Serum Soluble Endoglin Versus Serum Placental Growth Factor for Early Prediction of Preeclampsia

Ali Bendary, M. Elgazzar, L. Mohamed
{"title":"Serum Soluble Endoglin Versus Serum Placental Growth Factor for Early Prediction of Preeclampsia","authors":"Ali Bendary, M. Elgazzar, L. Mohamed","doi":"10.21608/EBWHJ.2021.74864.1134","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Aim: Evaluation of the predictive ability of serum soluble endoglin (sEng) and placental growth factor (PLGF) levels estimated at the 12th gestational week (GW) for discrimination of women liable to develop preeclampsia (PE).Materials and Methods: 102 PE women were diagnosed according to the American Society of Hypertension and categorized according to guidelines of American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. The severity of PE was judged by the difference between blood pressure (ΔBP) measures at time of PE diagnosis and at time of enrolment. Blood samples were obtained at the 12th GW for ELISA estimation of serum sEng and PLGF. Study outcomes included the predictive ability of these markers for development of PE and the relation between age, body mass index (BMI) and serum levels of studied biomarkers and ΔSBP and ΔDBP.Results: 29 and 73 women developed early- and late-onset PE, respectively and 18 women had severe, while 84 women had mild PE. At time of PE diagnosis, BP measures were increased significantly in PE women in comparison to enrolment measures and to control measures. Serum levels of sEng were significantly higher, while serum PLGF levels were significantly lower in PE women than in controls. Development of PE was positively correlated with serum sEng, while was negatively correlated with serum PLGF levels. Also, there was positive significant correlation between ΔBP and BMI and serum levels of sEng, and negative significant correlation with at enrolment BP and serum levels of PLGF. ROC curve analysis defined ΔSBP and ΔDBP by 33 and 10 mmHg as a cutoff point for diagnosis of PE and defined high serum sEng as the significant sensitive predictor for development of PE at both cutoff points.Conclusion: At 12th GW, estimated levels of sEng and PLGF could discriminate pregnant women vulnerable for development of PE. Statistical analyses defined high serum sEng levels estimated at the 12th GW as the significant early predictor for upcoming PE. Maternal obesity and old age are also related to PE severity and must be considered for prediction.","PeriodicalId":224226,"journal":{"name":"Evidence Based Womenʼs Health Journal","volume":"142 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Evidence Based Womenʼs Health Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21608/EBWHJ.2021.74864.1134","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Aim: Evaluation of the predictive ability of serum soluble endoglin (sEng) and placental growth factor (PLGF) levels estimated at the 12th gestational week (GW) for discrimination of women liable to develop preeclampsia (PE).Materials and Methods: 102 PE women were diagnosed according to the American Society of Hypertension and categorized according to guidelines of American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. The severity of PE was judged by the difference between blood pressure (ΔBP) measures at time of PE diagnosis and at time of enrolment. Blood samples were obtained at the 12th GW for ELISA estimation of serum sEng and PLGF. Study outcomes included the predictive ability of these markers for development of PE and the relation between age, body mass index (BMI) and serum levels of studied biomarkers and ΔSBP and ΔDBP.Results: 29 and 73 women developed early- and late-onset PE, respectively and 18 women had severe, while 84 women had mild PE. At time of PE diagnosis, BP measures were increased significantly in PE women in comparison to enrolment measures and to control measures. Serum levels of sEng were significantly higher, while serum PLGF levels were significantly lower in PE women than in controls. Development of PE was positively correlated with serum sEng, while was negatively correlated with serum PLGF levels. Also, there was positive significant correlation between ΔBP and BMI and serum levels of sEng, and negative significant correlation with at enrolment BP and serum levels of PLGF. ROC curve analysis defined ΔSBP and ΔDBP by 33 and 10 mmHg as a cutoff point for diagnosis of PE and defined high serum sEng as the significant sensitive predictor for development of PE at both cutoff points.Conclusion: At 12th GW, estimated levels of sEng and PLGF could discriminate pregnant women vulnerable for development of PE. Statistical analyses defined high serum sEng levels estimated at the 12th GW as the significant early predictor for upcoming PE. Maternal obesity and old age are also related to PE severity and must be considered for prediction.
血清可溶性内啡肽与血清胎盘生长因子早期预测子痫前期
目的:评价血清可溶性内素(sEng)和胎盘生长因子(PLGF)水平在妊娠第12周(GW)时的预测能力,以鉴别易患先兆子痫(PE)的妇女。材料与方法:102例PE妇女根据美国高血压学会诊断,并根据美国妇产科医师学会指南进行分类。通过PE诊断时和入组时血压(ΔBP)测量值的差异来判断PE的严重程度。在12 GW时采集血样用于ELISA测定血清sEng和PLGF。研究结果包括这些标志物对PE发展的预测能力,以及年龄、体重指数(BMI)和所研究生物标志物与ΔSBP和ΔDBP的血清水平之间的关系。结果:早发性PE 29例,晚发性PE 73例,重度PE 18例,轻度PE 84例。在PE诊断时,与入组和对照组相比,PE女性的血压测量明显增加。PE女性的血清sEng水平显著高于对照组,而血清PLGF水平显著低于对照组。PE的发展与血清sEng呈正相关,而与血清PLGF水平负相关。此外,ΔBP与BMI和血清sEng水平呈正相关,与入组时BP和血清PLGF水平呈负相关。ROC曲线分析将ΔSBP和ΔDBP的33和10 mmHg定义为PE诊断的截止点,并将高血清sEng定义为两个截止点上PE发展的重要敏感预测因子。结论:在第12 GW时,估计的sEng和PLGF水平可以区分易患PE的孕妇。统计分析将12 GW时估计的高血清sEng水平定义为即将到来的PE的重要早期预测因子。产妇肥胖和老年也与PE严重程度有关,必须考虑预测。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信