Analyzing Social Welfare Facility Employees' Human Rights Violation Decisions from a Restorative Justice Perspective: focusing on the remedy systems of Seoul and Gyeonggi-do province

Soojung Kim
{"title":"Analyzing Social Welfare Facility Employees' Human Rights Violation Decisions from a Restorative Justice Perspective: focusing on the remedy systems of Seoul and Gyeonggi-do province","authors":"Soojung Kim","doi":"10.17924/solc.2023.67.43","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This study examined the importance of the remedy system at human rights organizations with local governments, aiming to provide an improvement plan. It analyzed three cases of human rights violations, settled between 2019 and 2021, of those employed at social welfare facilities of human rights organizations in Seoul and Gyeonggi-do Province from a restorative justice perspective. According to analysis findings, the remedy system of human rights organizations at local governments was implemented based on the participation from victims, perpetrators, and the community. While the system was useful for assisting victims to recover from damages and providing corrective recommendations to perpetrators, there were issues with how it interpreted human rights violations as merely infringements on the freedom of employees, and the actual effectiveness of corrective recommendations issued to perpetrators. With respect to the findings, the following improvements may be suggested from a restorative justice viewpoint. First, more attention and efforts are needed from social welfare facility employees to boost perpetrators' fulfillment of corrective recommendations. Second, the remedy system of local governments' human rights organizations should be strengthened, and lastly, the decisions of human rights violations at local governments should be publicized more widely.","PeriodicalId":409727,"journal":{"name":"Research Institute for Life and Culture Sogang University","volume":"66 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-02-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Research Institute for Life and Culture Sogang University","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.17924/solc.2023.67.43","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study examined the importance of the remedy system at human rights organizations with local governments, aiming to provide an improvement plan. It analyzed three cases of human rights violations, settled between 2019 and 2021, of those employed at social welfare facilities of human rights organizations in Seoul and Gyeonggi-do Province from a restorative justice perspective. According to analysis findings, the remedy system of human rights organizations at local governments was implemented based on the participation from victims, perpetrators, and the community. While the system was useful for assisting victims to recover from damages and providing corrective recommendations to perpetrators, there were issues with how it interpreted human rights violations as merely infringements on the freedom of employees, and the actual effectiveness of corrective recommendations issued to perpetrators. With respect to the findings, the following improvements may be suggested from a restorative justice viewpoint. First, more attention and efforts are needed from social welfare facility employees to boost perpetrators' fulfillment of corrective recommendations. Second, the remedy system of local governments' human rights organizations should be strengthened, and lastly, the decisions of human rights violations at local governments should be publicized more widely.
恢复性司法视角下的社会福利机构职工侵犯人权判决分析——以首尔和京畿道救济制度为例
本研究考察了人权组织与地方政府的救济制度的重要性,旨在提供一个改进计划。从恢复性司法的角度分析了2019年至2021年在首尔和京畿道人权团体社会福利设施工作的3起侵犯人权事件。根据分析结果,地方政府人权组织的救济制度是在受害者、加害者和社区共同参与的基础上实施的。虽然该制度有助于帮助受害者从损害中恢复过来,并向肇事者提供纠正建议,但它如何将侵犯人权行为解释为仅仅侵犯雇员的自由,以及向肇事者发出的纠正建议的实际效力等问题仍然存在。关于调查结果,从恢复性司法的观点来看,可以提出以下改进建议。首先,社会福利机构工作人员需要更多的关注和努力来促进施暴者对纠正建议的履行。第二,加强对地方政府人权组织的救济制度;第三,对地方政府侵犯人权的决定进行更广泛的宣传。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信