We Didn't Do That Did We? Representation of the Veteran Experience1

Anne L. Shewring
{"title":"We Didn't Do That Did We? Representation of the Veteran Experience1","authors":"Anne L. Shewring","doi":"10.1111/J.1537-4726.2000.2304_51.X","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\"I sometimes find myself wondering, in a sudden panic, whether I'm not in the way of developing great numb patches in my sensibility of which I shall never be cured even if I do come through this war...I sometimes see myself in the future transformed into a sort of invalid who has suffered an amputation of all his delicate sentiments, like a man who has lost all his fingers and can only feel things with a couple of stumps. And there will be millions of us like that.\" -Jules Romains, Men of Good Will \"I don't feel like me anymore.\" -Timmy, Born on the Fourth of July The theme of this paper is the returning war veteran. It began as a comparison of four films, The Best Years of Our Lives (William Wyler, 1946), The Men (Fred Zinnemann, 1950), Coming Home (Hal Ashby, 1978), and Born on the Fourth of July (Oliver Stone, 1989), each dealing with the experience of returning veterans from one of two conflicts, World War II or the Vietnam War. There was clearly what Dixon Wecter calls a \"repetition of pattern\" in those experiences, so that it became interesting to compare how far these patterns could be extended and what other mediums apart from film had been used to illustrate the veteran experience. It seemed that some kind of commonalty emerged from the accounts of veterans, their families and the wider society into which they returned, and that the difficulties and problems described in such accounts were universal. But popular culture, and perhaps popular myth also, leaves one with a sense that the experience for the Vietnam veteran was somehow different. Not only was this war more problematic for society but the position of its veterans was also more complicated. This paper seeks to question that sense of difference. Was the Vietnam veteran's experience much changed from that of other veterans and, if so, what reasons can be found for this difference? The paper will compare veteran experiences from a number of other conflicts and, while using the four films cited as a basis for discussion, it will also call upon evidence from literature and history. In his farsighted book, Veteran Comes Back, written in 1944 as America was considering the fate of the returning World War II veteran, Professor Willard Waller wrote extensively of the problems encountered by previous veteran groups. The issues he raises form a useful baseline for any consideration of the veteran experience. He writes most impressively about anger and isolation, the two traits which seem, at least initially, to define the veteran's state of mind. Waller describes his own encounters with veterans from World War I: The soldier is glad to be home, but he comes home angry... In the early months of 1919, the writer [Waller] talked with a great many other demobilized soldiers on Chicago streets. Although he had felt something of the service-man's rebellion, he was astonished as any civilian at the intensity of their fury. They were angry about something; it was not clear just what. The writer questioned many of them, but found not one who could put his grievances into understandable form. But there was never any mistaking their temper. They hated somebody for something. (95)2 This anger is most immediately expressed in the actions of soldiers still in the field. Dixon Wecter describes the feelings of the soldier at the end of the American Civil War: \"A freeborn American, he could not always comprehend why the red tape of demobilization held him back\" (135). Once the conflict ends, soldiers have time to brood over the conditions which, in wartime seemed necessary, but which are now vexing. Wecter records two comments from soldiers awaiting demobilization after World War I: \"I sure am homesick since they quit fighting,\" wrote an Illinois private to his mother...\"While they were fighting, it never entered my mind. But now that is about all I have to think about.\" The second [comment] comes from a young schoolteacher draftee from Virginia: \"Nobody minded the lice very much until after the Armistice\" (272). …","PeriodicalId":134380,"journal":{"name":"Journal of American & Comparative Cultures","volume":"234 1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2000-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of American & Comparative Cultures","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/J.1537-4726.2000.2304_51.X","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

