{"title":"F. I. Chaliapin and V. E. Meyerhold in the work on the production of “Boris Godunov” (Mariinsky Theatre, 1911)","authors":"A. Ryaposov","doi":"10.30853/pa20230029","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The aim of the historical and theoretical study is to find an answer to the question of the place that the 1911 production of M. P. Mussorgsky’s opera “Boris Godunov” in the Mariinsky Theatre occupies in the creative work of the director V. E. Meyerhold and the role that it plays. The paper clarifies the meaning and content of the productions present in the opera’s 1911 staging, i.e. Chaliapin’s production and Meyerhold’s production; reveals the structure of the stage image of Tsar Boris played by F. I. Chaliapin and the method for creating the actor’s presence on stage that underlies the work on the main role; the primary characteristics of Meyerhold’s production are formulated. The scientific novelty of this study is not connected with the discovery of new sources, but lies in the promotion of scientific hypotheses that can pose new questions to long-existing sources and extract from them new knowledge about Meyerhold’s 1911 production of “Boris Godunov” on the stage of the Mariinsky Theatre, which is considered in the existing literature to be the director’s failure. As a result, it has been determined that Chaliapin’s production and Meyerhold’s production did not contradict each other, but were arranged by Meyerhold into an integral stage composition. In addition, this production cannot be considered the director’s failure, it represents one of the stages of mastering a new area of activities – opera directing.","PeriodicalId":365294,"journal":{"name":"Pan-Art","volume":"21 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pan-Art","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.30853/pa20230029","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
The aim of the historical and theoretical study is to find an answer to the question of the place that the 1911 production of M. P. Mussorgsky’s opera “Boris Godunov” in the Mariinsky Theatre occupies in the creative work of the director V. E. Meyerhold and the role that it plays. The paper clarifies the meaning and content of the productions present in the opera’s 1911 staging, i.e. Chaliapin’s production and Meyerhold’s production; reveals the structure of the stage image of Tsar Boris played by F. I. Chaliapin and the method for creating the actor’s presence on stage that underlies the work on the main role; the primary characteristics of Meyerhold’s production are formulated. The scientific novelty of this study is not connected with the discovery of new sources, but lies in the promotion of scientific hypotheses that can pose new questions to long-existing sources and extract from them new knowledge about Meyerhold’s 1911 production of “Boris Godunov” on the stage of the Mariinsky Theatre, which is considered in the existing literature to be the director’s failure. As a result, it has been determined that Chaliapin’s production and Meyerhold’s production did not contradict each other, but were arranged by Meyerhold into an integral stage composition. In addition, this production cannot be considered the director’s failure, it represents one of the stages of mastering a new area of activities – opera directing.
F. I.查利亚平和V. E.梅耶霍尔德在制作《鲍里斯·戈杜诺夫》(马林斯基剧院,1911年)中的工作
历史和理论研究的目的是找到一个问题的答案,即1911年M. P.穆索尔斯基的歌剧“鲍里斯·戈杜诺夫”在马林斯基剧院的制作在导演V. E.梅耶霍尔德的创作工作中所占的位置和它所扮演的角色。本文阐明了1911年舞台剧中所呈现的作品的意义和内容,即夏里亚平的作品和梅耶霍尔德的作品;揭示了F. I. Chaliapin扮演的沙皇鲍里斯的舞台形象的结构,以及创造演员在舞台上的存在感的方法,这种存在感是主要角色的基础;阐述了梅耶霍尔德生产的主要特点。本研究的科学新颖性与新资源的发现无关,而在于促进科学假设,这些假设可以对长期存在的资源提出新的问题,并从中提取有关迈耶霍尔德1911年在马林斯基剧院舞台上制作的“鲍里斯·戈杜诺夫”的新知识,现有文献认为这是导演的失败。由此可以确定,Chaliapin的作品和Meyerhold的作品并不矛盾,而是被Meyerhold安排成一个完整的舞台作品。此外,这部作品不能被认为是导演的失败,它代表了掌握一个新的活动领域——歌剧导演的阶段之一。