Measuring Public Entrepreneurship of Quangos

P. Friedrich, K. Ukrainski
{"title":"Measuring Public Entrepreneurship of Quangos","authors":"P. Friedrich, K. Ukrainski","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.2172801","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Quangos and public entrepreneurship are closely related. The economic theory of quangos allows us to develop a quango theory and highlight the effects of public entrepreneurship. By considering principal agent relations we show how public entrepreneurship of government and quango influence each other in the framework of vertical competition. Also horizontal competition between a quango and other quangos as well as to private enterprises influences the political entrepreneurship. Reference is made to a duopoly model for a competing quango of version 2. Considering the measurement of success of political entrepreneurship, we find that when it is related to increasing output the output development of the quangos may be used as measure of public entrepreneurship success which is relatively high in case of output maximising management. With other types of management the success turns out lower. If the political success is measured by effects of quango on third parties additional difficulties arise. A model of voters reactions on quango production within a model of public sector shows measurement of public political and public quango entrepreneurship and the budgets which result from these entrepreneurships. As there is no satisfying effect measurement models for quangos, which are empirically verified. Moreover, no social welfare function or a general social indicator function is available. Also social success in the sense of welfare maximisation by benefit-cost measurement through willingness to pay measurement is not applicable. Therefore, the success should be measured at the quango level by application of output oriented criteria. Examples from Germany and Estonia show chances and limits of public entrepreneurship within and through quangos.","PeriodicalId":169917,"journal":{"name":"ERPN: Public Policies (Social) (Sub-Topic)","volume":"9 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2012-11-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ERPN: Public Policies (Social) (Sub-Topic)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2172801","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Quangos and public entrepreneurship are closely related. The economic theory of quangos allows us to develop a quango theory and highlight the effects of public entrepreneurship. By considering principal agent relations we show how public entrepreneurship of government and quango influence each other in the framework of vertical competition. Also horizontal competition between a quango and other quangos as well as to private enterprises influences the political entrepreneurship. Reference is made to a duopoly model for a competing quango of version 2. Considering the measurement of success of political entrepreneurship, we find that when it is related to increasing output the output development of the quangos may be used as measure of public entrepreneurship success which is relatively high in case of output maximising management. With other types of management the success turns out lower. If the political success is measured by effects of quango on third parties additional difficulties arise. A model of voters reactions on quango production within a model of public sector shows measurement of public political and public quango entrepreneurship and the budgets which result from these entrepreneurships. As there is no satisfying effect measurement models for quangos, which are empirically verified. Moreover, no social welfare function or a general social indicator function is available. Also social success in the sense of welfare maximisation by benefit-cost measurement through willingness to pay measurement is not applicable. Therefore, the success should be measured at the quango level by application of output oriented criteria. Examples from Germany and Estonia show chances and limits of public entrepreneurship within and through quangos.
衡量半官方组织的公众企业家精神
半官方组织和大众创业是密切相关的。半官方组织的经济理论使我们能够发展半官方组织理论,突出公众企业家精神的作用。通过考虑委托代理关系,揭示了在垂直竞争的框架下,政府和半官方机构的公众企业家精神是如何相互影响的。半官方机构与其他半官方机构之间以及私营企业之间的横向竞争也影响着政治企业家精神。参考了版本2中竞争性半官方机构的双寡头垄断模型。考虑到政治创业成功的衡量标准,我们发现当与增加产出相关时,半官方组织的产出发展可以作为衡量公共创业成功的标准,在产出最大化管理下,公共创业成功的衡量标准相对较高。对于其他类型的管理,成功的几率更低。如果以半官方机构对第三方的影响来衡量政治上的成功,就会出现额外的困难。在公共部门模型中,选民对半官方组织生产的反应模型显示了对公共政治和公共半官方组织企业家精神以及这些企业家精神所产生的预算的衡量。由于目前还没有令人满意的半非政府组织效应测量模型,这些模型都是经过实证验证的。此外,没有社会福利函数或一般的社会指标函数可用。此外,通过支付意愿衡量的利益成本衡量的福利最大化意义上的社会成功也不适用。因此,应该在半官方水平上通过应用面向产出的标准来衡量成功。德国和爱沙尼亚的例子显示了半非政府组织内部和通过半非政府组织开展公共创业的机会和限制。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信