A Collaborative-Care Telephone-Based Intervention for Depression, Anxiety, and at-Risk Drinking in Primary Care: The PARTNERs Randomized Clinical Trial.

IF 3.3 3区 医学 Q2 PSYCHIATRY
M Ishrat Husain, David J Rodie, Athina Perivolaris, Marcos Sanches, Allison Crawford, Kyle P Fitzgibbon, Andrea Levinson, Rose Geist, Paul Kurdyak, Brian Mitchell, David Oslin, Nadiya Sunderji, Benoit H Mulsant
{"title":"A Collaborative-Care Telephone-Based Intervention for Depression, Anxiety, and at-Risk Drinking in Primary Care: The PARTNERs Randomized Clinical Trial.","authors":"M Ishrat Husain,&nbsp;David J Rodie,&nbsp;Athina Perivolaris,&nbsp;Marcos Sanches,&nbsp;Allison Crawford,&nbsp;Kyle P Fitzgibbon,&nbsp;Andrea Levinson,&nbsp;Rose Geist,&nbsp;Paul Kurdyak,&nbsp;Brian Mitchell,&nbsp;David Oslin,&nbsp;Nadiya Sunderji,&nbsp;Benoit H Mulsant","doi":"10.1177/07067437231156243","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Collaborative care (CC) could improve outcomes in primary care patients with common mental conditions. We assessed the effectiveness of a transdiagnostic model of telephone-based CC (tCC) delivered by lay providers to primary care patients with depression, anxiety, or at-risk drinking.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>PARTNERS was a pragmatic trial in 502 primary care adults presenting with depressive symptoms, anxiety symptoms, or at-risk drinking randomized to (1) usual care by primary care providers (PCPs) enhanced with the results of computer-assisted telephone-based assessments (at baseline and 4, 8, and 12 months later) (enhanced usual care [eUC]) or (2) tCC consisting of eUC plus frequent telephone coaching and psychoeducation provided by mental health technicians who also communicated to the PCP recommendations from a psychiatrist for evidence-based pharmacotherapy, psychotherapy, or, when indicated, referrals to mental health services. The primary analysis compared the change on the 9-item Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-9) in participants presenting with depression (<i>n</i> = 366) randomized to tCC versus eUC. Secondary analyses compared changes on the Generalized Anxiety Disorder-7 scale (GAD-7) in those presenting with anxiety (<i>n</i> = 298); or change in the number of weekly drinks in those presenting with at-risk drinking (<i>n</i> = 176).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>There were no treatment or time×treatment effects between tCC and eUC on PHQ-9 scores for patients with depression during the 12-month follow-up. However, there was a treatment effect (tCC > eUC) on GAD-7 scores in those with anxiety and a time×treatment interaction effect on the number of weekly drinks (tCC > eUC) in those with at-risk drinking.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Implementing transdiagnostic tCC for common mental disorders using lay providers appears feasible in Canadian primary care. While tCC was not better than eUC for depression, there were some benefits for those with anxiety or at-risk drinking. Future studies will need to confirm whether tCC differentially benefits patients with depression, anxiety, or at-risk drinking.</p>","PeriodicalId":55283,"journal":{"name":"Canadian Journal of Psychiatry-Revue Canadienne De Psychiatrie","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.3000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10517649/pdf/","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Canadian Journal of Psychiatry-Revue Canadienne De Psychiatrie","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/07067437231156243","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/2/28 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Background: Collaborative care (CC) could improve outcomes in primary care patients with common mental conditions. We assessed the effectiveness of a transdiagnostic model of telephone-based CC (tCC) delivered by lay providers to primary care patients with depression, anxiety, or at-risk drinking.

Methods: PARTNERS was a pragmatic trial in 502 primary care adults presenting with depressive symptoms, anxiety symptoms, or at-risk drinking randomized to (1) usual care by primary care providers (PCPs) enhanced with the results of computer-assisted telephone-based assessments (at baseline and 4, 8, and 12 months later) (enhanced usual care [eUC]) or (2) tCC consisting of eUC plus frequent telephone coaching and psychoeducation provided by mental health technicians who also communicated to the PCP recommendations from a psychiatrist for evidence-based pharmacotherapy, psychotherapy, or, when indicated, referrals to mental health services. The primary analysis compared the change on the 9-item Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-9) in participants presenting with depression (n = 366) randomized to tCC versus eUC. Secondary analyses compared changes on the Generalized Anxiety Disorder-7 scale (GAD-7) in those presenting with anxiety (n = 298); or change in the number of weekly drinks in those presenting with at-risk drinking (n = 176).

Results: There were no treatment or time×treatment effects between tCC and eUC on PHQ-9 scores for patients with depression during the 12-month follow-up. However, there was a treatment effect (tCC > eUC) on GAD-7 scores in those with anxiety and a time×treatment interaction effect on the number of weekly drinks (tCC > eUC) in those with at-risk drinking.

Conclusion: Implementing transdiagnostic tCC for common mental disorders using lay providers appears feasible in Canadian primary care. While tCC was not better than eUC for depression, there were some benefits for those with anxiety or at-risk drinking. Future studies will need to confirm whether tCC differentially benefits patients with depression, anxiety, or at-risk drinking.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

基于合作护理电话的初级保健抑郁症、焦虑症和高危饮酒干预:合作伙伴随机临床试验。
背景:协作护理(CC)可以改善有常见精神疾病的初级保健患者的预后。我们评估了非专业提供者为抑郁症、焦虑症或有饮酒风险的初级保健患者提供的基于电话的CC(tCC)的跨诊断模型的有效性。方法:PARTNERS是一项在502名初级保健成人中进行的务实性试验,或风险饮酒,随机分为(1)初级保健提供者(PCP)的常规护理(在基线和4、8和12个月后)(增强的常规护理[eUC])或(2)tCC,包括eUC加上心理健康技术人员提供的频繁电话辅导和心理教育,心理健康技术员也传达了PCP的建议从精神病学家那里获得循证药物治疗、心理治疗,或者在需要时转诊到心理健康服务。主要分析比较了9项患者健康问卷(PHQ-9)中抑郁症患者(n = 366)随机分组到tCC与eUC。二次分析比较了焦虑患者(n = 298);或有饮酒风险的人每周饮酒次数的变化(n = 176)。结果:在12个月的随访中,tCC和eUC对抑郁症患者PHQ-9评分没有治疗或时间×治疗效果。然而,有治疗效果(tCC > eUC)对焦虑症患者GAD-7评分的影响以及时间×治疗交互作用对每周饮酒次数的影响(tCC > eUC)。结论:在加拿大初级保健中,使用非专业提供者对常见精神障碍实施跨诊断tCC似乎是可行的。虽然tCC在抑郁症方面并不比eUC好,但对那些有焦虑或饮酒风险的人来说还是有一些好处的。未来的研究需要确认tCC是否对抑郁症、焦虑症或有饮酒风险的患者有不同的益处。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.00
自引率
2.50%
发文量
69
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Established in 1956, The Canadian Journal of Psychiatry (The CJP) has been keeping psychiatrists up-to-date on the latest research for nearly 60 years. The CJP provides a forum for psychiatry and mental health professionals to share their findings with researchers and clinicians. The CJP includes peer-reviewed scientific articles analyzing ongoing developments in Canadian and international psychiatry.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信