On becoming a domestic worker the case of Mpumalanga Province, South Africa

T. Thobejane, S. Khosa
{"title":"On becoming a domestic worker the case of Mpumalanga Province, South Africa","authors":"T. Thobejane, S. Khosa","doi":"10.4314/GAB.V14I2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In modern societies, domestic workers play a pivotal role in supporting the labor market and the economy of a country at large through relieving working families of household chores. Given this background Lutz (2007) argues that domestic work is a crucial tool for sustainability and functioning of the economy. Statistics have it that an estimated one third of the world's households rely on domestic workers (Albin, 2011). International Labour Organisation (2010) also echoes the same sentiment noting that, although statistics about domestic workers is scarce, the number of domestic workers worldwide is estimated at over 100 million and is on the rise everywhere. Given the fact that the sector is female dominated, it becomes the main source of employment for women especially in South Africa (ILO, 2010). This is testimony enough to show the significance of domestic workers in many countries. Developed countries have a higher percentage of domestic workers than developing countries (Steedman, 2009). This is mainly due to the labour market structure which absorbs many people regardless of their gender unlike in developing countries where the employment of women was very low until recently when gender equality was advocated. In the wake of the world economic recession, Lutz (2007) suggests that domestic work is an effective alternative employment opportunity for the unskilled labour which cannot be absorbed in other occupations. Despite the importance of domestic work to the modern society, its regulation is still a challenge (International Labor Organization: ILO, 2012). More significantly, the close intimacy between employee and the employer makes the former appear as a family member than a worker. This reduces their value and the measurement of their economic status. Additionally, the fact that domestic work is invisible as it is performed behind closed doors, makes it difficult to regulate (Anderson, 2007). According to Steedman (2009)the fact of legislation vulnerability of domestic workers is historically entrenched, especially in the United Kingdom. In the UK, domestic workers were not included in the legislation for a long time. This was due to the proximity and intimacy to their employers among other reasons. Albin (2011) reports that, in recent years several changes have occurred regarding the legislation in the UK. However, he contends that within these changes there are still many pitfalls which expose domestic workers to economic vulnerability. For instance, they are still omitted from working time regulation in the Regulation 19 of the working time regulation Act. They can also be paid less than the minimum wage when their employer provides them with accommodation. Similarly, Zungu (2009) claims that in Asia, the contribution of domestic workers to the economy is never factored in the Gross National Product. This illustrates that domestic workers are undermined and less valued. This is exacerbated by the fact that they do not have specific working hours or rest periods, receive poor wages and poor standards of work termination among other challenges (Zungu, 2011). These challenges are an evidence of how the legislation irregularities position domestic workers at a disadvantage hence exposing them to economic mistreatment.However, the aforementioned omission does not apply in other countries. For instance in India, the National policy for domestic workers provides domestic workers the right to minimum wage laws, establishment of the number of working hours and rest period as well as social protection and security benefits (Ministry of Labor, 2011). The case of India shows that some countries are taking the plight of domestic workers seriously and are taking necessary steps to protect them from social and economic exploitation.The demand for domestic workers has been on the increase in the past two decades (Gobind, Plessis and Ukpere, 2012). This increase has occurred even in the developing countries where there is a major incorporation of women into the sector (ILO, 2010). …","PeriodicalId":308310,"journal":{"name":"Gender and behaviour","volume":"5 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Gender and behaviour","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4314/GAB.V14I2","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

