Glucagon-Like Peptide 1 Receptor Agonists and Risk of Anaphylactic Reaction Among Patients With Type 2 Diabetes: A Multisite Population-Based Cohort Study.

IF 5 2区 医学 Q1 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
Richeek Pradhan, Elisabetta Patorno, Helen Tesfaye, Sebastian Schneeweiss, Hui Yin, Jessica Franklin, Ajinkya Pawar, Christina Santella, Oriana H Y Yu, Christel Renoux, Laurent Azoulay
{"title":"Glucagon-Like Peptide 1 Receptor Agonists and Risk of Anaphylactic Reaction Among Patients With Type 2 Diabetes: A Multisite Population-Based Cohort Study.","authors":"Richeek Pradhan,&nbsp;Elisabetta Patorno,&nbsp;Helen Tesfaye,&nbsp;Sebastian Schneeweiss,&nbsp;Hui Yin,&nbsp;Jessica Franklin,&nbsp;Ajinkya Pawar,&nbsp;Christina Santella,&nbsp;Oriana H Y Yu,&nbsp;Christel Renoux,&nbsp;Laurent Azoulay","doi":"10.1093/aje/kwac021","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Case reports and a pharmacovigilance analysis have linked glucagon-like peptide 1 receptor agonists (GLP-1 RAs) with anaphylactic reactions, but real-world evidence for this possible association is lacking. Using databases from the United Kingdom (Clinical Practice Research Datalink) and the United States (Medicare, Optum (Optum, Inc., Eden Prairie, Minnesota), and IBM MarketScan (IBM, Armonk, New York)), we employed a new-user, active comparator study design wherein initiators of GLP-1 RAs were compared with 2 different active comparator groups (initiators of dipeptidyl peptidase 4 (DPP-4) inhibitors and initiators of sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 (SGLT-2) inhibitors) between 2007 and 2019. Propensity score fine stratification weighted Cox proportional hazards models were fitted to estimate hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for an anaphylactic reaction. Database-specific HRs were pooled using random-effects models. Compared with the use of DPP-4 inhibitors (n = 1,641,520), use of GLP-1 RAs (n = 324,098) generated a modest increase in the HR for anaphylactic reaction, with a wide 95% CI (36.9 per 100,000 person-years vs. 32.1 per 100,000 person-years, respectively; HR = 1.15, 95% CI: 0.94, 1.42). Compared with SGLT-2 inhibitors (n = 366,067), GLP-1 RAs (n = 259,929) were associated with a 38% increased risk of anaphylactic reaction (40.7 per 100,000 person-years vs. 29.4 per 100,000 person-years, respectively; HR = 1.38, 95% CI: 1.02, 1.87). In this large, multisite population-based cohort study, GLP-1 RAs were associated with a modestly increased risk of anaphylactic reaction when compared with DPP-4 inhibitors and SGLT-2 inhibitors.</p>","PeriodicalId":7472,"journal":{"name":"American journal of epidemiology","volume":"191 8","pages":"1352-1367"},"PeriodicalIF":5.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-07-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9989345/pdf/kwac021.pdf","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American journal of epidemiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/aje/kwac021","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Case reports and a pharmacovigilance analysis have linked glucagon-like peptide 1 receptor agonists (GLP-1 RAs) with anaphylactic reactions, but real-world evidence for this possible association is lacking. Using databases from the United Kingdom (Clinical Practice Research Datalink) and the United States (Medicare, Optum (Optum, Inc., Eden Prairie, Minnesota), and IBM MarketScan (IBM, Armonk, New York)), we employed a new-user, active comparator study design wherein initiators of GLP-1 RAs were compared with 2 different active comparator groups (initiators of dipeptidyl peptidase 4 (DPP-4) inhibitors and initiators of sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 (SGLT-2) inhibitors) between 2007 and 2019. Propensity score fine stratification weighted Cox proportional hazards models were fitted to estimate hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for an anaphylactic reaction. Database-specific HRs were pooled using random-effects models. Compared with the use of DPP-4 inhibitors (n = 1,641,520), use of GLP-1 RAs (n = 324,098) generated a modest increase in the HR for anaphylactic reaction, with a wide 95% CI (36.9 per 100,000 person-years vs. 32.1 per 100,000 person-years, respectively; HR = 1.15, 95% CI: 0.94, 1.42). Compared with SGLT-2 inhibitors (n = 366,067), GLP-1 RAs (n = 259,929) were associated with a 38% increased risk of anaphylactic reaction (40.7 per 100,000 person-years vs. 29.4 per 100,000 person-years, respectively; HR = 1.38, 95% CI: 1.02, 1.87). In this large, multisite population-based cohort study, GLP-1 RAs were associated with a modestly increased risk of anaphylactic reaction when compared with DPP-4 inhibitors and SGLT-2 inhibitors.

胰高血糖素样肽1受体激动剂和2型糖尿病患者过敏反应的风险:一项多地点人群队列研究
病例报告和药物警戒分析将胰高血糖素样肽1受体激动剂(GLP-1 RAs)与过敏反应联系起来,但缺乏这种可能关联的现实证据。使用来自英国(临床实践研究数据链)和美国(Medicare, Optum (Optum, Inc., Eden Prairie, Minnesota)和IBM MarketScan (IBM, Armonk, New York))的数据库,我们采用了一种新用户、活性比较剂研究设计,其中GLP-1 RAs的启动剂与2007年至2019年间2个不同的活性比较剂组(二肽基肽酶4 (DPP-4)抑制剂的启动剂和钠-葡萄糖共转运蛋白2 (SGLT-2)抑制剂的启动剂)进行比较。拟合倾向评分精细分层加权Cox比例风险模型来估计过敏反应的风险比(hr)和95%置信区间(ci)。使用随机效应模型对数据库特定的hr进行汇总。与使用DPP-4抑制剂(n = 1,641,520)相比,使用GLP-1 RAs (n = 324,098)产生过敏反应的HR适度增加,95% CI宽(分别为36.9 / 100,000人年和32.1 / 100,000人年;Hr = 1.15, 95% ci: 0.94, 1.42)。与SGLT-2抑制剂(n = 366,067)相比,GLP-1 RAs (n = 259,929)与过敏反应风险增加38%相关(分别为40.7 / 100,000人年和29.4 / 100,000人年;Hr = 1.38, 95% ci: 1.02, 1.87)。在这项大型、多地点人群队列研究中,与DPP-4抑制剂和SGLT-2抑制剂相比,GLP-1 RAs与轻度增加的过敏反应风险相关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
American journal of epidemiology
American journal of epidemiology 医学-公共卫生、环境卫生与职业卫生
CiteScore
7.40
自引率
4.00%
发文量
221
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: The American Journal of Epidemiology is the oldest and one of the premier epidemiologic journals devoted to the publication of empirical research findings, opinion pieces, and methodological developments in the field of epidemiologic research. It is a peer-reviewed journal aimed at both fellow epidemiologists and those who use epidemiologic data, including public health workers and clinicians.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信