Metacognitive writing strategies for vocational high school students

Imas Masyithoh, Eko Suhartoyo
{"title":"Metacognitive writing strategies for vocational high school students","authors":"Imas Masyithoh, Eko Suhartoyo","doi":"10.33474/j-reall.v2i2.11435","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"English writing task for students is considered as the most complex task since they need to combine all English skills on writing construction. Metacognition, the highest order thinking, has to be in writing strategies (planning, monitoring, evaluating). The students who use their metacognition can know which effective writing strategies on doing their writing task. This research aims to elaborate on whether there are significant differences between high and low achievers in writing in using metacognitive writing strategies or not. The researcher selects the Ex-Post Facto research and two instruments; (1) writing test – descriptive text to differentiate between high and low achievers in writing (2) questionnaire – to identify the most and the least uses of metacognitive writing strategies. With the Independent T-test for analyzing the data, the findings are. (1) The uses of metacognitive writing strategies and students’ writing performance are not significantly different. The mean of each strategy had been compared to the mean of students’ performance; moreover, based on the statistical analysis at SPSS, it shows no significant difference. (2)The most used strategy by high and low achievers in writing is planning while the least used strategy is monitoring. From these findings, the null hypothesis is accepted. Although there were no significant differences in the uses of metacognitive writing strategies between high and low achievers in writing, the students have already known effective writing strategies that can improve their writing.","PeriodicalId":416006,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Research on English and Language Learning (J-REaLL)","volume":"381 7","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-07-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Research on English and Language Learning (J-REaLL)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.33474/j-reall.v2i2.11435","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

English writing task for students is considered as the most complex task since they need to combine all English skills on writing construction. Metacognition, the highest order thinking, has to be in writing strategies (planning, monitoring, evaluating). The students who use their metacognition can know which effective writing strategies on doing their writing task. This research aims to elaborate on whether there are significant differences between high and low achievers in writing in using metacognitive writing strategies or not. The researcher selects the Ex-Post Facto research and two instruments; (1) writing test – descriptive text to differentiate between high and low achievers in writing (2) questionnaire – to identify the most and the least uses of metacognitive writing strategies. With the Independent T-test for analyzing the data, the findings are. (1) The uses of metacognitive writing strategies and students’ writing performance are not significantly different. The mean of each strategy had been compared to the mean of students’ performance; moreover, based on the statistical analysis at SPSS, it shows no significant difference. (2)The most used strategy by high and low achievers in writing is planning while the least used strategy is monitoring. From these findings, the null hypothesis is accepted. Although there were no significant differences in the uses of metacognitive writing strategies between high and low achievers in writing, the students have already known effective writing strategies that can improve their writing.
高职学生的元认知写作策略
学生的英语写作任务被认为是最复杂的任务,因为他们需要将所有的英语技能结合在写作结构上。元认知,即最高级别的思维,必须出现在撰写策略(计划、监控、评估)时。使用元认知的学生可以知道哪些写作策略是有效的。本研究旨在阐述高、低水平学生在使用元认知写作策略方面是否存在显著差异。研究者选择事后研究和两种工具;(1)写作测试——用描述性文字区分高、低水平学生的写作水平;(2)问卷调查——识别元认知写作策略使用最多和最少的学生。使用独立t检验来分析数据,结果是。(1)元认知写作策略的使用与学生的写作成绩无显著差异。将每种策略的平均值与学生表现的平均值进行比较;在SPSS软件中进行统计分析,差异不显著。(2)高、低成就者在写作中使用最多的策略是计划,使用最少的策略是监控。根据这些发现,零假设被接受。虽然高分和低分学生在使用元认知写作策略方面没有显著差异,但学生已经知道了有效的写作策略,可以提高他们的写作水平。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信