The Language of Evaluation in Jose Saramago's Blindness via Appraisal Theory

R. Kareem, H. Farhan
{"title":"The Language of Evaluation in Jose Saramago's Blindness via Appraisal Theory","authors":"R. Kareem, H. Farhan","doi":"10.30560/ilr.v5n1p25","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Appraisal theory is developed out of systemic functional linguistics as a discourse semantic resource that is concerned with how text producers express their attitudes. The current study is an attempt to expand appraisal framework applicability to a fictional text as modern linguistic studies in the field of appraisal theory have typically been applied to the limited scope of political speeches and debates. The present study strives to illuminate appraisal theory as a tool for analysing the novel Blindness by José Saramago by carrying out three hypotheses. First, appraisal theory can be applied to fictional texts to reveal its genre. Second, in Blindness, appraisal theory shows how the novel’s opening displays a high frequency of pessimistic attitudes. Third, Saramago's most prominent attitude in the beginning of Blindness is judgement. To investigate these hypotheses, the study applied Martin and White’s (2005) framework of appraisal theory to an analysis of 30 extracts as the most representative of the apocalyptic genre. Both quantitative and qualitative methods were applied. Consequently, this study has proven that appraisal framework can be applied to fictional texts to determine the stance and the genre of the text. The findings have also demonstrated that Saramago used an explicit judgment rather than affect or appreciation. Examining the apocalyptic genre and Saramago's attitudes through appraisal theory has led to a new linguistic reading of Blindness unfolding the stances towards the perspectives in the texts and the alignments made to the audience.","PeriodicalId":261061,"journal":{"name":"International Linguistics Research","volume":"277 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-09-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Linguistics Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.30560/ilr.v5n1p25","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Appraisal theory is developed out of systemic functional linguistics as a discourse semantic resource that is concerned with how text producers express their attitudes. The current study is an attempt to expand appraisal framework applicability to a fictional text as modern linguistic studies in the field of appraisal theory have typically been applied to the limited scope of political speeches and debates. The present study strives to illuminate appraisal theory as a tool for analysing the novel Blindness by José Saramago by carrying out three hypotheses. First, appraisal theory can be applied to fictional texts to reveal its genre. Second, in Blindness, appraisal theory shows how the novel’s opening displays a high frequency of pessimistic attitudes. Third, Saramago's most prominent attitude in the beginning of Blindness is judgement. To investigate these hypotheses, the study applied Martin and White’s (2005) framework of appraisal theory to an analysis of 30 extracts as the most representative of the apocalyptic genre. Both quantitative and qualitative methods were applied. Consequently, this study has proven that appraisal framework can be applied to fictional texts to determine the stance and the genre of the text. The findings have also demonstrated that Saramago used an explicit judgment rather than affect or appreciation. Examining the apocalyptic genre and Saramago's attitudes through appraisal theory has led to a new linguistic reading of Blindness unfolding the stances towards the perspectives in the texts and the alignments made to the audience.
从评价理论看萨拉马戈《盲目性》中的评价语言
评价理论是从系统功能语言学发展而来的,作为一种话语语义资源,它关注的是文本生产者如何表达他们的态度。由于评价理论领域的现代语言学研究通常只适用于政治演讲和辩论的有限范围,因此本研究试图将评价框架的适用性扩展到虚构文本。本研究试图通过三个假设来阐明评价理论作为分析约瑟夫·萨拉马戈小说《失明》的工具。首先,评价理论可以应用于小说文本,揭示小说文本的类型。其次,在《失明》中,评价理论表明小说的开头是如何频繁地表现出悲观态度的。第三,《失明》开头萨拉马戈最突出的态度是审判。为了研究这些假设,本研究运用马丁和怀特(2005)的评价理论框架,对30个最具代表性的启示录类型的摘录进行了分析。采用定量和定性相结合的方法。因此,本研究证明了评价框架可以应用于小说文本,以确定文本的立场和类型。研究结果还表明,萨拉马戈使用的是明确的判断,而不是影响或欣赏。通过评价理论考察启示录类型和萨拉马戈的态度,可以对《盲目性》进行新的语言解读,揭示文本中观点的立场和对观众的定位。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信