Russia’s Peculiar Labor Market and the Fear of Social Explosion

S. Crowley
{"title":"Russia’s Peculiar Labor Market and the Fear of Social Explosion","authors":"S. Crowley","doi":"10.7591/cornell/9781501756276.003.0002","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This chapter examines how and why Russia adapted to capitalism and deindustrialization through a labor market that avoided mass unemployment, relying instead on extremely flexible wages, and why that system has persisted through subsequent cycles of boom and bust. There are several explanations for the rise of what became known as Russia's labor market model: the legacy of socialist paternalism and the mentality of the working unit as a “labor collective”; the incentives privatization created for managers and new owners; the motivations of regional leaders as they sought to survive the crisis; and above all, the fear of many of a possible social explosion as Russia suffered through an economic decline worse than the Great Depression. While an explosion was avoided, Russia did experience a substantial strike wave, stemming in large part from a crisis of wage arrears. Deindustrialization did indeed take place but without mass unemployment or the closure of most large industrial enterprises. Almost as surprising was the persistence of Russia's model of labor market adjustment into the 2000s. This coincided with a more statist economic approach of the new Russian government.","PeriodicalId":394031,"journal":{"name":"Putin's Labor Dilemma","volume":"412 3","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-07-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Putin's Labor Dilemma","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.7591/cornell/9781501756276.003.0002","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This chapter examines how and why Russia adapted to capitalism and deindustrialization through a labor market that avoided mass unemployment, relying instead on extremely flexible wages, and why that system has persisted through subsequent cycles of boom and bust. There are several explanations for the rise of what became known as Russia's labor market model: the legacy of socialist paternalism and the mentality of the working unit as a “labor collective”; the incentives privatization created for managers and new owners; the motivations of regional leaders as they sought to survive the crisis; and above all, the fear of many of a possible social explosion as Russia suffered through an economic decline worse than the Great Depression. While an explosion was avoided, Russia did experience a substantial strike wave, stemming in large part from a crisis of wage arrears. Deindustrialization did indeed take place but without mass unemployment or the closure of most large industrial enterprises. Almost as surprising was the persistence of Russia's model of labor market adjustment into the 2000s. This coincided with a more statist economic approach of the new Russian government.
俄罗斯特殊的劳动力市场和对社会爆炸的恐惧
本章考察了俄罗斯如何以及为什么通过一个劳动力市场来适应资本主义和去工业化,这个劳动力市场避免了大规模失业,而是依靠极其灵活的工资,以及为什么这个体系在随后的繁荣和萧条周期中持续存在。对于俄罗斯劳动力市场模式的兴起,有几种解释:社会主义家长式作风的遗产和工作单位作为“劳动集体”的心态;私有化给管理人员和新业主带来的激励;地区领导人在危机中求生的动机;最重要的是,随着俄罗斯经历了比大萧条更严重的经济衰退,许多人担心可能发生社会爆炸。虽然没有发生爆炸,但俄罗斯确实经历了一波大规模的罢工浪潮,这在很大程度上源于拖欠工资的危机。去工业化确实发生了,但没有大规模失业或大多数大型工业企业关闭。几乎同样令人惊讶的是,俄罗斯的劳动力市场调整模式一直延续到了本世纪头十年。与此同时,俄罗斯新政府采取了更加中央集权的经济政策。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信