Portuguese and Brazilian students perceptions regarding the flow of knowledge in their courses: Two different realities?

C. Leão, F. Soares, R. Hausmann, A. Guedes, M. T. Sena Esteves, G. Alves, Isabel Brás Pereira, C. Petry
{"title":"Portuguese and Brazilian students perceptions regarding the flow of knowledge in their courses: Two different realities?","authors":"C. Leão, F. Soares, R. Hausmann, A. Guedes, M. T. Sena Esteves, G. Alves, Isabel Brás Pereira, C. Petry","doi":"10.1109/CISPEE.2016.7777728","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The present study reports findings on students' perceptions in Electrical/Electronic Engineering courses from four higher education institutions: two Portuguese and two Brazilian. This study was based on a questionnaire previously validated that contains two main parts: student characterization and a list of forty-four items, divided in six groups (Teacher Involvement Perception, Student Interest, Student-Teacher Interaction, Course Organization and Functioning, Infrastructures and Overall Satisfaction). Students classified each item in accordance with their level of agreement (1, Strongly Disagree, to 5, Strongly Agree). The main goal of the research was to look for the evolution of a set of these items along the first three curricular years and assess similarities and differences among courses and higher education institutions considered. The set of items was chosen in a way to achieve a better understanding of how the flow of knowledge in these courses is perceived in apparently different realities. The results show that, in general, students do not understand the flow of knowledge along the first three years of study. Despite the differences observed among the four higher education institutions, those differences do not lead to different realities between the two countries.","PeriodicalId":309144,"journal":{"name":"2016 2nd International Conference of the Portuguese Society for Engineering Education (CISPEE)","volume":"68 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2016 2nd International Conference of the Portuguese Society for Engineering Education (CISPEE)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/CISPEE.2016.7777728","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

The present study reports findings on students' perceptions in Electrical/Electronic Engineering courses from four higher education institutions: two Portuguese and two Brazilian. This study was based on a questionnaire previously validated that contains two main parts: student characterization and a list of forty-four items, divided in six groups (Teacher Involvement Perception, Student Interest, Student-Teacher Interaction, Course Organization and Functioning, Infrastructures and Overall Satisfaction). Students classified each item in accordance with their level of agreement (1, Strongly Disagree, to 5, Strongly Agree). The main goal of the research was to look for the evolution of a set of these items along the first three curricular years and assess similarities and differences among courses and higher education institutions considered. The set of items was chosen in a way to achieve a better understanding of how the flow of knowledge in these courses is perceived in apparently different realities. The results show that, in general, students do not understand the flow of knowledge along the first three years of study. Despite the differences observed among the four higher education institutions, those differences do not lead to different realities between the two countries.
葡萄牙和巴西学生对课程中知识流动的看法:两种不同的现实?
本研究报告了来自四所高等教育机构(两所葡萄牙院校和两所巴西院校)的学生对电气/电子工程课程的看法。本研究基于先前验证的问卷调查,该问卷包含两个主要部分:学生特征和44个项目的列表,分为六组(教师参与感知,学生兴趣,师生互动,课程组织和功能,基础设施和总体满意度)。学生根据他们的同意程度对每个项目进行分类(1,非常不同意,到5,非常同意)。这项研究的主要目标是寻找一组这些项目在前三个课程年的演变,并评估课程和高等教育机构之间的异同。选择这组项目是为了更好地理解这些课程中的知识流是如何在明显不同的现实中被感知的。结果表明,总体而言,学生在前三年的学习中并不理解知识的流动。尽管这四所高等教育机构之间存在差异,但这些差异并没有导致两国之间的现实不同。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信