Modified technique of underlay myringoplasty

S. Rastogi, P. Rita, Prasanna Kumar Vd Vasamsetty
{"title":"Modified technique of underlay myringoplasty","authors":"S. Rastogi, P. Rita, Prasanna Kumar Vd Vasamsetty","doi":"10.15406/JOENTR.2018.10.00359","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Two classic methods for Myringoplasty are underlay and overlay techniques each having its advantages and disadvantages.4–5 In the overlay technique, after the elevation of squamous tissue, the graft is positioned lateral to the annulus and fibrotic layer of the tympanic membrane residue. Overlay technique carries a risk of graft lateralization, anterior blunting, delayed healing, stenosis of the external canal, epithelial pearls, and iatrogenic cholesteatoma.6 Despite its higher success in repairing anterior and subtotal perforations, there is a consensus concerning the overlay technique being more technically challenging.7 The underlay technique is perhaps more commonly used worldwide, this technique is easier to perform, lower risk for lateralization, less time consuming, with more acceptable success rate even in the hands of less-experienced surgeons. In this technique, the graft is placed medial to the entire tympanic membrane remnant and also to the malleus handle and is more suitable for posterior perforations.8 This technique has disadvantages including a decreased mesotympanic space, medial displacement of the graft, synaechae formation between graft and promontory and lower success rate in subtotal and anterior perforations.6","PeriodicalId":316775,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Otolaryngology-ENT Research","volume":"129 15","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-09-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Otolaryngology-ENT Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15406/JOENTR.2018.10.00359","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Two classic methods for Myringoplasty are underlay and overlay techniques each having its advantages and disadvantages.4–5 In the overlay technique, after the elevation of squamous tissue, the graft is positioned lateral to the annulus and fibrotic layer of the tympanic membrane residue. Overlay technique carries a risk of graft lateralization, anterior blunting, delayed healing, stenosis of the external canal, epithelial pearls, and iatrogenic cholesteatoma.6 Despite its higher success in repairing anterior and subtotal perforations, there is a consensus concerning the overlay technique being more technically challenging.7 The underlay technique is perhaps more commonly used worldwide, this technique is easier to perform, lower risk for lateralization, less time consuming, with more acceptable success rate even in the hands of less-experienced surgeons. In this technique, the graft is placed medial to the entire tympanic membrane remnant and also to the malleus handle and is more suitable for posterior perforations.8 This technique has disadvantages including a decreased mesotympanic space, medial displacement of the graft, synaechae formation between graft and promontory and lower success rate in subtotal and anterior perforations.6
改良的下膜成形术
两种经典的鼓膜成形术方法是衬底技术和覆盖技术,各有优缺点。4-5在覆盖技术中,鳞状组织抬高后,移植物放置在鼓膜残留物环和纤维化层的外侧。覆盖技术存在移植物侧化、前路钝化、愈合延迟、外管狭窄、上皮珍珠和医源性胆脂瘤的风险尽管覆盖技术在修复前牙和次全牙穿孔方面取得了较高的成功,但人们一致认为覆盖技术在技术上更具挑战性衬底技术可能在世界范围内更常用,该技术更容易执行,侧化风险更低,耗时更少,即使在经验不足的外科医生手中也有更高的成功率。在这种技术中,移植物被放置在整个鼓膜残余的内侧,也被放置在踝柄上,更适合于后部穿孔该技术的缺点包括中鼓室间隙缩小,移植物内侧移位,移植物与海岬之间形成联胞,以及次全穿孔和前穿孔成功率较低
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信