An Investigation of the Effects of Processing Instruction in the Online Learning of the Past Perfect Tense: A Case at University

Tran Minh Uyen Ky
{"title":"An Investigation of the Effects of Processing Instruction in the Online Learning of the Past Perfect Tense: A Case at University","authors":"Tran Minh Uyen Ky","doi":"10.54855/ijte.23331","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Vietnamese learners and teachers experienced enormous difficulty in online learning during COVID-19 due to their previous limited exposure to virtual learning. The primary purpose of the study is to develop an appropriate and effective grammar instruction approach for virtual learning. To achieve that purpose, this study compared the relative effects of two types of grammar instruction (Traditional Instruction and Processing Instruction) on online learning of the Past Perfect Tense. More than 160 learners from two elementary classes at a university in Ho Chi Minh City participated in the study with two treatment groups: Traditional Instruction (TI) and Processing Instruction (PI). All the lessons were conducted in a virtual classroom. Pre-test and post-test involving comprehension and production tasks were measured. Overall, the learners who experienced PI gained significantly better results than the TI group in comprehension tasks, while both groups performed similarly in production tasks. Moreover, many features of Processing Instruction are well-suited for the nature of online learning, which benefits learners while they are struggling with virtual classrooms.","PeriodicalId":196814,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of TESOL & Education","volume":"126 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of TESOL & Education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.54855/ijte.23331","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Vietnamese learners and teachers experienced enormous difficulty in online learning during COVID-19 due to their previous limited exposure to virtual learning. The primary purpose of the study is to develop an appropriate and effective grammar instruction approach for virtual learning. To achieve that purpose, this study compared the relative effects of two types of grammar instruction (Traditional Instruction and Processing Instruction) on online learning of the Past Perfect Tense. More than 160 learners from two elementary classes at a university in Ho Chi Minh City participated in the study with two treatment groups: Traditional Instruction (TI) and Processing Instruction (PI). All the lessons were conducted in a virtual classroom. Pre-test and post-test involving comprehension and production tasks were measured. Overall, the learners who experienced PI gained significantly better results than the TI group in comprehension tasks, while both groups performed similarly in production tasks. Moreover, many features of Processing Instruction are well-suited for the nature of online learning, which benefits learners while they are struggling with virtual classrooms.
加工教学在大学过去完成时在线学习中的效果调查
由于以前接触虚拟学习的机会有限,越南学习者和教师在COVID-19期间在线学习遇到了巨大的困难。本研究的主要目的是开发一种适合虚拟学习的、有效的语法教学方法。为了达到这一目的,本研究比较了两种类型的语法教学(传统教学和加工教学)对在线学习过去完成时的相对效果。来自胡志明市一所大学两个小学班的160多名学生参加了两个治疗组的研究:传统教学(TI)和处理教学(PI)。所有的课程都在虚拟教室进行。测试前和测试后包括理解和生产任务进行测量。总的来说,经历过PI的学习者在理解任务中获得了明显比TI组更好的结果,而两组在生产任务中表现相似。此外,处理教学的许多特点非常适合在线学习的性质,这有利于学习者,而他们正在与虚拟教室作斗争。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信