Risk-Taking of Hedge Funds: Empirical Evidence vs. Theoretical Modeling

J. Jackwerth
{"title":"Risk-Taking of Hedge Funds: Empirical Evidence vs. Theoretical Modeling","authors":"J. Jackwerth","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.3827261","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"When an investor delegates portfolio management to a hedge fund manager, whose risk-taking preference governs? Single-period models with option-like incentives suggest stark variation in risk-taking across fund value and time as fund managers maximize their own well-being. Empirical validation is hard to come by, as each hedge fund traces out only a few points on that risk-taking surface. Cross-sectional pooling of normalized returns allows precise estimation of the normalized risk-taking surface. In fact, it is almost flat with some increased risk-taking at very low fund values. A multi-year model is consistent with these findings.","PeriodicalId":416026,"journal":{"name":"Econometric Modeling: Corporate Finance & Governance eJournal","volume":"481 ","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-04-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Econometric Modeling: Corporate Finance & Governance eJournal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3827261","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

When an investor delegates portfolio management to a hedge fund manager, whose risk-taking preference governs? Single-period models with option-like incentives suggest stark variation in risk-taking across fund value and time as fund managers maximize their own well-being. Empirical validation is hard to come by, as each hedge fund traces out only a few points on that risk-taking surface. Cross-sectional pooling of normalized returns allows precise estimation of the normalized risk-taking surface. In fact, it is almost flat with some increased risk-taking at very low fund values. A multi-year model is consistent with these findings.
对冲基金的风险承担:实证与理论模型
当投资者将投资组合管理委托给对冲基金经理时,谁的冒险偏好起支配作用?具有期权类激励机制的单期模型表明,随着基金经理追求自身利益最大化,不同基金价值和时间的风险承担存在明显差异。实证验证很难得到,因为每家对冲基金只在冒险的表面上找出了几个点。归一化收益的横截面池化允许对归一化风险承担面进行精确估计。事实上,在基金价值非常低的情况下,风险承担有所增加,这一比例几乎持平。一个多年的模型与这些发现相一致。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信