Prediction of Changes in Negative Affect During the COVID-19 Pandemic by Experimental Fear Conditioning and Generalization Measures

Celina Imholze, Katharina Hutterer, Dominik Gall, U. Dannlowski, K. Domschke, E. Leehr, T. Lonsdorf, U. Lueken, A. Reif, Karoline Rosenkranz, M. Schiele, P. Zwanzger, P. Pauli, M. Gamer
{"title":"Prediction of Changes in Negative Affect During the COVID-19 Pandemic by Experimental Fear Conditioning and Generalization Measures","authors":"Celina Imholze, Katharina Hutterer, Dominik Gall, U. Dannlowski, K. Domschke, E. Leehr, T. Lonsdorf, U. Lueken, A. Reif, Karoline Rosenkranz, M. Schiele, P. Zwanzger, P. Pauli, M. Gamer","doi":"10.1027/2151-2604/a000523","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract: Adverse experiences interact with individual vulnerability in the etiology of mental disorders, but due to the paucity of longitudinal studies, their precise interplay remains unclear. Here, we investigated how individual differences in threat responsiveness modulated adjustments in negative affect during the COVID-19 pandemic. Participants ( N = 441) underwent a fear conditioning and generalization experiment between 2013 and 2020 and were reassessed regarding anxiety and depression symptoms after the pandemic outbreak. Participants showed increased levels of negative affect following pandemic onset, which were partly modulated by laboratory measures of threat responsiveness. Decreased differentiation of threat and safety signals in participants with higher prepandemic depression and anxiety scores in the laboratory assessment were most predictive of increased symptom levels after the onset of the pandemic. However, effects were small and should be replicated in independent samples to further characterize how individual differences in threat processing interact with adverse experiences in the development of psychopathology.","PeriodicalId":263823,"journal":{"name":"Zeitschrift für Psychologie","volume":"20 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Zeitschrift für Psychologie","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1027/2151-2604/a000523","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Abstract: Adverse experiences interact with individual vulnerability in the etiology of mental disorders, but due to the paucity of longitudinal studies, their precise interplay remains unclear. Here, we investigated how individual differences in threat responsiveness modulated adjustments in negative affect during the COVID-19 pandemic. Participants ( N = 441) underwent a fear conditioning and generalization experiment between 2013 and 2020 and were reassessed regarding anxiety and depression symptoms after the pandemic outbreak. Participants showed increased levels of negative affect following pandemic onset, which were partly modulated by laboratory measures of threat responsiveness. Decreased differentiation of threat and safety signals in participants with higher prepandemic depression and anxiety scores in the laboratory assessment were most predictive of increased symptom levels after the onset of the pandemic. However, effects were small and should be replicated in independent samples to further characterize how individual differences in threat processing interact with adverse experiences in the development of psychopathology.
基于实验恐惧条件反射和概化措施的新冠肺炎大流行期间负面情绪变化预测
在精神障碍的病因学中,不良经历与个体脆弱性相互作用,但由于缺乏纵向研究,它们之间的确切相互作用尚不清楚。在这里,我们研究了COVID-19大流行期间威胁反应的个体差异如何调节负面影响的调整。参与者(N = 441)在2013年至2020年期间进行了恐惧条件反射和泛化实验,并在大流行爆发后重新评估了焦虑和抑郁症状。参与者在大流行爆发后表现出更大程度的负面影响,这在一定程度上受到实验室威胁反应措施的调节。在实验室评估中,大流行前抑郁和焦虑得分较高的参与者的威胁和安全信号分化降低,最能预测大流行开始后症状水平的增加。然而,影响很小,应该在独立样本中重复,以进一步表征威胁处理的个体差异如何与精神病理学发展中的不良经历相互作用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信