Sergey Efetov, Albina Zubayraeva, Cüneyt Kayaalp, Alisa Minenkova, Yusuf Bağ, Aftandil Alekberzade, Petr Tsarkov
{"title":"Selective approach to arterial ligation in radical sigmoid colon cancer surgery with D3 lymph node dissection: A multicenter comparative study.","authors":"Sergey Efetov, Albina Zubayraeva, Cüneyt Kayaalp, Alisa Minenkova, Yusuf Bağ, Aftandil Alekberzade, Petr Tsarkov","doi":"10.47717/turkjsurg.2022.5867","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Radical surgery for sigmoid colon cancer is commonly performed with complete mesocolic excision (CME) and apical lymph node dissection, reached by central vascular ligation (CVL) of the inferior mesenteric artery (IMA) and associated extended left colon resection. However, IMA branches can be ligated selectively according to tumor location with D3 lymph node dissection (LND), economic segmental colon resection and tumorspecific mesocolon excision (TSME) if IMA is skeletonized. This study aimed to compare left hemicolectomy with CME and CVL and segmental colon resection with selective vascular ligation (SVL) and D3 LND.</p><p><strong>Material and methods: </strong>Patients (n= 217) treated with D3 LND for adenocarcinoma of the sigmoid colon between January 2013 and January 2020 were included in the study. The approach to vessel ligation, colon resection and mesocolon excision was based on tumor location in the study group, while in the comparison group, left hemicolectomy with routine CVL was performed. Survival rates were estimated as the primary endpoints of the study. Long- and short-term surgery-related outcomes were evaluated as the secondary endpoints of the study.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The studied approach to the IMA branch ligation was associated with a statistically significant decrease in intraoperative complication rates (2 vs 4, p= 0.024), operative procedure length (225.56 ± 80.356 vs 330.69 ± 175.488, p <0.001), and severe postoperative morbidity (6.2% vs 19.1%, p= 0.017). Meanwhile, the number of examined lymph nodes significantly increased (35.67 vs 26.69 per specimen, p <0.001). There were no statistically significant differences in survival rates.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Selective IMA branch ligation and TSME resulted in better intraoperative and postoperative outcomes with no difference in survival rates.</p>","PeriodicalId":23374,"journal":{"name":"Turkish Journal of Surgery","volume":"38 4","pages":"382-390"},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9979549/pdf/TJS-38-382.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Turkish Journal of Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.47717/turkjsurg.2022.5867","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Objectives: Radical surgery for sigmoid colon cancer is commonly performed with complete mesocolic excision (CME) and apical lymph node dissection, reached by central vascular ligation (CVL) of the inferior mesenteric artery (IMA) and associated extended left colon resection. However, IMA branches can be ligated selectively according to tumor location with D3 lymph node dissection (LND), economic segmental colon resection and tumorspecific mesocolon excision (TSME) if IMA is skeletonized. This study aimed to compare left hemicolectomy with CME and CVL and segmental colon resection with selective vascular ligation (SVL) and D3 LND.
Material and methods: Patients (n= 217) treated with D3 LND for adenocarcinoma of the sigmoid colon between January 2013 and January 2020 were included in the study. The approach to vessel ligation, colon resection and mesocolon excision was based on tumor location in the study group, while in the comparison group, left hemicolectomy with routine CVL was performed. Survival rates were estimated as the primary endpoints of the study. Long- and short-term surgery-related outcomes were evaluated as the secondary endpoints of the study.
Results: The studied approach to the IMA branch ligation was associated with a statistically significant decrease in intraoperative complication rates (2 vs 4, p= 0.024), operative procedure length (225.56 ± 80.356 vs 330.69 ± 175.488, p <0.001), and severe postoperative morbidity (6.2% vs 19.1%, p= 0.017). Meanwhile, the number of examined lymph nodes significantly increased (35.67 vs 26.69 per specimen, p <0.001). There were no statistically significant differences in survival rates.
Conclusion: Selective IMA branch ligation and TSME resulted in better intraoperative and postoperative outcomes with no difference in survival rates.
目的:乙状结肠根治性手术通常采用肠系膜下动脉(IMA)的中央血管结扎(CVL)和相关的左结肠延伸切除术,进行完整的肠系膜切除(CME)和根尖淋巴结清扫。然而,如果IMA骨化,可以根据肿瘤位置选择性结扎IMA分支,如D3淋巴结清扫术(LND)、经济节段性结肠切除术和肿瘤特异性肠系膜切除术(TSME)。本研究旨在比较CME和CVL的左半结肠切除术和选择性血管结扎(SVL)和D3 LND的部分结肠切除术。材料和方法:2013年1月至2020年1月期间接受乙状结肠腺癌D3 LND治疗的患者(n= 217)纳入研究。研究组根据肿瘤位置行血管结扎、结肠切除、结肠系膜切除入路,对照组行常规左半结肠切除术。生存率作为研究的主要终点。长期和短期手术相关结果作为研究的次要终点进行评估。结果:IMA分支结扎入路与术中并发症发生率(2 vs 4, p= 0.024)、手术时间(225.56±80.356 vs 330.69±175.488,p)相关,具有统计学意义。结论:选择性IMA分支结扎与TSME术中、术后效果较好,生存率无差异。