M. Borenstein, L. Hedges, J. Higgins, Hannah R. Rothstein
{"title":"Simpson's Paradox","authors":"M. Borenstein, L. Hedges, J. Higgins, Hannah R. Rothstein","doi":"10.1002/9780470743386.CH33","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"A prominent university was accused of gender discrimination in its graduate admission policies. The difference seemed to be too large to be due just to chance. Here are the numbers: Gender Applicants % Admitted Men 8,442 44% Women 4,321 35% But an examination of the admissions of individual departments revealed no such bias. Instead, there was a small bias in favor of admitting women. Here are the numbers for the main departments: Department Men Women Applicants % Admitted Applicants % Admitted A 825 62% 108 82% B 560 63% 25 68% C 325 37% 593 34% D 417 33% 375 35% E 191 28% 393 24% F 272 6% 341 7% This occured because women were applying to competitive departments with a low rate of admissions, while men were applying to less competitive departments with high rates of admissions.","PeriodicalId":105695,"journal":{"name":"Introduction to Meta‐Analysis","volume":"83 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2009-03-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Introduction to Meta‐Analysis","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/9780470743386.CH33","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
A prominent university was accused of gender discrimination in its graduate admission policies. The difference seemed to be too large to be due just to chance. Here are the numbers: Gender Applicants % Admitted Men 8,442 44% Women 4,321 35% But an examination of the admissions of individual departments revealed no such bias. Instead, there was a small bias in favor of admitting women. Here are the numbers for the main departments: Department Men Women Applicants % Admitted Applicants % Admitted A 825 62% 108 82% B 560 63% 25 68% C 325 37% 593 34% D 417 33% 375 35% E 191 28% 393 24% F 272 6% 341 7% This occured because women were applying to competitive departments with a low rate of admissions, while men were applying to less competitive departments with high rates of admissions.