The Effect of the Perceived Justice of the Performance-Based Annual Salary System on Organizational Effectiveness

Seong-Chul Kim, DaeWoon Cha
{"title":"The Effect of the Perceived Justice of the Performance-Based Annual Salary System on Organizational Effectiveness","authors":"Seong-Chul Kim, DaeWoon Cha","doi":"10.46396/kjem..96.6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Purpose: This study was conducted to examine the influence of organizational justice in the relationship betweenperformance based annual salary and organizational effectiveness using 269 usable questionnaires gathered fromemployees who work in Korea. \nResearch design, data, and methodology: Firstly, exploratory factor analysis was used to assess the validity andreliability of measurement scales. Secondly, Pearson correlation analysis and descriptive statistics were conducted todetermine the collinearity problem, further confirm the validity and reliability of constructs and thus test researchhypotheses. Multiple regression analysis and Dummy regression were used to assess the magnitude and direction ofeach independent variable, and vary the mediating variable in the relationship between many independent variablesand two dependent variables. \nResults: Mutiple Regression analysis showed two important findings: First, performance based annual salary significantlycorrelated with job satisfaction. Second, linking performance based annual salary to organizational justice significantlycorrelated with organizational effectiveness. Statistically, this result demonstrates that organizational justice does act asa partial mediating variable in the relationship between performance based annual salary and organizational effectivenessin the studied organizations. \nImplications: The implications of this study can be divided into three categories: theoretical contribution, robustness ofresearch methodology, and practical contribution. In terms of theoretical contribution, the findings of this studyhighlight three major issues: firstly, Operation of performance based annual salary partially affects “procedural justice”. Secondly, Structure of performance-Based Annual Salary strongly affects “distributive justice”. Thirdly, organizationaljustice(Procedural Justice and Distributive Justice) affect organizational effectiveness. In sum, this study has provided agreat integrated model to understand the influence of perception of organizational justice in performance models ofthe studied organizations.","PeriodicalId":300861,"journal":{"name":"The Korean-Japanese Economic and Management Association","volume":"30 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-08-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Korean-Japanese Economic and Management Association","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.46396/kjem..96.6","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: This study was conducted to examine the influence of organizational justice in the relationship betweenperformance based annual salary and organizational effectiveness using 269 usable questionnaires gathered fromemployees who work in Korea. Research design, data, and methodology: Firstly, exploratory factor analysis was used to assess the validity andreliability of measurement scales. Secondly, Pearson correlation analysis and descriptive statistics were conducted todetermine the collinearity problem, further confirm the validity and reliability of constructs and thus test researchhypotheses. Multiple regression analysis and Dummy regression were used to assess the magnitude and direction ofeach independent variable, and vary the mediating variable in the relationship between many independent variablesand two dependent variables. Results: Mutiple Regression analysis showed two important findings: First, performance based annual salary significantlycorrelated with job satisfaction. Second, linking performance based annual salary to organizational justice significantlycorrelated with organizational effectiveness. Statistically, this result demonstrates that organizational justice does act asa partial mediating variable in the relationship between performance based annual salary and organizational effectivenessin the studied organizations. Implications: The implications of this study can be divided into three categories: theoretical contribution, robustness ofresearch methodology, and practical contribution. In terms of theoretical contribution, the findings of this studyhighlight three major issues: firstly, Operation of performance based annual salary partially affects “procedural justice”. Secondly, Structure of performance-Based Annual Salary strongly affects “distributive justice”. Thirdly, organizationaljustice(Procedural Justice and Distributive Justice) affect organizational effectiveness. In sum, this study has provided agreat integrated model to understand the influence of perception of organizational justice in performance models ofthe studied organizations.
绩效年薪制度公平感对组织效能的影响
目的:本研究使用269份有效问卷,从韩国工作的员工中收集问卷,以检验组织公正在绩效年薪与组织效能之间的关系中的影响。研究设计、资料与方法:首先,采用探索性因子分析评估量表的效度与信度。其次,通过Pearson相关分析和描述性统计来确定共线性问题,进一步确认结构的效度和信度,从而检验研究假设。采用多元回归分析和虚拟回归对各自变量的大小和方向进行评估,并对多个自变量和两个因变量之间的关系进行中介变量的变换。结果:多元回归分析有两个重要发现:第一,绩效年薪与工作满意度显著相关。第二,将绩效年薪与组织公平挂钩与组织有效性显著相关。本研究结果显示,组织公平在绩效年薪与组织效能的关系中扮演部分中介变量的角色。启示:本研究的启示可分为三类:理论贡献、研究方法的稳健性和实践贡献。在理论贡献方面,本研究的发现突出了三个主要问题:第一,绩效年薪的运作部分影响了“程序公正”。其次,绩效年薪结构对“分配公平”的影响较大。第三,组织公平(程序公平和分配公平)影响组织有效性。总之,本研究为理解组织公平感对所研究组织绩效模型的影响提供了一个很好的综合模型。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信