW中个性化学习可以提高学生的考试成绩,我们表明,在CGAHW中接受更高水平个性化学习的学生获得了更高的考试成绩。为了进一步了解CGAHW对不同能力学生的差异影响,我们在实验开始时根据学生在标准化考试中的数学成绩将学生分为低、中、高能力类别。我们发现,通过CGAHW进行个性化学习对中低能力类别的学生有帮助,而对高能力类别的学生没有帮助。总体而言,我们开发并部署了一个自适应作业生成应用程序,用于展示利用信息通信技术的个性化学习如何利用现有学校资源改善教育生产。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信