Ergonomic Evaluation of Workstation of University Administrative Staff in Rawalpindi and Islamabad

Shanza Fatima, Afnan Farooqi
{"title":"Ergonomic Evaluation of Workstation of University Administrative Staff in Rawalpindi and Islamabad","authors":"Shanza Fatima, Afnan Farooqi","doi":"10.32413/pjph.v13i2.1225","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Workstation ergonomic designs, if inappropriate, can lead to exposure to risk factors of work-related musculoskeletal disorders. The objective of this study was to evaluate workstation ergonomic risk factors of university administrative staff.\nMethods: A descriptive cross-sectional study was conducted on administrative staff workers in the universities of Rawalpindi and Islamabad from July 2021- June 2022. Nonprobability convenient sampling was employed to recruit a sample size of 351 university admin staff employees aged 20 to 60 years, both male and female, who work on computer for 6-8 hours. Data was collected through a self-structured demographic form and Rapid Office Strain Assessment (ROSA) tool. Data was entered and analyzed on SPSS v.21. The results were expressed as descriptive statistics and reported in averages. The qualitative variables were reported as frequencies and percentages.\nResults: The study comprised of 107 (30.5%) females and 244 (69.5%) males with a mean age of 34.80 ± 9.118 years. Results showed that the mean total ROSA score was 6.07 ±1.195. Categorizing the risk level, 242 (68.9%) fell in high risk and only 30 (8.5%) were classified in low-risk and those in the warning zone were 79 (22.5%). The highest at risk score was observed for keyboard and lowest for chair height of workstation. Total ROSA score was highest in administrative accounts department with a mean of 6.47±1.080.\nConclusion: The university administrative staff were at considerably higher risk of developing work-related musculoskeletal disorders due to poor ergonomic computer workstations. The highest score was observed for keyboard placement, followed by back support. Moreover, individuals working in the administrative accounts department were at the highest ergonomic risk.","PeriodicalId":256876,"journal":{"name":"Pakistan Journal of Public Health","volume":"31 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pakistan Journal of Public Health","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.32413/pjph.v13i2.1225","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Workstation ergonomic designs, if inappropriate, can lead to exposure to risk factors of work-related musculoskeletal disorders. The objective of this study was to evaluate workstation ergonomic risk factors of university administrative staff. Methods: A descriptive cross-sectional study was conducted on administrative staff workers in the universities of Rawalpindi and Islamabad from July 2021- June 2022. Nonprobability convenient sampling was employed to recruit a sample size of 351 university admin staff employees aged 20 to 60 years, both male and female, who work on computer for 6-8 hours. Data was collected through a self-structured demographic form and Rapid Office Strain Assessment (ROSA) tool. Data was entered and analyzed on SPSS v.21. The results were expressed as descriptive statistics and reported in averages. The qualitative variables were reported as frequencies and percentages. Results: The study comprised of 107 (30.5%) females and 244 (69.5%) males with a mean age of 34.80 ± 9.118 years. Results showed that the mean total ROSA score was 6.07 ±1.195. Categorizing the risk level, 242 (68.9%) fell in high risk and only 30 (8.5%) were classified in low-risk and those in the warning zone were 79 (22.5%). The highest at risk score was observed for keyboard and lowest for chair height of workstation. Total ROSA score was highest in administrative accounts department with a mean of 6.47±1.080. Conclusion: The university administrative staff were at considerably higher risk of developing work-related musculoskeletal disorders due to poor ergonomic computer workstations. The highest score was observed for keyboard placement, followed by back support. Moreover, individuals working in the administrative accounts department were at the highest ergonomic risk.
拉瓦尔品第和伊斯兰堡大学行政人员工作站的人机工程学评价
背景:工作站符合人体工程学的设计,如果不适当,可能导致暴露于与工作有关的肌肉骨骼疾病的危险因素。本研究的目的是评估大学行政人员的工作站人机工程学危险因素。方法:对2021年7月至2022年6月期间拉瓦尔品第和伊斯兰堡大学的行政工作人员进行描述性横断面研究。采用非概率方便抽样的方法,招募年龄在20 ~ 60岁,在电脑前工作6 ~ 8小时的高校行政管理人员351人。数据通过自结构人口统计表格和快速办公室应变评估(ROSA)工具收集。在SPSS v.21中输入数据并进行分析。结果以描述性统计表示,以平均值报告。定性变量以频率和百分比报告。结果:女性107例(30.5%),男性244例(69.5%),平均年龄34.80±9.118岁。结果ROSA总分平均为6.07±1.195分。高危区242例(68.9%),低危区30例(8.5%),预警区79例(22.5%)。风险得分最高的是键盘,最低的是工作站的椅子高度。ROSA总分以行政会计部最高,平均为6.47±1.080分。结论:高校行政管理人员因使用不符合人体工程学的计算机工作站而患与工作相关的肌肉骨骼疾病的风险较高。得分最高的是键盘位置,其次是背部支撑。此外,在行政会计部门工作的个人面临的人体工程学风险最高。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信