Algorithmic racism: Racial perception and socioeconomic dimensions in digital image banks

Emilly F. F. Lima, Rui de Moraes Júnior
{"title":"Algorithmic racism: Racial perception and socioeconomic dimensions in digital image banks","authors":"Emilly F. F. Lima, Rui de Moraes Júnior","doi":"10.1109/istas52410.2021.9629193","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Algorithmic racism can be understood as the reproduction of racist stereotypes and practices in computational mechanisms, such as search results and advertisements, due to the biased training of algorithms and databases that replicate and intensify structural racism. Recent studies show how digital image banks reproduce several of these stereotypes, contributing to the perpetuation of oppression and microaggression against subalternate groups. Intending to understand this process, the aim of this study was to investigate the representation of racial and socioeconomic perceptions in digital image banks. Searches were carried out in Freepik, Pexels, and Pixabay banks, using the keywords Poverty, Misery, Wealth, and Money, which are indicators of low and high socioeconomic status, respectively. These words were validated in a survey carried out by the researchers to find which words are most associated with socioeconomic indicators. Free image banks and keywords in Portuguese were chosen to bring the research method closer to the reality of the behavior of most Brazilians. The searches on the three platforms totaled 6200 images, independently evaluated by three judges who also assigned a valence (positive, negative, or neutral) to each one of them. In the preliminary analyses, although the words Poverty and Misery are considered indicators of low socioeconomic status, a significant amount of images (about 40%) were evaluated by the judges as medium and high status. In the results of the Wealth and Money indicators, 60% of the images are illustrations or photos of material goods, and among the few people that appear, most are white (78%). There is still a long way to go against the structural problems of society and their reflexes on algorithms, but studies like this are important to raise questions about the content we produce and consume, as well as the way we browse the internet.","PeriodicalId":314239,"journal":{"name":"2021 IEEE International Symposium on Technology and Society (ISTAS)","volume":"24 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-10-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2021 IEEE International Symposium on Technology and Society (ISTAS)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/istas52410.2021.9629193","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Algorithmic racism can be understood as the reproduction of racist stereotypes and practices in computational mechanisms, such as search results and advertisements, due to the biased training of algorithms and databases that replicate and intensify structural racism. Recent studies show how digital image banks reproduce several of these stereotypes, contributing to the perpetuation of oppression and microaggression against subalternate groups. Intending to understand this process, the aim of this study was to investigate the representation of racial and socioeconomic perceptions in digital image banks. Searches were carried out in Freepik, Pexels, and Pixabay banks, using the keywords Poverty, Misery, Wealth, and Money, which are indicators of low and high socioeconomic status, respectively. These words were validated in a survey carried out by the researchers to find which words are most associated with socioeconomic indicators. Free image banks and keywords in Portuguese were chosen to bring the research method closer to the reality of the behavior of most Brazilians. The searches on the three platforms totaled 6200 images, independently evaluated by three judges who also assigned a valence (positive, negative, or neutral) to each one of them. In the preliminary analyses, although the words Poverty and Misery are considered indicators of low socioeconomic status, a significant amount of images (about 40%) were evaluated by the judges as medium and high status. In the results of the Wealth and Money indicators, 60% of the images are illustrations or photos of material goods, and among the few people that appear, most are white (78%). There is still a long way to go against the structural problems of society and their reflexes on algorithms, but studies like this are important to raise questions about the content we produce and consume, as well as the way we browse the internet.
算法种族主义:数字图片库中的种族认知和社会经济维度
算法种族主义可以理解为在计算机制(如搜索结果和广告)中复制种族主义刻板印象和做法,这是由于对复制和加剧结构性种族主义的算法和数据库进行有偏见的训练。最近的研究表明,数字图像库如何再现了这些刻板印象,助长了对次替代群体的压迫和微侵略的延续。为了理解这一过程,本研究的目的是调查数字图像库中种族和社会经济观念的表现。在Freepik, Pexels和Pixabay银行进行搜索,使用关键词贫穷,痛苦,财富和金钱,分别是低和高社会经济地位的指标。研究人员在一项调查中证实了这些词的有效性,该调查旨在找出哪些词与社会经济指标联系最密切。选择葡萄牙语的免费图片库和关键词,使研究方法更接近大多数巴西人行为的现实。三个平台上的搜索总数为6200张图片,由三位评委独立评估,并为每张图片分配一个效价(正面、负面或中性)。在初步分析中,虽然贫穷和悲惨被认为是低社会经济地位的指标,但相当数量的图像(约40%)被评委评估为中等和高地位。在财富和金钱指标的结果中,60%的图像是实物的插图或照片,在少数出现的人中,大多数是白人(78%)。要解决社会的结构性问题及其对算法的反应,还有很长的路要走,但像这样的研究对于提出有关我们生产和消费的内容以及我们浏览互联网的方式的问题很重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信