Políticas e reformas curriculares no Brasil

J. Malanchen, Sílvia Alves dos Santos
{"title":"Políticas e reformas curriculares no Brasil","authors":"J. Malanchen, Sílvia Alves dos Santos","doi":"10.20396/rho.v20i0.8656967","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In the last 20 years, the issue of scholar curriculum and other educational policies have been the subject of constant reforms in Brazil, our objective in this paper is to expose the curricular reforms that took place and how the process of elaborating the National Base (BNCC) currently in force in Brazil (BRAZIL, 2017, 2018), as well as analyzing and exposing some principles of pedagogy that directs the document: the pedagogy of competences. In the sequence we present the understanding and defense of curriculum and scholar knowledge from the assumptions of historical-critical pedagogy, which has its theoretical foundations anchored in historical and dialectical materialism. We show that the conception of training that guides the BNCC is based on an instrumental and utilitarian rationality, directed by business interests. We analyze that the intention is to deepen the emptying of the function of the school, the teacher and the scholar curriculum, denying objective and systematized knowledge and reinforcing a pragmatic, utilitarian and technicist pedagogy, whose objective is the technical training for employment and not to form for work with meaning in human emancipation. Concomitantly, we observe that the conception that directs the BNCC has as its final objective the absolute control of the process of formation of the individuals, through the control of the curriculum for basic education, teacher training and the evaluation in large scale.","PeriodicalId":230861,"journal":{"name":"Revista HISTEDBR on line","volume":"51 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-07-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"5","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Revista HISTEDBR on line","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.20396/rho.v20i0.8656967","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

Abstract

In the last 20 years, the issue of scholar curriculum and other educational policies have been the subject of constant reforms in Brazil, our objective in this paper is to expose the curricular reforms that took place and how the process of elaborating the National Base (BNCC) currently in force in Brazil (BRAZIL, 2017, 2018), as well as analyzing and exposing some principles of pedagogy that directs the document: the pedagogy of competences. In the sequence we present the understanding and defense of curriculum and scholar knowledge from the assumptions of historical-critical pedagogy, which has its theoretical foundations anchored in historical and dialectical materialism. We show that the conception of training that guides the BNCC is based on an instrumental and utilitarian rationality, directed by business interests. We analyze that the intention is to deepen the emptying of the function of the school, the teacher and the scholar curriculum, denying objective and systematized knowledge and reinforcing a pragmatic, utilitarian and technicist pedagogy, whose objective is the technical training for employment and not to form for work with meaning in human emancipation. Concomitantly, we observe that the conception that directs the BNCC has as its final objective the absolute control of the process of formation of the individuals, through the control of the curriculum for basic education, teacher training and the evaluation in large scale.
在过去的20年里,学者课程和其他教育政策的问题一直是巴西不断改革的主题,我们在本文中的目标是揭示已经发生的课程改革,以及如何制定目前在巴西生效的国家基础(BNCC)的过程(巴西,2017年,2018年),以及分析和揭示指导文件的一些教育学原则:能力教育学。在这个序列中,我们从历史批判教育学的假设中呈现对课程和学者知识的理解和辩护,它的理论基础植根于历史和辩证唯物主义。我们表明,指导BNCC的培训概念是基于一种工具和功利的理性,以商业利益为导向。我们分析其意图是深化学校、教师和学者课程功能的空化,否定客观和系统化的知识,强化一种实用主义、功利主义和技术主义的教学法,其目的是为就业提供技术培训,而不是为具有人类解放意义的工作提供形式。与此同时,我们观察到指导BNCC的概念将通过控制基础教育课程、教师培训和大规模评估来绝对控制个人的形成过程作为其最终目标。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信