Multivariate logistic model of hospital length of stay after appendectomy

K. Doklestić, Z. Lončar, Z. Bukumirić
{"title":"Multivariate logistic model of hospital length of stay after appendectomy","authors":"K. Doklestić, Z. Lončar, Z. Bukumirić","doi":"10.5937/medi55-39514","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Appendectomies are interesting because they are the most common emergency abdominal operations, they are considered simple procedures, and the imperative is a quick recovery measured by hospital length of stay (LOS). However, this is not always the case in clinical practice, hospitalization can be prolonged, and the question is what factors affect it. Methods: A multivariant logistic model of LOS predictors analyzed from the clinical data of 446 patients who underwent appendectomy at the Clinic for Emergency Surgery, Belgrade. The patients were divided into Short LOS group (SLOS hospital stay ≤3 days, 157 patients) and Long LOS group (LLOS hospital stay >3 days, 289 patients). Results: Significant differences were found between SLOS and LLOS groups in age (p<0.001), comorbidities (p=0.001), preoperative WBC (p = 0.004); preoperative CRP (p < 0.001); peritonitis (p < 0.001), using ≥ 2 antibiotics (p < 0.001), complicated appendicitis (p < 0.001), surgical time (P < 0.001). No significant difference was found concerning gender, postoperative WBC, CRP, and complications (p>0.05). Patients who underwent laparoscopic appendectomy (LAP) had a statistically significantly shorter hospitalization time compared to those who underwent Mini-Incision Open Appendectomy (MIOA) (p < 0.001). The multivariate logistic model found three statistically significant predictors of longer hospitalization: CRP preoperatively (B=0.006, p=0.047), OR=1.006, the type of surgery (B=1.199; p<0.001), OR=3.3 complicated appendicitis (B=0.762; p=0.003), OR=2.142. Conclusion: Surgical approach has statistically the most significant impact on LOS. Laparoscopic appendectomy is superior to Mini-Incision Open Appendectomy concerning the hospital LOS.","PeriodicalId":167411,"journal":{"name":"Medicinska istrazivanja","volume":"352 ","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Medicinska istrazivanja","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5937/medi55-39514","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Appendectomies are interesting because they are the most common emergency abdominal operations, they are considered simple procedures, and the imperative is a quick recovery measured by hospital length of stay (LOS). However, this is not always the case in clinical practice, hospitalization can be prolonged, and the question is what factors affect it. Methods: A multivariant logistic model of LOS predictors analyzed from the clinical data of 446 patients who underwent appendectomy at the Clinic for Emergency Surgery, Belgrade. The patients were divided into Short LOS group (SLOS hospital stay ≤3 days, 157 patients) and Long LOS group (LLOS hospital stay >3 days, 289 patients). Results: Significant differences were found between SLOS and LLOS groups in age (p<0.001), comorbidities (p=0.001), preoperative WBC (p = 0.004); preoperative CRP (p < 0.001); peritonitis (p < 0.001), using ≥ 2 antibiotics (p < 0.001), complicated appendicitis (p < 0.001), surgical time (P < 0.001). No significant difference was found concerning gender, postoperative WBC, CRP, and complications (p>0.05). Patients who underwent laparoscopic appendectomy (LAP) had a statistically significantly shorter hospitalization time compared to those who underwent Mini-Incision Open Appendectomy (MIOA) (p < 0.001). The multivariate logistic model found three statistically significant predictors of longer hospitalization: CRP preoperatively (B=0.006, p=0.047), OR=1.006, the type of surgery (B=1.199; p<0.001), OR=3.3 complicated appendicitis (B=0.762; p=0.003), OR=2.142. Conclusion: Surgical approach has statistically the most significant impact on LOS. Laparoscopic appendectomy is superior to Mini-Incision Open Appendectomy concerning the hospital LOS.
阑尾切除术后住院时间的多变量logistic模型
背景:阑尾切除术很有趣,因为它是最常见的紧急腹部手术,它们被认为是简单的程序,当务之急是通过住院时间(LOS)来衡量快速恢复。然而,在临床实践中并非总是如此,住院时间可以延长,问题是什么因素影响了它。方法:采用多变量logistic模型对贝尔格莱德急诊外科诊所446例阑尾切除术患者的临床资料进行LOS预测分析。将患者分为短期LOS组(LLOS住院时间≤3天,157例)和长期LOS组(LLOS住院时间≤3天,289例)。结果:SLOS组与LLOS组患者年龄差异有统计学意义(p0.05)。腹腔镜阑尾切除术(LAP)患者的住院时间明显短于小切口开放阑尾切除术(MIOA)患者(p < 0.001)。多因素logistic模型分析发现,术前CRP (B=0.006, p=0.047)、OR=1.006、手术类型(B=1.199;p<0.001), OR=3.3合并阑尾炎(B=0.762;p = 0.003),或者= 2.142。结论:手术入路对LOS的影响具有统计学意义。腹腔镜阑尾切除术优于小切口开放阑尾切除术。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信