A Cross-sectional Study of Regret in Cancer Patients After Sharing Test Results for Pathogenic Germline Variants of Hereditary Cancers With Relatives.

IF 2.4 3区 医学 Q1 NURSING
Cancer Nursing Pub Date : 2024-07-01 Epub Date: 2023-03-07 DOI:10.1097/NCC.0000000000001224
Naomi Fukuzaki, Yoshimi Kiyozumi, Satomi Higashigawa, Yasue Horiuchi, Hiroyuki Matsubayashi, Seiichiro Nishimura, Keita Mori, Akifumi Notsu, Izumi Suishu, Sumiko Ohnami, Masatoshi Kusuhara, Ken Yamaguchi, Ardith Z Doorenbos, Yuko Takeda
{"title":"A Cross-sectional Study of Regret in Cancer Patients After Sharing Test Results for Pathogenic Germline Variants of Hereditary Cancers With Relatives.","authors":"Naomi Fukuzaki, Yoshimi Kiyozumi, Satomi Higashigawa, Yasue Horiuchi, Hiroyuki Matsubayashi, Seiichiro Nishimura, Keita Mori, Akifumi Notsu, Izumi Suishu, Sumiko Ohnami, Masatoshi Kusuhara, Ken Yamaguchi, Ardith Z Doorenbos, Yuko Takeda","doi":"10.1097/NCC.0000000000001224","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Research on whole genome/exome sequencing is increasing worldwide. However, challenges are emerging in relation to receiving germline pathogenic variant results and sharing them with relatives.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>The aim of this study was to investigate the occurrence of and reasoning related to regret among patients with cancer who shared single-gene testing results and whole exome sequencing with family members.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This was a single-center, cross-sectional study. The Decision Regret Scale was administered, and descriptive questionnaires were used with 21 patients with cancer.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Eight patients were classified as having no regret, 9 patients were classified as having mild regret, and 4 patients were classified as having moderate to strong regret. Reasons patients felt that sharing was the right decision included the following: to allow relatives and children to take preventive measures, the need for both parties to be aware of and ready for the hereditary transmission of cancer, and the need to be able to discuss the situation with others. On the other hand, some patients did not think it was a good decision to share the information because of the associated anxiety.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Regret over sharing test results for pathogenic germline variants of hereditary cancers with relatives tended to be low. The main reason was that patients believed that they were able to benefit others by sharing.</p><p><strong>Implications for practice: </strong>Healthcare professionals need to understand the postsharing perceptions and experiences of patients and support them throughout the sharing process.</p>","PeriodicalId":50713,"journal":{"name":"Cancer Nursing","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cancer Nursing","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/NCC.0000000000001224","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/3/7 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Research on whole genome/exome sequencing is increasing worldwide. However, challenges are emerging in relation to receiving germline pathogenic variant results and sharing them with relatives.

Objective: The aim of this study was to investigate the occurrence of and reasoning related to regret among patients with cancer who shared single-gene testing results and whole exome sequencing with family members.

Methods: This was a single-center, cross-sectional study. The Decision Regret Scale was administered, and descriptive questionnaires were used with 21 patients with cancer.

Results: Eight patients were classified as having no regret, 9 patients were classified as having mild regret, and 4 patients were classified as having moderate to strong regret. Reasons patients felt that sharing was the right decision included the following: to allow relatives and children to take preventive measures, the need for both parties to be aware of and ready for the hereditary transmission of cancer, and the need to be able to discuss the situation with others. On the other hand, some patients did not think it was a good decision to share the information because of the associated anxiety.

Conclusions: Regret over sharing test results for pathogenic germline variants of hereditary cancers with relatives tended to be low. The main reason was that patients believed that they were able to benefit others by sharing.

Implications for practice: Healthcare professionals need to understand the postsharing perceptions and experiences of patients and support them throughout the sharing process.

一项关于癌症患者与亲属共享遗传性癌症致病基因变异检测结果后后悔的横断面研究。
背景:全基因组/外显子组测序研究在全球范围内日益增多。然而,在接受种系致病变异结果并与亲属分享这些结果方面,挑战也在不断出现:本研究旨在调查与家人分享单基因检测结果和全外显子组测序结果的癌症患者后悔的发生率和相关原因:这是一项单中心横断面研究。方法:这是一项单中心横断面研究,对 21 名癌症患者进行了决策后悔量表和描述性问卷调查:结果:8 名患者被归类为无遗憾,9 名患者被归类为轻度遗憾,4 名患者被归类为中度至强烈遗憾。患者认为共用器官是正确决定的原因包括:让亲属和子女采取预防措施;双方都需要了解癌症的遗传性并做好准备;需要能够与他人讨论情况。另一方面,一些患者认为分享信息不是一个好的决定,因为会产生焦虑:与亲属分享遗传性癌症致病基因变异检测结果的后悔程度往往较低。主要原因是患者认为他们能够通过分享信息使他人受益:医护人员需要了解患者分享后的看法和经历,并在整个分享过程中为他们提供支持。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Cancer Nursing
Cancer Nursing 医学-护理
CiteScore
4.80
自引率
3.80%
发文量
244
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Each bimonthly issue of Cancer Nursing™ addresses the whole spectrum of problems arising in the care and support of cancer patients--prevention and early detection, geriatric and pediatric cancer nursing, medical and surgical oncology, ambulatory care, nutritional support, psychosocial aspects of cancer, patient responses to all treatment modalities, and specific nursing interventions. The journal offers unparalleled coverage of cancer care delivery practices worldwide, as well as groundbreaking research findings and their practical applications.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信