Trade-offs for video-providers in LTE networks: Smartphone energy consumption vs wasted traffic

Christian Schwartz, Marc Scheib, T. Hossfeld, P. Tran-Gia, J. M. Giménez-Guzmán
{"title":"Trade-offs for video-providers in LTE networks: Smartphone energy consumption vs wasted traffic","authors":"Christian Schwartz, Marc Scheib, T. Hossfeld, P. Tran-Gia, J. M. Giménez-Guzmán","doi":"10.1109/SSEEGN.2013.6705394","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Long Term Evolution (LTE) networks provide broadband Internet access to mobile users. One of the main use cases for LTE is a mobile video. When selecting a video transmission mechanism, a video provider has to consider different and orthogonal metrics. The consumer expects a high video Quality of Experience (QoE) and a low energy consumption during download and playback. The video provider is interested in minimizing its resources and corresponding costs, like bandwidth and wasted traffic. Wasted traffic occurs if a user aborts and additional video data is already downloaded but not played out, consuming resources unnecessarily. This raises the questions 1) how a video provider delivers the video contents while reducing the operational costs and satisfying the customers demands 2) what is the influence of the customer abort behaviour. To answer these questions, we first study the influence of mechanism selection on energy consumption and wasted traffic. Second, we show that the different user models do not influence the wasted traffic significantly. Finally, we provide parameter selection guidelines for the Streaming mechanism, which are shown to satisfy better both the requirements of the video provider as well as those of the customer, to achieve Pareto optimal results with regard to the smartphone energy consumption and wasted traffic.","PeriodicalId":167454,"journal":{"name":"2013 22nd ITC Specialist Seminar on Energy Efficient and Green Networking (SSEEGN)","volume":"66 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2013-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2013 22nd ITC Specialist Seminar on Energy Efficient and Green Networking (SSEEGN)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/SSEEGN.2013.6705394","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

Abstract

Long Term Evolution (LTE) networks provide broadband Internet access to mobile users. One of the main use cases for LTE is a mobile video. When selecting a video transmission mechanism, a video provider has to consider different and orthogonal metrics. The consumer expects a high video Quality of Experience (QoE) and a low energy consumption during download and playback. The video provider is interested in minimizing its resources and corresponding costs, like bandwidth and wasted traffic. Wasted traffic occurs if a user aborts and additional video data is already downloaded but not played out, consuming resources unnecessarily. This raises the questions 1) how a video provider delivers the video contents while reducing the operational costs and satisfying the customers demands 2) what is the influence of the customer abort behaviour. To answer these questions, we first study the influence of mechanism selection on energy consumption and wasted traffic. Second, we show that the different user models do not influence the wasted traffic significantly. Finally, we provide parameter selection guidelines for the Streaming mechanism, which are shown to satisfy better both the requirements of the video provider as well as those of the customer, to achieve Pareto optimal results with regard to the smartphone energy consumption and wasted traffic.
LTE网络中视频提供商的权衡:智能手机能耗vs浪费流量
长期演进(LTE)网络为移动用户提供宽带互联网接入。LTE的主要用例之一是移动视频。在选择视频传输机制时,视频提供商必须考虑不同的和正交的度量。消费者希望在下载和播放过程中获得高视频体验质量(QoE)和低能耗。视频提供商感兴趣的是最小化其资源和相应的成本,如带宽和浪费的流量。如果用户终止,并且已经下载了额外的视频数据但没有播放,则会浪费流量,从而不必要地消耗资源。这就提出了以下问题:1)视频提供商如何在提供视频内容的同时降低运营成本并满足客户需求2)客户中止行为的影响是什么。为了回答这些问题,我们首先研究了机制选择对能源消耗和交通浪费的影响。其次,我们表明不同的用户模型对浪费的流量没有显著影响。最后,我们提供了流媒体机制的参数选择指南,该指南能够更好地满足视频提供商和客户的需求,在智能手机能耗和浪费流量方面达到帕累托最优结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信