Social Impact Measurement Methods and Challenges in Practice: A Study on Women Empowerment NGOs

Fatma Köroğlu, Nihan Yıldırım
{"title":"Social Impact Measurement Methods and Challenges in Practice: A Study on Women Empowerment NGOs","authors":"Fatma Köroğlu, Nihan Yıldırım","doi":"10.35609/gcbssproceeding.2022.2(72)","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This study aims to explore the social impact measurement (SIM) methods and the associated challenges from the perspective of women empowerment NGOs in Turkey. Ebrahim and Rangan (2010) define social impact as \"a logic chain of results in which organizational inputs and activities lead to a series of outputs, outcomes and ultimately to a set of societal impacts\", which is a function of measuring the degree of project's success on the way to the women's economic empowerment in this case. Available consultancy and outsourced services on these activities are also limited in Turkey, and the existing services and frameworks are generally performed with manual procedures. Hence, these NPOs need methodologic and practical digital tools to efficiently monitor, assess, and measure those projects' outputs, outcomes, and social impact. These monitoring and measurement activities also matter in the companies or organizations who will invest in these projects to assure the outcomes' worthiness. Despite its significance, there is a lack of human and financial resources and technical support, resulting in ineffective measurement. Research conducted by Yalçın and Güner (2016) on the women's empowerment NPOs in Turkey pointed out an urgent improvement needs since NPOS still face challenges in applying the tools developed in the wide-ocean literature of the social impact measurement. In addition to that, the expectations from non-profit organizations to prove their social impact are rising every day. This brings about a need to assure their sponsors about their good acts and results in order to continue receiving funds from both their present and future donors, even though NPOs' perception towards themselves is the exact opposite of competition among each other (Arvidson & Lyon, 2014). However, the need for social impact arises not only from the funders' satisfaction, but it also emerges for their self-evaluation as Arvidson and Lyon agreed (2014). What is more, NPOs' recognition of how their social value and benefits are in the eyes of their stakeholders like the society and other beneficiaries is indispensable (Polonsky, Grau & McDonald, 2016).\n\n\nKeywords: Social Impact Measurement, Women Empowerment Ngos, Social Entrepreneurship","PeriodicalId":113523,"journal":{"name":"14th GCBSS Proceeding 2022","volume":"56 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"14th GCBSS Proceeding 2022","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.35609/gcbssproceeding.2022.2(72)","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study aims to explore the social impact measurement (SIM) methods and the associated challenges from the perspective of women empowerment NGOs in Turkey. Ebrahim and Rangan (2010) define social impact as "a logic chain of results in which organizational inputs and activities lead to a series of outputs, outcomes and ultimately to a set of societal impacts", which is a function of measuring the degree of project's success on the way to the women's economic empowerment in this case. Available consultancy and outsourced services on these activities are also limited in Turkey, and the existing services and frameworks are generally performed with manual procedures. Hence, these NPOs need methodologic and practical digital tools to efficiently monitor, assess, and measure those projects' outputs, outcomes, and social impact. These monitoring and measurement activities also matter in the companies or organizations who will invest in these projects to assure the outcomes' worthiness. Despite its significance, there is a lack of human and financial resources and technical support, resulting in ineffective measurement. Research conducted by Yalçın and Güner (2016) on the women's empowerment NPOs in Turkey pointed out an urgent improvement needs since NPOS still face challenges in applying the tools developed in the wide-ocean literature of the social impact measurement. In addition to that, the expectations from non-profit organizations to prove their social impact are rising every day. This brings about a need to assure their sponsors about their good acts and results in order to continue receiving funds from both their present and future donors, even though NPOs' perception towards themselves is the exact opposite of competition among each other (Arvidson & Lyon, 2014). However, the need for social impact arises not only from the funders' satisfaction, but it also emerges for their self-evaluation as Arvidson and Lyon agreed (2014). What is more, NPOs' recognition of how their social value and benefits are in the eyes of their stakeholders like the society and other beneficiaries is indispensable (Polonsky, Grau & McDonald, 2016). Keywords: Social Impact Measurement, Women Empowerment Ngos, Social Entrepreneurship
社会影响测量方法与实践挑战——以妇女赋权非政府组织为例
本研究旨在从土耳其妇女赋权非政府组织的角度探讨社会影响测量(SIM)方法及其相关挑战。Ebrahim和Rangan(2010)将社会影响定义为“组织投入和活动导致一系列产出、结果并最终产生一系列社会影响的结果的逻辑链”,这是衡量项目在本案例中妇女经济赋权过程中成功程度的函数。在土耳其,这些活动的咨询和外包服务也很有限,现有的服务和框架一般都是通过人工程序进行的。因此,这些非营利组织需要方法论和实用的数字工具来有效地监控、评估和衡量这些项目的产出、结果和社会影响。这些监视和度量活动对于投资于这些项目的公司或组织也很重要,以确保结果的价值。尽管其意义重大,但缺乏人力和财政资源以及技术支持,导致测量无效。Yalçın和g ner(2016)对土耳其妇女赋权非营利组织的研究指出,由于非营利组织在应用广泛的社会影响测量文献中开发的工具方面仍然面临挑战,因此迫切需要改进。除此之外,非营利组织证明其社会影响力的期望也与日俱增。这就需要向他们的赞助商保证他们的良好行为和结果,以便继续从他们现在和未来的捐助者那里获得资金,即使非营利组织对自己的看法与彼此之间的竞争完全相反(Arvidson & Lyon, 2014)。然而,对社会影响的需求不仅来自于资助者的满意度,也来自于他们的自我评价,正如Arvidson和Lyon所同意的(2014)。更重要的是,非营利组织对其社会价值和利益在社会和其他受益者等利益相关者眼中的认识是必不可少的(Polonsky, Grau & McDonald, 2016)。关键词:社会影响测量、妇女赋权非政府组织、社会企业家精神
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信