Comparação de índices de vegetação entre imagens CBERS, Landsat e Rapideye para área do Cerrado Brasileiro

Lomanto Zogaib Neves, D. Mucida
{"title":"Comparação de índices de vegetação entre imagens CBERS, Landsat e Rapideye para área do Cerrado Brasileiro","authors":"Lomanto Zogaib Neves, D. Mucida","doi":"10.5281/ZENODO.3937479","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This study aims to compare the quality of the NDVI and SAVI indices and their difference maps from images from the CBERS-4, Landsat-8 (lower resolution), and Rapideye-3A (higher resolution) satellites in an area of Cerrado, Minas Gerais, Brazil. First, the two indexes were calculated for the three images, then these maps were reclassified from the pixel range into four classes using the field and MAPBIOMAS project as the criteria. Following the maps of the CBERS-4 indices were compared with the Rapideye-3A correspondent. The same was done with landsat-8 maps. All processes were carried out with images from May 2015 in ArcGIS. CBERS reported results for NDVI similar to Rapideye, but SAVI presented errors. NDVI and SAVI results from Landsat image showed outliers when compared to CBERS and Rapideye data. The CBVI-4 NDVI difference maps indicated an approximation with the Rapideye results demonstrating the quality of the first, despite its lower resolution. The SAVI results were not satisfactory, either by error (CBERS-4) or due to very different values from the reference satellite, probably related to the use of a constant L unable to portray the variety of vegetation.","PeriodicalId":231740,"journal":{"name":"Revista Espinhaço","volume":"23 4","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-06-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Revista Espinhaço","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5281/ZENODO.3937479","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study aims to compare the quality of the NDVI and SAVI indices and their difference maps from images from the CBERS-4, Landsat-8 (lower resolution), and Rapideye-3A (higher resolution) satellites in an area of Cerrado, Minas Gerais, Brazil. First, the two indexes were calculated for the three images, then these maps were reclassified from the pixel range into four classes using the field and MAPBIOMAS project as the criteria. Following the maps of the CBERS-4 indices were compared with the Rapideye-3A correspondent. The same was done with landsat-8 maps. All processes were carried out with images from May 2015 in ArcGIS. CBERS reported results for NDVI similar to Rapideye, but SAVI presented errors. NDVI and SAVI results from Landsat image showed outliers when compared to CBERS and Rapideye data. The CBVI-4 NDVI difference maps indicated an approximation with the Rapideye results demonstrating the quality of the first, despite its lower resolution. The SAVI results were not satisfactory, either by error (CBERS-4) or due to very different values from the reference satellite, probably related to the use of a constant L unable to portray the variety of vegetation.
巴西塞拉多地区CBERS、Landsat和Rapideye图像植被指数的比较
本研究旨在比较CBERS-4、Landsat-8(低分辨率)和Rapideye-3A(高分辨率)卫星在巴西米纳斯吉拉斯塞拉多地区的NDVI和SAVI指数及其差异图的质量。首先对3幅图像计算这两个指数,然后以田野和MAPBIOMAS项目为标准,从像元范围将这些地图重新分类为4类。随后将CBERS-4指数图与Rapideye-3A对应图进行比较。landsat-8地图也是如此。所有过程均在ArcGIS中使用2015年5月的图像进行。CBERS报告的NDVI结果与Rapideye相似,但SAVI出现了错误。与CBERS和Rapideye数据相比,Landsat图像的NDVI和SAVI结果显示出异常值。CBVI-4 NDVI差图与Rapideye结果接近,尽管分辨率较低,但显示了第一种方法的质量。SAVI的结果并不令人满意,要么是由于误差(CBERS-4),要么是由于与参考卫星的值差异很大,这可能与使用常数L无法描绘植被的多样性有关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信