Application of 25-National Eye Institute Visual Function Questionnaire in ophthalmological patients

Luciano Mesquite Simmo, Carissa Fouad Ibrahim, Senice Alvarenga Rodrigues Silva, Thai Nunes Andrade, Doora Faleiros Leite, Roberto Ferreira de Almeida Arajo
{"title":"Application of 25-National Eye Institute Visual Function Questionnaire in ophthalmological patients","authors":"Luciano Mesquite Simmo, Carissa Fouad Ibrahim, Senice Alvarenga Rodrigues Silva, Thai Nunes Andrade, Doora Faleiros Leite, Roberto Ferreira de Almeida Arajo","doi":"10.52274/ISPMED20201025","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective: To compare the vision-targeted health related quality of life (HRQOL) between neuro-ophthalmological patients and other eye diseases by the National Eye Institute 25-Item Visual Function Questionnaire. Methods: Cross sectional study with a control group and patients with the following pathologies: primary open-angle glaucoma (POAG), diabetic retinopathy (DR), age-related macular degeneration (ARMD), non-arteritic ischemic optic neuropathy (NAION), intracranial hypertension (IH), optic neuritis (ON), ptosis and cataract. Results: All comparisons of the subscales scores among the control group and the patient groups were statistically significant (p<0.05) except for “ocular pain” (p=0.160), “social functioning” (p=0.052) and “peripheral vision” (p=0.112). The control group had the best scores across all dimensions of the NEI VFQ-25. Interestingly, the ARMD and cataract groups presented the best and worst total scores of NEI VFQ-25, respectively. The lowest subscales scores were found in the cataract, in the NAION/ON, and in the POAG groups. Finally, the comparison between the NAION/ON/IH patients and the other eye diseases did not show statistical significance in any subscale. Conclusion: The NEI VFQ-25 showed the impact of various eye conditions in vision-targeted HRQOL, and no difference was measured between neuro-ophthalmological patients and other eye diseases","PeriodicalId":243745,"journal":{"name":"ISP Medicine","volume":"70 ","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ISP Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.52274/ISPMED20201025","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: To compare the vision-targeted health related quality of life (HRQOL) between neuro-ophthalmological patients and other eye diseases by the National Eye Institute 25-Item Visual Function Questionnaire. Methods: Cross sectional study with a control group and patients with the following pathologies: primary open-angle glaucoma (POAG), diabetic retinopathy (DR), age-related macular degeneration (ARMD), non-arteritic ischemic optic neuropathy (NAION), intracranial hypertension (IH), optic neuritis (ON), ptosis and cataract. Results: All comparisons of the subscales scores among the control group and the patient groups were statistically significant (p<0.05) except for “ocular pain” (p=0.160), “social functioning” (p=0.052) and “peripheral vision” (p=0.112). The control group had the best scores across all dimensions of the NEI VFQ-25. Interestingly, the ARMD and cataract groups presented the best and worst total scores of NEI VFQ-25, respectively. The lowest subscales scores were found in the cataract, in the NAION/ON, and in the POAG groups. Finally, the comparison between the NAION/ON/IH patients and the other eye diseases did not show statistical significance in any subscale. Conclusion: The NEI VFQ-25 showed the impact of various eye conditions in vision-targeted HRQOL, and no difference was measured between neuro-ophthalmological patients and other eye diseases
25份全国眼科学会视力功能问卷在眼科患者中的应用
目的:通过美国国家眼科研究所25项视力功能问卷,比较神经眼科患者与其他眼病患者的视力相关健康生活质量(HRQOL)。方法:横断面研究对照组和以下病理患者:原发性开角型青光眼(POAG)、糖尿病视网膜病变(DR)、年龄相关性黄斑变性(ARMD)、非动脉性缺血性视神经病变(NAION)、颅内高压(IH)、视神经炎(ON)、上睑下垂和白内障。结果:除“眼痛”(p=0.160)、“社交功能”(p=0.052)、“周边视力”(p=0.112)外,对照组与患者组各分量表得分比较,差异均有统计学意义(p<0.05)。对照组在NEI VFQ-25的所有维度上得分最高。有趣的是,ARMD组和白内障组分别表现出NEI VFQ-25的最佳和最差总分。在白内障组、NAION/ON组和POAG组中,亚量表得分最低。最后,NAION/ON/IH患者与其他眼病患者的比较在任何亚量表上均无统计学意义。结论:NEI VFQ-25显示了各种眼病对视力靶向HRQOL的影响,神经眼科患者与其他眼病患者之间无差异
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信