In modern societies, domestic workers play a pivotal role in supporting the labor market and the economy of a country at large through relieving working families of household chores. Given this background Lutz (2007) argues that domestic work is a crucial tool for sustainability and functioning of the economy. Statistics have it that an estimated one third of the world's households rely on domestic workers (Albin, 2011). International Labour Organisation (2010) also echoes the same sentiment noting that, although statistics about domestic workers is scarce, the number of domestic workers worldwide is estimated at over 100 million and is on the rise everywhere. Given the fact that the sector is female dominated, it becomes the main source of employment for women especially in South Africa (ILO, 2010). This is testimony enough to show the significance of domestic workers in many countries. Developed countries have a higher percentage of domestic workers than developing countries (Steedman, 2009). This is mainly due to the labour market structure which absorbs many people regardless of their gender unlike in developing countries where the employment of women was very low until recently when gender equality was advocated. In the wake of the world economic recession, Lutz (2007) suggests that domestic work is an effective alternative employment opportunity for the unskilled labour which cannot be absorbed in other occupations. Despite the importance of domestic work to the modern society, its regulation is still a challenge (International Labor Organization: ILO, 2012). More significantly, the close intimacy between employee and the employer makes the former appear as a family member than a worker. This reduces their value and the measurement of their economic status. Additionally, the fact that domestic work is invisible as it is performed behind closed doors, makes it difficult to regulate (Anderson, 2007). According to Steedman (2009)the fact of legislation vulnerability of domestic workers is historically entrenched, especially in the United Kingdom. In the UK, domestic workers were not included in the legislation for a long time. This was due to the proximity and intimacy to their employers among other reasons. Albin (2011) reports that, in recent years several changes have occurred regarding the legislation in the UK. However, he contends that within these changes there are still many pitfalls which expose domestic workers to economic vulnerability. For instance, they are still omitted from working time regulation in the Regulation 19 of the working time regulation Act. They can also be paid less than the minimum wage when their employer provides them with accommodation. Similarly, Zungu (2009) claims that in Asia, the contribution of domestic workers to the economy is never factored in the Gross National Product. This illustrates that domestic workers are undermined and less valued. This is exacerbated by the fact that they do not have specific working hours or rest periods, receive poor wages and poor standards of work termination among other challenges (Zungu, 2011). These challenges are an evidence of how the legislation irregularities position domestic workers at a disadvantage hence exposing them to economic mistreatment.However, the aforementioned omission does not apply in other countries. For instance in India, the National policy for domestic workers provides domestic workers the right to minimum wage laws, establishment of the number of working hours and rest period as well as social protection and security benefits (Ministry of Labor, 2011). The case of India shows that some countries are taking the plight of domestic workers seriously and are taking necessary steps to protect them from social and economic exploitation.The demand for domestic workers has been on the increase in the past two decades (Gobind, Plessis and Ukpere, 2012). This increase has occurred even in the developing countries where there is a major incorporation of women into the sector (ILO, 2010). …
关于成为一名家庭佣工——南非姆普马兰加省的案例
在现代社会中,家庭佣工通过减轻工作家庭的家务负担,在支持劳动力市场和整个国家的经济方面发挥着关键作用。在此背景下,Lutz(2007)认为家务劳动是经济可持续性和运转的关键工具。统计数据显示,世界上估计有三分之一的家庭依赖家政工人(Albin, 2011)。国际劳工组织(2010年)也表达了同样的观点,指出尽管关于家庭佣工的统计数据很少,但全球家庭佣工的数量估计超过1亿,并且在各地都在增加。鉴于该部门是女性主导的事实,它成为妇女就业的主要来源,特别是在南非(国际劳工组织,2010年)。这足以证明家政工人在许多国家的重要性。发达国家的家政工人比例高于发展中国家(Steedman, 2009)。这主要是由于劳动力市场结构吸收了许多人,无论其性别如何,这与发展中国家不同,发展中国家的妇女就业率非常低,直到最近才提倡性别平等。在世界经济衰退之后,Lutz(2007)提出,家务劳动是其他职业无法吸收的非熟练劳动力的有效替代就业机会。尽管家务劳动对现代社会的重要性,其监管仍然是一个挑战(国际劳工组织:ILO, 2012)。更重要的是,雇员和雇主之间的亲密关系使前者看起来像家庭成员而不是工人。这降低了他们的价值和衡量他们的经济地位。此外,家务劳动是无形的,因为它是在关起门来进行的,这使得它很难调节(安德森,2007)。根据Steedman(2009)的说法,家庭佣工的立法脆弱性这一事实在历史上是根深蒂固的,特别是在英国。在英国,家政工人很长一段时间没有被纳入立法。这是由于与雇主的距离和亲密关系等原因。Albin(2011)报告说,近年来,英国的立法发生了一些变化。然而,他认为,在这些变化中仍然存在许多陷阱,使家政工人暴露在经济脆弱性之下。例如,在《工作时间调节法》第19条中,他们仍然被排除在工作时间管制之外。当雇主为他们提供住宿时,他们也可以获得低于最低工资的报酬。同样,Zungu(2009)声称,在亚洲,家政工人对经济的贡献从未被计入国民生产总值。这表明,家政工人受到了削弱,价值降低。由于他们没有具体的工作时间或休息时间,工资低,工作终止标准差,以及其他挑战,这一事实加剧了这种情况(Zungu, 2011)。这些挑战证明了立法的不规范如何使家庭佣工处于不利地位,从而使她们遭受经济虐待。但是,上述遗漏在其他国家并不适用。例如,在印度,国家家政工人政策规定家政工人有权获得最低工资法,确定工作时间和休息时间,以及社会保护和安全福利(劳动部,2011年)。印度的情况表明,一些国家正在认真对待家政工人的困境,并正在采取必要步骤保护她们不受社会和经济剥削。在过去的二十年里,对家政工人的需求一直在增加(Gobind, Plessis和Ukpere, 2012)。这种增长甚至发生在妇女大量加入该部门的发展中国家(劳工组织,2010年)。...
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信