Yosef Eduardo L. Escoto, Alexandra Louise R. Abantao, Maria Mikaela Louise G. Cordero, Bianca Marie C. David, Corina Priscilla C. de Villa, Megan R. Etpison, Jaelen Kyla G. Palomar, K. Perez, Mary Dominique P. Sampan, Engeliko Edgar H. Santos
{"title":"CONCEPTUALIZATION OF STUDENT-FACULTY \nRELATIONSHIPS IN HEALTH PROFESSIONS \nEDUCATION: A PRELIMINARY REPORT OF A \nSCOPING REVIEW","authors":"Yosef Eduardo L. Escoto, Alexandra Louise R. Abantao, Maria Mikaela Louise G. Cordero, Bianca Marie C. David, Corina Priscilla C. de Villa, Megan R. Etpison, Jaelen Kyla G. Palomar, K. Perez, Mary Dominique P. Sampan, Engeliko Edgar H. Santos","doi":"10.46409/002.vocz5360","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction: The aim of this study was to understand how Student-Faculty Relationships (S-FR) has been conceptualized, defined, or operationalized in Health Professions Education (HPED). \nMethods: In a scoping review, the authors searched CINAHL for literature on S-FR in HPEd from the year 2002-2022. Twentynine (29) articles met the inclusion criteria. Explicit content on defining S-FR terminologies were analyzed through thematic analysis. \nResults: Eight similar terminologies in the conceptualization of S-FR, namely teacher-student relationship, student-instructor relationship, caring relationship, advising, coaching, preceptorship, supervision, and mentorship, are identified. Inconsistent use of terminologies implies the lack of a universal framework for S-FR in HPEd. However, most of these terminologies similarly conceptualize S-FR as an interaction between students and faculty centering on faculty guidance and support for students to develop clinical knowledge, skills, and attitude for personal and professional development. \nDiscussion: This review is the first report on the conceptualization of S-FR in HPEd. While several terminologies are used in the studies, conceptualizations are found to be comparable. The context-dependency of S-FR was remarkable among literature as differences in HPEd literature are seen in terms of time frame, degree of formality, setting, and persons involved. Although this may pose a challenge in establishing a universal framework for S-FR, it may also inform researchers to consider these as variables. The results provide a baseline for conceptualizing and operationalizing S-FR in HPEd. Further research is needed to facilitate the development of a universal framework to pave the way for improved academic policies, clinical training, and communication among health professionals and researchers.","PeriodicalId":156633,"journal":{"name":"Philippine Journal of Physical Therapy","volume":"28 15","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-03-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Philippine Journal of Physical Therapy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.46409/002.vocz5360","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Introduction: The aim of this study was to understand how Student-Faculty Relationships (S-FR) has been conceptualized, defined, or operationalized in Health Professions Education (HPED).
Methods: In a scoping review, the authors searched CINAHL for literature on S-FR in HPEd from the year 2002-2022. Twentynine (29) articles met the inclusion criteria. Explicit content on defining S-FR terminologies were analyzed through thematic analysis.
Results: Eight similar terminologies in the conceptualization of S-FR, namely teacher-student relationship, student-instructor relationship, caring relationship, advising, coaching, preceptorship, supervision, and mentorship, are identified. Inconsistent use of terminologies implies the lack of a universal framework for S-FR in HPEd. However, most of these terminologies similarly conceptualize S-FR as an interaction between students and faculty centering on faculty guidance and support for students to develop clinical knowledge, skills, and attitude for personal and professional development.
Discussion: This review is the first report on the conceptualization of S-FR in HPEd. While several terminologies are used in the studies, conceptualizations are found to be comparable. The context-dependency of S-FR was remarkable among literature as differences in HPEd literature are seen in terms of time frame, degree of formality, setting, and persons involved. Although this may pose a challenge in establishing a universal framework for S-FR, it may also inform researchers to consider these as variables. The results provide a baseline for conceptualizing and operationalizing S-FR in HPEd. Further research is needed to facilitate the development of a universal framework to pave the way for improved academic policies, clinical training, and communication among health professionals and researchers.