Speaker Responsibility for Synthetic Speech Derived from Neural Activity.

IF 1.3 3区哲学 Q3 ETHICS

Journal of Medicine and Philosophy Pub Date : 2022-11-05 DOI:10.1093/jmp/jhac011

Stephen Rainey

引用次数: 1

Abstract

This article provides analysis of the mechanisms and outputs involved in language-use mediated by a neuroprosthetic device. It is motivated by the thought that users of speech neuroprostheses require sufficient control over what their devices externalize as synthetic speech if they are to be thought of as responsible for it, but that the nature of this control, and so the status of their responsibility, is not clear.

查看原文本刊更多论文

神经活动衍生的合成语音的说话人责任。

本文分析了神经义肢装置介导语言使用的机制和输出。它的动机是这样一种想法，即语音神经假肢的使用者需要对他们的设备外化为合成语音的东西有足够的控制，如果他们被认为对它负责的话，但是这种控制的性质，以及他们责任的地位，并不清楚。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

求助全文

约1分钟内获得全文求助全文

来源期刊

Journal of Medicine and Philosophy Multiple-

CiteScore

2.90

自引率

6.20%

发文量

期刊介绍： This bimonthly publication explores the shared themes and concerns of philosophy and the medical sciences. Central issues in medical research and practice have important philosophical dimensions, for, in treating disease and promoting health, medicine involves presuppositions about human goals and values. Conversely, the concerns of philosophy often significantly relate to those of medicine, as philosophers seek to understand the nature of medical knowledge and the human condition in the modern world. In addition, recent developments in medical technology and treatment create moral problems that raise important philosophical questions. The Journal of Medicine and Philosophy aims to provide an ongoing forum for the discussion of such themes and issues.