Towards an automatic approach for hardware verification according to ISO 26262 functional safety standard

J. Sini, M. Reorda, M. Violante, Peter Sarson
{"title":"Towards an automatic approach for hardware verification according to ISO 26262 functional safety standard","authors":"J. Sini, M. Reorda, M. Violante, Peter Sarson","doi":"10.1109/IOLTS.2018.8474083","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The Failure Mode, Effect and Diagnostic Analysis (FMEDA) is a technique widely adopted by automotive industry to assess the level of reliability of hardware designs. Although very useful, it has the problem of taking a long time to complete and requires experts with extensive knowledge of the circuit under consideration. In this paper, it is presented a comparison between the analysis results obtained from an automatic tool developed by the authors with respect to the ones obtained by hand from a team of experts, followed by a critical review of the strengths and weaknesses, about the rules for automatic classification of the faults effects.","PeriodicalId":241735,"journal":{"name":"2018 IEEE 24th International Symposium on On-Line Testing And Robust System Design (IOLTS)","volume":"60 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2018 IEEE 24th International Symposium on On-Line Testing And Robust System Design (IOLTS)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/IOLTS.2018.8474083","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The Failure Mode, Effect and Diagnostic Analysis (FMEDA) is a technique widely adopted by automotive industry to assess the level of reliability of hardware designs. Although very useful, it has the problem of taking a long time to complete and requires experts with extensive knowledge of the circuit under consideration. In this paper, it is presented a comparison between the analysis results obtained from an automatic tool developed by the authors with respect to the ones obtained by hand from a team of experts, followed by a critical review of the strengths and weaknesses, about the rules for automatic classification of the faults effects.
朝着根据ISO 26262功能安全标准自动进行硬件验证的方向发展
失效模式、影响和诊断分析(FMEDA)是汽车工业广泛采用的一种评估硬件设计可靠性水平的技术。虽然非常有用,但它的问题是需要很长时间才能完成,并且需要对所考虑的电路具有广泛知识的专家。本文将作者开发的自动分析工具与专家小组手工分析的结果进行了比较,并对故障影响自动分类规则的优缺点进行了评述。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信