CONCEPTUALIZATION OF STUDENT-FACULTY RELATIONSHIPS IN HEALTH PROFESSIONS EDUCATION: A PRELIMINARY REPORT OF A SCOPING REVIEW

Yosef Eduardo L. Escoto, Alexandra Louise R. Abantao, Maria Mikaela Louise G. Cordero, Bianca Marie C. David, Corina Priscilla C. de Villa, Megan R. Etpison, Jaelen Kyla G. Palomar, K. Perez, Mary Dominique P. Sampan, Engeliko Edgar H. Santos
{"title":"CONCEPTUALIZATION OF STUDENT-FACULTY \nRELATIONSHIPS IN HEALTH PROFESSIONS \nEDUCATION: A PRELIMINARY REPORT OF A \nSCOPING REVIEW","authors":"Yosef Eduardo L. Escoto, Alexandra Louise R. Abantao, Maria Mikaela Louise G. Cordero, Bianca Marie C. David, Corina Priscilla C. de Villa, Megan R. Etpison, Jaelen Kyla G. Palomar, K. Perez, Mary Dominique P. Sampan, Engeliko Edgar H. Santos","doi":"10.46409/002.vocz5360","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction: The aim of this study was to understand how Student-Faculty Relationships (S-FR) has been conceptualized, defined, or operationalized in Health Professions Education (HPED). \nMethods: In a scoping review, the authors searched CINAHL for literature on S-FR in HPEd from the year 2002-2022. Twentynine (29) articles met the inclusion criteria. Explicit content on defining S-FR terminologies were analyzed through thematic analysis. \nResults: Eight similar terminologies in the conceptualization of S-FR, namely teacher-student relationship, student-instructor relationship, caring relationship, advising, coaching, preceptorship, supervision, and mentorship, are identified. Inconsistent use of terminologies implies the lack of a universal framework for S-FR in HPEd. However, most of these terminologies similarly conceptualize S-FR as an interaction between students and faculty centering on faculty guidance and support for students to develop clinical knowledge, skills, and attitude for personal and professional development. \nDiscussion: This review is the first report on the conceptualization of S-FR in HPEd. While several terminologies are used in the studies, conceptualizations are found to be comparable. The context-dependency of S-FR was remarkable among literature as differences in HPEd literature are seen in terms of time frame, degree of formality, setting, and persons involved. Although this may pose a challenge in establishing a universal framework for S-FR, it may also inform researchers to consider these as variables. The results provide a baseline for conceptualizing and operationalizing S-FR in HPEd. Further research is needed to facilitate the development of a universal framework to pave the way for improved academic policies, clinical training, and communication among health professionals and researchers.","PeriodicalId":156633,"journal":{"name":"Philippine Journal of Physical Therapy","volume":"28 15","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-03-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Philippine Journal of Physical Therapy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.46409/002.vocz5360","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: The aim of this study was to understand how Student-Faculty Relationships (S-FR) has been conceptualized, defined, or operationalized in Health Professions Education (HPED). Methods: In a scoping review, the authors searched CINAHL for literature on S-FR in HPEd from the year 2002-2022. Twentynine (29) articles met the inclusion criteria. Explicit content on defining S-FR terminologies were analyzed through thematic analysis. Results: Eight similar terminologies in the conceptualization of S-FR, namely teacher-student relationship, student-instructor relationship, caring relationship, advising, coaching, preceptorship, supervision, and mentorship, are identified. Inconsistent use of terminologies implies the lack of a universal framework for S-FR in HPEd. However, most of these terminologies similarly conceptualize S-FR as an interaction between students and faculty centering on faculty guidance and support for students to develop clinical knowledge, skills, and attitude for personal and professional development. Discussion: This review is the first report on the conceptualization of S-FR in HPEd. While several terminologies are used in the studies, conceptualizations are found to be comparable. The context-dependency of S-FR was remarkable among literature as differences in HPEd literature are seen in terms of time frame, degree of formality, setting, and persons involved. Although this may pose a challenge in establishing a universal framework for S-FR, it may also inform researchers to consider these as variables. The results provide a baseline for conceptualizing and operationalizing S-FR in HPEd. Further research is needed to facilitate the development of a universal framework to pave the way for improved academic policies, clinical training, and communication among health professionals and researchers.
卫生专业教育中师生关系的概念化:范围审查的初步报告
本研究的目的是了解师生关系(S-FR)是如何在卫生专业教育(HPED)中被概念化、定义或操作的。方法:在一项范围综述中,作者在CINAHL检索2002-2022年关于HPEd中S-FR的文献。29篇文章符合纳入标准。通过专题分析,分析了S-FR术语定义的显性内容。结果:师生关系、师生关系、关怀关系、建议、辅导、师徒关系、监督和师徒关系是师生关系概念中的八个相似术语。术语的不一致使用意味着HPEd中S-FR缺乏通用框架。然而,这些术语中的大多数都将S-FR类似地定义为学生和教师之间的互动,其核心是教师指导和支持学生发展临床知识、技能和态度,以促进个人和专业发展。讨论:这篇综述是关于HPEd中S-FR概念的第一篇报道。虽然研究中使用了几种术语,但发现概念化是可比较的。S-FR的语境依赖性在文献中是显著的,因为HPEd文献在时间框架、正式程度、环境和涉及的人方面存在差异。尽管这可能对建立S-FR的通用框架构成挑战,但它也可能告知研究人员将这些因素视为变量。该结果为HPEd中S-FR的概念化和操作提供了基线。需要进一步研究,以促进制定一个普遍框架,为改进学术政策、临床培训以及卫生专业人员和研究人员之间的交流铺平道路。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信