"I sometimes find myself wondering, in a sudden panic, whether I'm not in the way of developing great numb patches in my sensibility of which I shall never be cured even if I do come through this war...I sometimes see myself in the future transformed into a sort of invalid who has suffered an amputation of all his delicate sentiments, like a man who has lost all his fingers and can only feel things with a couple of stumps. And there will be millions of us like that." -Jules Romains, Men of Good Will "I don't feel like me anymore." -Timmy, Born on the Fourth of July The theme of this paper is the returning war veteran. It began as a comparison of four films, The Best Years of Our Lives (William Wyler, 1946), The Men (Fred Zinnemann, 1950), Coming Home (Hal Ashby, 1978), and Born on the Fourth of July (Oliver Stone, 1989), each dealing with the experience of returning veterans from one of two conflicts, World War II or the Vietnam War. There was clearly what Dixon Wecter calls a "repetition of pattern" in those experiences, so that it became interesting to compare how far these patterns could be extended and what other mediums apart from film had been used to illustrate the veteran experience. It seemed that some kind of commonalty emerged from the accounts of veterans, their families and the wider society into which they returned, and that the difficulties and problems described in such accounts were universal. But popular culture, and perhaps popular myth also, leaves one with a sense that the experience for the Vietnam veteran was somehow different. Not only was this war more problematic for society but the position of its veterans was also more complicated. This paper seeks to question that sense of difference. Was the Vietnam veteran's experience much changed from that of other veterans and, if so, what reasons can be found for this difference? The paper will compare veteran experiences from a number of other conflicts and, while using the four films cited as a basis for discussion, it will also call upon evidence from literature and history. In his farsighted book, Veteran Comes Back, written in 1944 as America was considering the fate of the returning World War II veteran, Professor Willard Waller wrote extensively of the problems encountered by previous veteran groups. The issues he raises form a useful baseline for any consideration of the veteran experience. He writes most impressively about anger and isolation, the two traits which seem, at least initially, to define the veteran's state of mind. Waller describes his own encounters with veterans from World War I: The soldier is glad to be home, but he comes home angry... In the early months of 1919, the writer [Waller] talked with a great many other demobilized soldiers on Chicago streets. Although he had felt something of the service-man's rebellion, he was astonished as any civilian at the intensity of their fury. They were angry about something; it was not clear just what. The writer questioned many of them, but found not one who could put his grievances into understandable form. But there was never any mistaking their temper. They hated somebody for something. (95)2 This anger is most immediately expressed in the actions of soldiers still in the field. Dixon Wecter describes the feelings of the soldier at the end of the American Civil War: "A freeborn American, he could not always comprehend why the red tape of demobilization held him back" (135). Once the conflict ends, soldiers have time to brood over the conditions which, in wartime seemed necessary, but which are now vexing. Wecter records two comments from soldiers awaiting demobilization after World War I: "I sure am homesick since they quit fighting," wrote an Illinois private to his mother..."While they were fighting, it never entered my mind. But now that is about all I have to think about." The second [comment] comes from a young schoolteacher draftee from Virginia: "Nobody minded the lice very much until after the Armistice" (272). …
我们没有那样做,对吧?老兵经历的表现
“有时我突然感到恐慌,我在想,我的感情是不是已经长出了很大的麻木,即使我经历了这场战争,我也永远无法治愈……有时我看到自己在未来会变成一种残疾人,失去了所有细腻的情感,就像一个失去了所有手指的人,只有几个残肢才能感知事物。将来会有数百万人像我们一样。”——朱尔斯·罗曼斯《善意男人》“我再也找不到自己了。”这篇文章的主题是归来的退伍军人。它开始于对四部电影的比较,《我们生命中最美好的岁月》(威廉·威勒,1946年)、《男人们》(弗雷德·津内曼,1950年)、《回家》(哈尔·阿什比,1978年)和《生于七月四日》(奥利弗·斯通,1989年),每部电影都讲述了从二战或越南战争中的一场冲突中归来的退伍军人的经历。很明显,在这些经历中存在着Dixon Wecter所说的“模式的重复”,所以比较这些模式可以延伸到什么程度,以及除了电影之外还有哪些其他媒介被用来说明老兵的经历,变得很有趣。从退伍军人、他们的家庭和他们返回的更广泛的社会的叙述中,似乎出现了某种共同点,这些叙述中描述的困难和问题是普遍存在的。但流行文化,或许还有流行神话,让人觉得越战老兵的经历在某种程度上是不同的。这场战争不仅给社会带来了更多的问题,而且退伍军人的处境也更加复杂。本文试图质疑这种差异感。越战老兵的经历与其他老兵有很大的不同吗?如果有,这种不同的原因是什么?这篇论文将比较其他一些冲突中的老兵经历,并将引用这四部电影作为讨论的基础,同时也将从文学和历史中寻求证据。威拉德·沃勒教授在他富有远见的著作《退伍军人归来》(Veteran Comes Back)中广泛地描述了以前退伍军人群体遇到的问题。这本书写于1944年,当时美国正在考虑这些二战老兵的命运。他提出的问题为任何考虑老兵经验的人提供了一个有用的基准。他对愤怒和孤独的描写给人留下了深刻的印象,至少在最初,这两种特征似乎定义了老兵的精神状态。沃勒描述了他自己与第一次世界大战退伍军人的遭遇:士兵们很高兴回家,但他回家时却很生气……1919年的头几个月,作家沃勒在芝加哥街头与许多其他复员士兵交谈。虽然他对这些军人的反抗多少有些感觉,但他和任何一个平民一样,对他们的愤怒之强烈感到惊讶。他们在为什么事生气;具体是什么还不清楚。笔者问了很多人,但没有一个人能把自己的委屈说得明白。但是他们的脾气是绝对不会弄错的。他们因为某些事情而憎恨某人。(95)这种愤怒最直接地表现在仍在战场上的士兵的行为上。Dixon Wecter描述了美国内战结束时士兵的感受:“一个生来自由的美国人,他总是不能理解为什么复员的繁文缛节阻碍了他”(135页)。一旦冲突结束,士兵们就有时间去思考那些在战时似乎是必要的条件,但现在却令人烦恼。韦克特记录了第一次世界大战后等待复员的士兵的两句话:“自从他们退出战斗以来,我肯定很想家,”一位伊利诺伊州的二等兵给他母亲写道……“当他们在打架的时候,我从来没有想过这件事。但现在我要考虑的就是这个了。”第二个[评论]来自弗吉尼亚州一位年轻的应征教师:“在停战之前,没有人太在意虱子”(272)。…
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信