Evaluation of Analgesic Efficacy of Ultrasound-Guided Adductor Canal Block With 20 mL of 0.5% Ropivacaine in Patients Undergoing Knee Surgeries-A Randomized Control Trial.

Q3 Medicine
Pavithra Arumugam, Saravanan Ravi, Sundaram Ln, Prasanna Manickam, Karthik Kanthan
{"title":"Evaluation of Analgesic Efficacy of Ultrasound-Guided Adductor Canal Block With 20 mL of 0.5% Ropivacaine in Patients Undergoing Knee Surgeries-A Randomized Control Trial.","authors":"Pavithra Arumugam,&nbsp;Saravanan Ravi,&nbsp;Sundaram Ln,&nbsp;Prasanna Manickam,&nbsp;Karthik Kanthan","doi":"10.6859/aja.202212_60(4).0001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Adductor canal block (ACB) is a motor sparing block providing analgesia for surgeries involving anterior part of the knee. The aim of our study was to evaluate the analgesic efficacy of ACB to reduce pain in arthroscopic knee surgeries done under spinal anesthesia. Our primary objective was to evaluate the 24 hours postoperative morphine consumption. The secondary objectives were to evaluate the visual analog scale (VAS) scores at rest and during knee flexion, hemodynamics and side effects of the block.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In this prospective randomised controlled trial, 70 patients who underwent arthroscopic knee surgeries were randomly divided into two groups, A and C. Surgeries were done under spinal anesthesia. Group A patients received ACB with 20 mL of 0.5 % ropivacaine using ultrasound postoperatively. Block was not performed in group C. The amount of morphine consumption in PCA pump, duration of analgesia, mean VAS scores at rest and flexion, hemodynamics and adverse effects were monitored.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The average morphine consumption was significantly lesser with a P-value < 0.001 in group A (8.628 ± 2.001 mg) when compared to group C (21.914 ± 5.118 mg). The duration of analgesia was longer in group A (365.71 ± 53.648 min vs. 150.429 ± 22.537 min) with highly significant P-value of < 0.001. Group A patients had significantly decreased VAS scores at rest and knee flexion and better haemodynamic stability.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>We conclude that ultrasound-guided ACB resulted in significantly lesser morphine consumption after arthroscopic knee surgeries. ACB prolonged the duration of analgesia with better hemodynamics, lesser VAS pain scores and with no complications.</p>","PeriodicalId":8482,"journal":{"name":"Asian journal of anesthesiology","volume":"60 4","pages":"123-130"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Asian journal of anesthesiology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.6859/aja.202212_60(4).0001","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Adductor canal block (ACB) is a motor sparing block providing analgesia for surgeries involving anterior part of the knee. The aim of our study was to evaluate the analgesic efficacy of ACB to reduce pain in arthroscopic knee surgeries done under spinal anesthesia. Our primary objective was to evaluate the 24 hours postoperative morphine consumption. The secondary objectives were to evaluate the visual analog scale (VAS) scores at rest and during knee flexion, hemodynamics and side effects of the block.

Methods: In this prospective randomised controlled trial, 70 patients who underwent arthroscopic knee surgeries were randomly divided into two groups, A and C. Surgeries were done under spinal anesthesia. Group A patients received ACB with 20 mL of 0.5 % ropivacaine using ultrasound postoperatively. Block was not performed in group C. The amount of morphine consumption in PCA pump, duration of analgesia, mean VAS scores at rest and flexion, hemodynamics and adverse effects were monitored.

Results: The average morphine consumption was significantly lesser with a P-value < 0.001 in group A (8.628 ± 2.001 mg) when compared to group C (21.914 ± 5.118 mg). The duration of analgesia was longer in group A (365.71 ± 53.648 min vs. 150.429 ± 22.537 min) with highly significant P-value of < 0.001. Group A patients had significantly decreased VAS scores at rest and knee flexion and better haemodynamic stability.

Conclusions: We conclude that ultrasound-guided ACB resulted in significantly lesser morphine consumption after arthroscopic knee surgeries. ACB prolonged the duration of analgesia with better hemodynamics, lesser VAS pain scores and with no complications.

超声引导下20ml 0.5%罗哌卡因内收管阻滞对膝关节手术患者镇痛效果的评价——随机对照试验。
背景:内收管阻滞(ACB)是一种运动保留阻滞,为涉及膝关节前部的手术提供镇痛。本研究的目的是评估ACB在脊柱麻醉下关节镜膝关节手术中减轻疼痛的镇痛效果。我们的主要目的是评估术后24小时吗啡用量。次要目的是评估休息和膝关节屈曲时的视觉模拟评分、血流动力学和阻滞的副作用。方法:本前瞻性随机对照试验将70例膝关节镜手术患者随机分为A组和c组。手术均在脊髓麻醉下进行。A组患者术后超声给予0.5%罗哌卡因20 mL ACB。c组不进行阻滞,监测PCA泵吗啡用量、镇痛时间、静止和屈曲时VAS平均评分、血流动力学和不良反应。结果:a组吗啡平均用量(8.628±2.001 mg)显著低于C组(21.914±5.118 mg), p值< 0.001。A组镇痛时间更长(365.71±53.648 min∶150.429±22.537 min), p值< 0.001,差异有高度统计学意义。A组患者休息和膝关节屈曲时VAS评分明显降低,血流动力学稳定性较好。结论:超声引导下的ACB可显著减少膝关节镜手术后吗啡的消耗。ACB延长了镇痛时间,血流动力学更好,VAS疼痛评分更低,无并发症。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Asian journal of anesthesiology
Asian journal of anesthesiology Medicine-Medicine (all)
CiteScore
1.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
38
期刊介绍: Asian Journal of Anesthesiology (AJA), launched in 1962, is the official and peer-reviewed publication of the Taiwan Society of Anaesthesiologists. It is published quarterly (March/June/September/December) by Airiti and indexed in EMBASE, Medline, Scopus, ScienceDirect, SIIC Data Bases. AJA accepts submissions from around the world. AJA is the premier open access journal in the field of anaesthesia and its related disciplines of critical care and pain in Asia. The number of Chinese anaesthesiologists has reached more than 60,000 and is still growing. The journal aims to disseminate anaesthesiology research and services for the Chinese community and is now the main anaesthesiology journal for Chinese societies located in Taiwan, Mainland China, Hong Kong and Singapore. AJAcaters to clinicians of all relevant specialties and biomedical scientists working in the areas of anesthesia, critical care medicine and pain management, as well as other related fields (pharmacology, pathology molecular biology, etc). AJA''s editorial team is composed of local and regional experts in the field as well as many leading international experts. Article types accepted include review articles, research papers, short communication, correspondence and images.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信