{"title":"Sensitivity, Specificity, Predictive Values and Accuracy of clinical diagnosis of Acute Stroke","authors":"M. Anwar, Sajeda Afrin, Md. Shakhawat Hossain, Shahed Jahan, Md Mahfuzer Rahman","doi":"10.3329/jrpmc.v8i1.65038","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Stroke is a leading cause of death and disability globally and particularly in low and middle-income countries, and the burden is increasing. To prevent complications and permanent defects in stroke, early diagnosis is the key that can easily obtained by a CT scan of brain. However, quick access to CT scanning is not available in every country and hospital specially in Bangladesh, various clinical findings especially neurological signs and symptoms and risk factors differentiation are helpful in differentiating the types of stroke.\nObjective: This study aimed to see the sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value and accuracy of clinical diagnosis in the detection of stroke subtype.\nMethods: This hospital based cross-sectional comparative study was conducted in Department of Medicine, Rangpur medical college hospital, Rangpur, Bangladesh from January 2010 to December 2011 on three hundred (300) suspected acute stroke patients selected by purposive sampling technique. The clinical diagnosis of type of stroke was made on the basis of mode of presentation, risk factors and signs and confirmed by CT scan of brain within 1 week of attack. Then the clinical diagnosis was compared with the results of CT scan. Statistical analyses related with this study were performed by using of SPSS-19 package program.\nResults: Among the 300 patients, 73(24.3%) patients were clinically diagnosed as hemorrhagic stroke and 227(75.6%) patients were as infarctive stroke. Out of 73 clinically diagnosed haemorrhagic stroke patients, CT scan revealed that 61 (83.6%) patients had intracerebral hemorrhage, 5 (6.8%) had infarct. And out of 133 diagnosed ischemic stroke patients, CT scan revealed that 203 (89.4%) patients had infarction, 6 (2.6%) had intracerebral hemorrhage. The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value and accuracy of clinical diagnosis of hemorrhagic stroke were 91.0%, 94.8%, 83.6%, 97.4% and 94.0% respectively. The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value and accuracy of clinical diagnosis of infarctive stroke were 97.6%, 73.9%, 89.4%, 92.2% and 90.3% respectively.\nConclusion: CT scan of brain remains the gold standard for differential diagnosis, but the availability of CT scan is not always feasible, and it is virtually impossible to submit all stroke patients to CT scan. Adequate knowledge on risk factors, clinical features and initial investigations may contribute to such a differentiation of cerebral infarction from intracerebral hemorrhage with high accuracy where rapid access to Computed Tomography (CT) is lacking.\nJ Rang Med Col. March 2023; Vol. 8, No. 2:33-39","PeriodicalId":370900,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Rangpur Medical College","volume":"13 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-04-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Rangpur Medical College","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3329/jrpmc.v8i1.65038","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: Stroke is a leading cause of death and disability globally and particularly in low and middle-income countries, and the burden is increasing. To prevent complications and permanent defects in stroke, early diagnosis is the key that can easily obtained by a CT scan of brain. However, quick access to CT scanning is not available in every country and hospital specially in Bangladesh, various clinical findings especially neurological signs and symptoms and risk factors differentiation are helpful in differentiating the types of stroke.
Objective: This study aimed to see the sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value and accuracy of clinical diagnosis in the detection of stroke subtype.
Methods: This hospital based cross-sectional comparative study was conducted in Department of Medicine, Rangpur medical college hospital, Rangpur, Bangladesh from January 2010 to December 2011 on three hundred (300) suspected acute stroke patients selected by purposive sampling technique. The clinical diagnosis of type of stroke was made on the basis of mode of presentation, risk factors and signs and confirmed by CT scan of brain within 1 week of attack. Then the clinical diagnosis was compared with the results of CT scan. Statistical analyses related with this study were performed by using of SPSS-19 package program.
Results: Among the 300 patients, 73(24.3%) patients were clinically diagnosed as hemorrhagic stroke and 227(75.6%) patients were as infarctive stroke. Out of 73 clinically diagnosed haemorrhagic stroke patients, CT scan revealed that 61 (83.6%) patients had intracerebral hemorrhage, 5 (6.8%) had infarct. And out of 133 diagnosed ischemic stroke patients, CT scan revealed that 203 (89.4%) patients had infarction, 6 (2.6%) had intracerebral hemorrhage. The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value and accuracy of clinical diagnosis of hemorrhagic stroke were 91.0%, 94.8%, 83.6%, 97.4% and 94.0% respectively. The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value and accuracy of clinical diagnosis of infarctive stroke were 97.6%, 73.9%, 89.4%, 92.2% and 90.3% respectively.
Conclusion: CT scan of brain remains the gold standard for differential diagnosis, but the availability of CT scan is not always feasible, and it is virtually impossible to submit all stroke patients to CT scan. Adequate knowledge on risk factors, clinical features and initial investigations may contribute to such a differentiation of cerebral infarction from intracerebral hemorrhage with high accuracy where rapid access to Computed Tomography (CT) is lacking.
J Rang Med Col. March 2023; Vol. 8, No. 2:33-39
背景:中风是全球,特别是低收入和中等收入国家死亡和残疾的主要原因,而且负担正在增加。早期诊断是预防中风并发症和永久性缺陷的关键,CT扫描可以很容易地获得。然而,并不是每个国家和医院都能快速获得CT扫描,特别是在孟加拉国,各种临床发现,特别是神经体征和症状以及危险因素的区分有助于区分中风的类型。目的:观察临床诊断在脑卒中亚型检测中的敏感性、特异性、阳性预测值、阴性预测值及准确性。方法:选取2010年1月至2011年12月在孟加拉国Rangpur医学院附属医院内科采用有目的抽样方法对300例疑似急性脑卒中患者进行横断面比较研究。根据表现方式、危险因素及体征,临床诊断脑卒中类型,发病1周内行脑CT扫描确认。然后将临床诊断结果与CT扫描结果进行比较。本研究的相关统计分析采用SPSS-19软件包程序进行。结果:300例患者中,临床诊断出血性卒中73例(24.3%),梗死性卒中227例(75.6%)。73例临床诊断出血性脑卒中患者中,CT扫描显示61例(83.6%)有脑出血,5例(6.8%)有梗死。133例诊断为缺血性脑卒中的患者中,CT扫描显示梗死203例(89.4%),脑出血6例(2.6%)。出血性脑卒中临床诊断的敏感性、特异性、阳性预测值、阴性预测值和准确性分别为91.0%、94.8%、83.6%、97.4%和94.0%。临床诊断梗死性脑卒中的敏感性、特异性、阳性预测值、阴性预测值和准确性分别为97.6%、73.9%、89.4%、92.2%和90.3%。结论:脑CT扫描仍然是鉴别诊断的金标准,但CT扫描的可用性并不总是可行的,几乎不可能使所有脑卒中患者都接受CT扫描。在缺乏快速计算机断层扫描(CT)的情况下,对危险因素、临床特征和初步调查的充分了解可能有助于准确区分脑梗死和脑出血。J Rang Med Col. 2023年3月;第八卷2:33-39