R. Bell, A. Kirkwood, D. Hargrave, A. Michalski, H. Hyare, T. Jacques, S. Stoneham, Y., Chang, N. Fersht, M. Gaze, K. Phipps, A. Shankar
{"title":"Disseminated Low Grade Glioma in Children and Young Adults","authors":"R. Bell, A. Kirkwood, D. Hargrave, A. Michalski, H. Hyare, T. Jacques, S. Stoneham, Y., Chang, N. Fersht, M. Gaze, K. Phipps, A. Shankar","doi":"10.20431/2455-6009.0601002","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Low-grade gliomas [LGG] and in particular, pilocytic astrocytomas, are the most common of childhood tumours of the central nervous system [Bergthold et al 2014 [1], Gupta et al 2017 [2], Ryall et al 2017 [3]]. These are a mixed group of tumours with a World Heath Organization grading of I or II with a generally good outcome [Ryall, et.al, 2017 [3]. Leptomeningeal dissemination [spread via the cerebrospinal fluid [CSF] pathways] is rare with reported incidence of around 5% at diagnosis to 10% at progression [Chamidine et al 2016 [4], Dodgshun et al, 2016 [5], Yecies et al 2018 [6]] Hence, published data is limited on the incidence, natural history, patterns of dissemination or clinical outcome in both children and TYA with disseminated LGG [d-LGG]. While some reports suggest that children with d-LGG have an acceptable treatment outcome [Tsang et al 2017 [7], Chamidine et al 2016 [4], Bian et al 2013 [8], Perilongo et al 2003 [9], Hukin et al 2002], a few other published series depict a more dismal outlook [Von Hornstein et al 2011 [11], Rodriguez et al 2012 [12]]. As the natural history of the disease remains uncertain, it is unsurprising that there is also ambiguity with regard to the most effective treatment for children with d-LGG [Chamidine et al 2016 [4], Gnekov et al 2004 [13], Akar et al 2000 [14]]. In this report, we seek to initiate a dialogue on how this group of patients can best be managed using retrospectively gathered information on treatment outcomes in thirty-six children and adolescents with disseminated disease treated at the London Cancer Paediatric and Adolescent Neuro-Oncology Service [University College and Great Ormond street Hospitals, North London Cancer Network] UK.","PeriodicalId":322132,"journal":{"name":"ARC Journal of Cancer Science","volume":"37 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ARC Journal of Cancer Science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.20431/2455-6009.0601002","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2
Abstract
Low-grade gliomas [LGG] and in particular, pilocytic astrocytomas, are the most common of childhood tumours of the central nervous system [Bergthold et al 2014 [1], Gupta et al 2017 [2], Ryall et al 2017 [3]]. These are a mixed group of tumours with a World Heath Organization grading of I or II with a generally good outcome [Ryall, et.al, 2017 [3]. Leptomeningeal dissemination [spread via the cerebrospinal fluid [CSF] pathways] is rare with reported incidence of around 5% at diagnosis to 10% at progression [Chamidine et al 2016 [4], Dodgshun et al, 2016 [5], Yecies et al 2018 [6]] Hence, published data is limited on the incidence, natural history, patterns of dissemination or clinical outcome in both children and TYA with disseminated LGG [d-LGG]. While some reports suggest that children with d-LGG have an acceptable treatment outcome [Tsang et al 2017 [7], Chamidine et al 2016 [4], Bian et al 2013 [8], Perilongo et al 2003 [9], Hukin et al 2002], a few other published series depict a more dismal outlook [Von Hornstein et al 2011 [11], Rodriguez et al 2012 [12]]. As the natural history of the disease remains uncertain, it is unsurprising that there is also ambiguity with regard to the most effective treatment for children with d-LGG [Chamidine et al 2016 [4], Gnekov et al 2004 [13], Akar et al 2000 [14]]. In this report, we seek to initiate a dialogue on how this group of patients can best be managed using retrospectively gathered information on treatment outcomes in thirty-six children and adolescents with disseminated disease treated at the London Cancer Paediatric and Adolescent Neuro-Oncology Service [University College and Great Ormond street Hospitals, North London Cancer Network] UK.
低级别胶质瘤(LGG),尤其是毛细胞星形细胞瘤,是儿童时期最常见的中枢神经系统肿瘤[Bergthold et al 2014 [1], Gupta et al 2017 [2], Ryall et al 2017[3]]。这是一组混合肿瘤,世界卫生组织分级为I或II,总体预后良好[Ryall等,2017]。轻脑膜播散[通过脑脊液[CSF]途径传播]是罕见的,据报道,诊断时的发病率约为5%,进展时为10% [Chamidine等2016 [4],Dodgshun等2016 [5],Yecies等2018[6]]因此,已发表的数据仅限于儿童和TYA弥散性LGG [d-LGG]的发病率、自然病史、传播模式或临床结果。虽然一些报道表明d-LGG患儿的治疗结果可以接受[Tsang等人2017 [7],Chamidine等人2016 [4],Bian等人2013 [8],Perilongo等人2003 [9],Hukin等人2002],但其他一些已发表的系列报道描绘了更为悲观的前景[Von Hornstein等人2011 [11],Rodriguez等人2012[12]]。由于该疾病的自然史仍然不确定,因此对于d-LGG儿童最有效的治疗方法也存在模糊性[Chamidine等人2016 [4],Gnekov等人2004 [13],Akar等人2000[14]]。在本报告中,我们试图利用在英国伦敦癌症儿科和青少年神经肿瘤服务中心[大学学院和大奥蒙德街医院,北伦敦癌症网络]对36名患有播散性疾病的儿童和青少年进行回顾性收集的治疗结果信息,就如何最好地管理这组患者展开对话。