Performance Evaluation of Selected Surface Irrigation Schemes in Kachabira Woreda, SNNPRS, Ethiopia

Muhammedziyad Geleto, M. Dananto, Demisachew Tadele
{"title":"Performance Evaluation of Selected Surface Irrigation Schemes in Kachabira Woreda, SNNPRS, Ethiopia","authors":"Muhammedziyad Geleto, M. Dananto, Demisachew Tadele","doi":"10.47721/arjee20180101013","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This study was conducted to evaluate the comparative performances of two community-managed small scale irrigation schemes at Gemesha and Ufute with a command area of 48 ha and 40 ha using internal performance indicators. In order to evaluate the irrigation water use efficiency at the field level, nine farmer fields were selected from each irrigation schemes in relation to their location (from the head, middle and tail end water users). The internal performance indicators namely, in conveyance efficiencies, application efficiencies, deep percolation, storage efficiencies and irrigation uniformity shows (61.15 and 65.63%), (58.75 and 71.7%), (41.25 and 28.3%), (36.91% and 23.9%) and (98.32 and 97.79%) for Gemesha and Ufute respectively. The irrigation ratio results for physical sustainability indicator shows 0.32 and 0.4 for Gemesha and Ufute irrigation respectively. The result of relative Irrigation Supply for both irrigation schemes was higher than one, this shows that there were over supply of water in both irrigation schemes for Gemesha and Ufute respectively. Based on the assessment carried out, Ufute irrigation scheme performed better than Gemesha irrigation scheme. But there is still a room for improvement of the performance of both irrigation schemes. Keywords: Internal indicators, efficiency, deep percolation, irrigation,","PeriodicalId":171414,"journal":{"name":"Applied Research Journal of Environmental Engineering","volume":"28 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-12-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Applied Research Journal of Environmental Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.47721/arjee20180101013","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

This study was conducted to evaluate the comparative performances of two community-managed small scale irrigation schemes at Gemesha and Ufute with a command area of 48 ha and 40 ha using internal performance indicators. In order to evaluate the irrigation water use efficiency at the field level, nine farmer fields were selected from each irrigation schemes in relation to their location (from the head, middle and tail end water users). The internal performance indicators namely, in conveyance efficiencies, application efficiencies, deep percolation, storage efficiencies and irrigation uniformity shows (61.15 and 65.63%), (58.75 and 71.7%), (41.25 and 28.3%), (36.91% and 23.9%) and (98.32 and 97.79%) for Gemesha and Ufute respectively. The irrigation ratio results for physical sustainability indicator shows 0.32 and 0.4 for Gemesha and Ufute irrigation respectively. The result of relative Irrigation Supply for both irrigation schemes was higher than one, this shows that there were over supply of water in both irrigation schemes for Gemesha and Ufute respectively. Based on the assessment carried out, Ufute irrigation scheme performed better than Gemesha irrigation scheme. But there is still a room for improvement of the performance of both irrigation schemes. Keywords: Internal indicators, efficiency, deep percolation, irrigation,
埃塞俄比亚Kachabira Woreda地区选定地表灌溉方案的效果评价
本研究采用内部绩效指标评价了格梅沙和乌富特两个社区管理的小规模灌溉方案的比较绩效,两个灌溉方案的指挥面积分别为48公顷和40公顷。为了评价农田水平上的灌溉用水效率,从每个灌溉方案中选择9个农户农田,根据其位置(从头、中、尾端用水户开始)。在输水效率、施药效率、深层渗透效率、蓄水效率和灌溉均匀性方面,葛梅沙和乌富特的内部绩效指标分别为(61.15和65.63%)、(58.75和71.7%)、(41.25和28.3%)、(36.91%和23.9%)和(98.32和97.79%)。物理可持续性指标的灌溉比结果分别为葛梅沙和乌富特灌溉的0.32和0.4。两种灌溉方案的相对灌溉供水量均大于1,说明格梅沙和乌富特两种灌溉方案均存在供水量过剩。评价结果表明,乌富特灌溉方案优于葛梅沙灌溉方案。但是,这两种灌溉方案的性能仍有改进的余地。关键词:内部指标;效率;深渗;
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信