Dyskurs edukacyjny oraz problem dyskursywnego konstruowania tożsamości i wiedzy z perspektywy krytycznej i krytycznie zorientowanej analizy dyskursu

Karolina Starego
{"title":"Dyskurs edukacyjny oraz problem dyskursywnego konstruowania tożsamości i wiedzy z perspektywy krytycznej i krytycznie zorientowanej analizy dyskursu","authors":"Karolina Starego","doi":"10.14746/kse.2017.12.14","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The main purpose of this paper is to present the specific character of educational discourse in terms of the critical (CDA) and critically-oriented discourse analysis (E. Laclau and Ch. Mouffe) and to identify issues and problems that affect research concerning the discursive construction of identity. My main subjects of interest, and the key notions for the discourse-oriented pedagogy, are identity and knowledge. I will try to show how in spite of the relevance of those two notions, the use of discourse analysis in pedagogical research forces us to transcend the narrowly defined disciplinary boundaries. When it is analyzed in a critical manner the thing we call “educational discourse” expands considerably, affecting the scope of both theoretical and research-oriented interests of pedagogy itself. With regard to identity and knowledge, I try to show the inadequacies of the often employed theories of E. Laclau, Ch. Mouffe and M. Foucaul, for analysis of identification processes. I argue that those processes may be successfully analyzed using the CDA framework. The issue of structural constraints that is addressed in CDA, in combination with Laclau’s theory of affective investment allow for a more comprehensive study of the conditions of possibility of the processes of identification.","PeriodicalId":397056,"journal":{"name":"Kultura-Społeczeństwo-Edukacja","volume":"119 48","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-02-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Kultura-Społeczeństwo-Edukacja","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.14746/kse.2017.12.14","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

The main purpose of this paper is to present the specific character of educational discourse in terms of the critical (CDA) and critically-oriented discourse analysis (E. Laclau and Ch. Mouffe) and to identify issues and problems that affect research concerning the discursive construction of identity. My main subjects of interest, and the key notions for the discourse-oriented pedagogy, are identity and knowledge. I will try to show how in spite of the relevance of those two notions, the use of discourse analysis in pedagogical research forces us to transcend the narrowly defined disciplinary boundaries. When it is analyzed in a critical manner the thing we call “educational discourse” expands considerably, affecting the scope of both theoretical and research-oriented interests of pedagogy itself. With regard to identity and knowledge, I try to show the inadequacies of the often employed theories of E. Laclau, Ch. Mouffe and M. Foucaul, for analysis of identification processes. I argue that those processes may be successfully analyzed using the CDA framework. The issue of structural constraints that is addressed in CDA, in combination with Laclau’s theory of affective investment allow for a more comprehensive study of the conditions of possibility of the processes of identification.
本文的主要目的是从批判性话语分析(CDA)和批判性导向话语分析(E. Laclau和Ch. Mouffe)的角度来呈现教育话语的具体特征,并找出影响身份话语建构研究的问题。我主要感兴趣的主题,以及话语导向教学法的关键概念,是身份和知识。我将试图说明,尽管这两个概念存在相关性,但话语分析在教学研究中的应用如何迫使我们超越狭义的学科界限。当我们以批判的方式来分析它时,我们称之为“教育话语”的东西就会大大扩展,影响到教育学本身的理论和研究兴趣的范围。关于认同和知识,我试图展示E. Laclau, Ch. Mouffe和M. Foucaul经常使用的理论在分析认同过程中的不足之处。我认为使用CDA框架可以成功地分析这些过程。CDA中提到的结构约束问题,结合拉克劳的情感投资理论,可以对认同过程的可能性条件进行更全面的研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信