An assessment of the laboratory network in Ghana: A national-level ATLAS survey (2019-2020).

IF 1 Q4 MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL
Emma E Kploanyi, Joseph Kenu, Benedicta K Atsu, David A Opare, Franklin Asiedu-Bekoe, Lee F Schroeder, David W Dowdy, Alfred E Yawson, Ernest Kenu
{"title":"An assessment of the laboratory network in Ghana: A national-level ATLAS survey (2019-2020).","authors":"Emma E Kploanyi,&nbsp;Joseph Kenu,&nbsp;Benedicta K Atsu,&nbsp;David A Opare,&nbsp;Franklin Asiedu-Bekoe,&nbsp;Lee F Schroeder,&nbsp;David W Dowdy,&nbsp;Alfred E Yawson,&nbsp;Ernest Kenu","doi":"10.4102/ajlm.v12i1.1844","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Integrated health systems with strong laboratory networks are critical in improving public health. The current study assessed the laboratory network in Ghana and its functionality using the Assessment Tool for Laboratory Services (ATLAS).</p><p><strong>Intervention: </strong>A national-level laboratory network survey was conducted among stakeholders of the Ghanaian laboratory network in Accra. Face-to-face interviews were conducted from December 2019 to January 2020, with follow-up phone interviews between June and July 2020. Also, we reviewed supporting documents provided by stakeholders for supplementary information and transcribed these to identify themes. Where possible, we completed the Laboratory Network scorecard using data obtained from the ATLAS.</p><p><strong>Lessons learnt: </strong>The Laboratory Network (LABNET) scorecard assessment was a valuable addition to the ATLAS survey as it quantified the functionality of the laboratory network and its overall advancement toward achieving International Health Regulations (2005) and Global Health Security Agenda targets. Two significant challenges indicated by respondents were laboratory financing and delayed implementation of the Ghana National Health Laboratory Policy.</p><p><strong>Recommendations: </strong>Stakeholders recommended a review of the country's funding landscape, such as funding laboratory services from the country's internally generated funds. Also, they recommended laboratory policy implementation to ensure adequate laboratory workforce and standards.</p>","PeriodicalId":45412,"journal":{"name":"African Journal of Laboratory Medicine","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9982496/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"African Journal of Laboratory Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4102/ajlm.v12i1.1844","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Integrated health systems with strong laboratory networks are critical in improving public health. The current study assessed the laboratory network in Ghana and its functionality using the Assessment Tool for Laboratory Services (ATLAS).

Intervention: A national-level laboratory network survey was conducted among stakeholders of the Ghanaian laboratory network in Accra. Face-to-face interviews were conducted from December 2019 to January 2020, with follow-up phone interviews between June and July 2020. Also, we reviewed supporting documents provided by stakeholders for supplementary information and transcribed these to identify themes. Where possible, we completed the Laboratory Network scorecard using data obtained from the ATLAS.

Lessons learnt: The Laboratory Network (LABNET) scorecard assessment was a valuable addition to the ATLAS survey as it quantified the functionality of the laboratory network and its overall advancement toward achieving International Health Regulations (2005) and Global Health Security Agenda targets. Two significant challenges indicated by respondents were laboratory financing and delayed implementation of the Ghana National Health Laboratory Policy.

Recommendations: Stakeholders recommended a review of the country's funding landscape, such as funding laboratory services from the country's internally generated funds. Also, they recommended laboratory policy implementation to ensure adequate laboratory workforce and standards.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

加纳实验室网络评估:一项国家级ATLAS调查(2019-2020)。
背景:具有强大实验室网络的综合卫生系统对改善公共卫生至关重要。目前的研究使用实验室服务评估工具(ATLAS)评估了加纳的实验室网络及其功能。干预措施:在阿克拉的加纳实验室网络的利益相关者中进行了国家级实验室网络调查。面对面访谈于2019年12月至2020年1月进行,后续电话访谈于2020年6月至7月进行。此外,我们审查了利益相关者提供的补充信息的支持文件,并将其转录以确定主题。在可能的情况下,我们使用ATLAS获得的数据完成了实验室网络记分卡。经验教训:实验室网络计分卡评估是ATLAS调查的宝贵补充,因为它量化了实验室网络的功能及其在实现《国际卫生条例(2005)》和全球卫生安全议程目标方面的总体进展。答复者指出的两项重大挑战是实验室资金筹措和加纳国家卫生实验室政策的延迟执行。建议:利益攸关方建议审查该国的供资情况,例如从该国内部产生的资金中资助实验室服务。此外,他们建议实施实验室政策,以确保足够的实验室工作人员和标准。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
African Journal of Laboratory Medicine
African Journal of Laboratory Medicine MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL-
CiteScore
1.70
自引率
9.10%
发文量
53
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊介绍: The African Journal of Laboratory Medicine, the official journal of ASLM, focuses on the role of the laboratory and its professionals in the clinical and public healthcare sectors,and is specifically based on an African frame of reference. Emphasis is on all aspects that promote and contribute to the laboratory medicine practices of Africa. This includes, amongst others: laboratories, biomedical scientists and clinicians, medical community, public health officials and policy makers, laboratory systems and policies (translation of laboratory knowledge, practices and technologies in clinical care), interfaces of laboratory with medical science, laboratory-based epidemiology, laboratory investigations, evidence-based effectiveness in real world (actual) settings.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信