Longitudinal Analysis of Eye Health Disparities Due to Trachoma Using Country-Level Data from the Global Burden of Disease Study 2019.

IF 1.7 4区 医学 Q3 OPHTHALMOLOGY
Ophthalmic epidemiology Pub Date : 2024-12-01 Epub Date: 2023-03-07 DOI:10.1080/09286586.2023.2188561
Koichi Ono, Reiko Umeya
{"title":"Longitudinal Analysis of Eye Health Disparities Due to Trachoma Using Country-Level Data from the Global Burden of Disease Study 2019.","authors":"Koichi Ono, Reiko Umeya","doi":"10.1080/09286586.2023.2188561","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To assess the change in eye health disparities due to trachoma using longitudinal country-level data (1990-2019) from the global burden of disease study 2019.</p><p><strong>Methods:statement: </strong>We obtained data on the burden of trachoma and population statistics from the Global Health Data Exchange website. We assessed the geographic distribution of trachoma at the global level and World Bank regional level from year to year using Gini coefficients and statistics of inequality that ranged from 0 (total equality) to 1 (total inequality).</p><p><strong>Result: </strong>We found that 60 countries and territories had a burden of trachoma, and these were from all regions except Central Europe, Eastern Europe, and Central Asia. At the global level, the Gini coefficient had increased from 0.546 to 0.637 (p for trend: <0.001) in the last three decades, while the mean disability-adjusted life years (DALYs) per 100,000 people declined from 13.0 to 3.2 (p for trend: <0.001). The inequality statistics had significantly worsened in South Asia and Sub-Saharan Africa (p for trend: <0.001) despite the decrease in the mean DALYs per capita.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Our study revealed that the burden of trachoma dramatically decreased; however, the eye health inequality due to trachoma increased globally and in two of the most endemic regions in the last three decades. Global eye health experts need to monitor the distribution of eye diseases and ensure appropriate, effective, uniform, and high-quality eye care for all.</p>","PeriodicalId":19607,"journal":{"name":"Ophthalmic epidemiology","volume":" ","pages":"491-497"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ophthalmic epidemiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/09286586.2023.2188561","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/3/7 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"OPHTHALMOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: To assess the change in eye health disparities due to trachoma using longitudinal country-level data (1990-2019) from the global burden of disease study 2019.

Methods:statement: We obtained data on the burden of trachoma and population statistics from the Global Health Data Exchange website. We assessed the geographic distribution of trachoma at the global level and World Bank regional level from year to year using Gini coefficients and statistics of inequality that ranged from 0 (total equality) to 1 (total inequality).

Result: We found that 60 countries and territories had a burden of trachoma, and these were from all regions except Central Europe, Eastern Europe, and Central Asia. At the global level, the Gini coefficient had increased from 0.546 to 0.637 (p for trend: <0.001) in the last three decades, while the mean disability-adjusted life years (DALYs) per 100,000 people declined from 13.0 to 3.2 (p for trend: <0.001). The inequality statistics had significantly worsened in South Asia and Sub-Saharan Africa (p for trend: <0.001) despite the decrease in the mean DALYs per capita.

Conclusion: Our study revealed that the burden of trachoma dramatically decreased; however, the eye health inequality due to trachoma increased globally and in two of the most endemic regions in the last three decades. Global eye health experts need to monitor the distribution of eye diseases and ensure appropriate, effective, uniform, and high-quality eye care for all.

利用《2019 年全球疾病负担研究》(Global Burden of Disease Study 2019)中的国家级数据对沙眼导致的眼健康差异进行纵向分析。
目的:利用2019年全球疾病负担研究的纵向国家级数据(1990-2019年),评估沙眼导致的眼健康差异的变化:我们从全球健康数据交换网站获取了沙眼负担数据和人口统计数据。我们使用基尼系数和从 0(完全平等)到 1(完全不平等)的不平等统计数据,评估了沙眼在全球层面和世界银行地区层面逐年的地理分布情况:结果:我们发现有 60 个国家和地区存在沙眼负担,这些国家和地区来自除中欧、东欧和中亚以外的所有地区。在全球范围内,基尼系数从 0.546 上升至 0.637(P 为趋势):结论:我们的研究表明,沙眼造成的负担急剧下降;然而,在过去三十年中,全球以及两个沙眼流行最严重地区的眼健康不平等现象却有所加剧。全球眼健康专家需要监测眼病的分布情况,确保为所有人提供适当、有效、统一和高质量的眼保健服务。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Ophthalmic epidemiology
Ophthalmic epidemiology 医学-眼科学
CiteScore
3.70
自引率
5.60%
发文量
61
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Ophthalmic Epidemiology is dedicated to the publication of original research into eye and vision health in the fields of epidemiology, public health and the prevention of blindness. Ophthalmic Epidemiology publishes editorials, original research reports, systematic reviews and meta-analysis articles, brief communications and letters to the editor on all subjects related to ophthalmic epidemiology. A broad range of topics is suitable, such as: evaluating the risk of ocular diseases, general and specific study designs, screening program implementation and evaluation, eye health care access, delivery and outcomes, therapeutic efficacy or effectiveness, disease prognosis and quality of life, cost-benefit analysis, biostatistical theory and risk factor analysis. We are looking to expand our engagement with reports of international interest, including those regarding problems affecting developing countries, although reports from all over the world potentially are suitable. Clinical case reports, small case series (not enough for a cohort analysis) articles and animal research reports are not appropriate for this journal.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信