Accuracy and economic evaluation of screening tests for undiagnosed COPD among hypertensive individuals in Brazil.

IF 3.1 3区 医学 Q1 PRIMARY HEALTH CARE
S M Martins, A P Dickens, W Salibe-Filho, A A Albuquerque Neto, P Adab, A Enocson, B G Cooper, L V A Sousa, A J Sitch, S Jowett, R Adams, K K Cheng, C Chi, J Correia-de-Sousa, A Farley, N Gale, K Jolly, M Maglakelidze, T Maghlakelidze, K Stavrikj, A M Turner, S Williams, R E Jordan, R Stelmach
{"title":"Accuracy and economic evaluation of screening tests for undiagnosed COPD among hypertensive individuals in Brazil.","authors":"S M Martins, A P Dickens, W Salibe-Filho, A A Albuquerque Neto, P Adab, A Enocson, B G Cooper, L V A Sousa, A J Sitch, S Jowett, R Adams, K K Cheng, C Chi, J Correia-de-Sousa, A Farley, N Gale, K Jolly, M Maglakelidze, T Maghlakelidze, K Stavrikj, A M Turner, S Williams, R E Jordan, R Stelmach","doi":"10.1038/s41533-022-00303-w","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>In Brazil, prevalence of diagnosed COPD among adults aged 40 years and over is 16% although over 70% of cases remain undiagnosed. Hypertension is common and well-recorded in primary care, and frequently co-exists with COPD because of common causes such as tobacco smoking, therefore we conducted a cross-sectional screening test accuracy study in nine Basic Health Units in Brazil, among hypertensive patients aged ≥40 years to identify the optimum screening test/combinations to detect undiagnosed COPD. We compared six index tests (four screening questionnaires, microspirometer and peak flow) against the reference test defined as those below the lower limit of normal (LLN-GLI) on quality diagnostic spirometry, with confirmed COPD at clinical review. Of 1162 participants, 6.8% (n = 79) had clinically confirmed COPD. Peak flow had a higher specificity but lower sensitivity than microspirometry (sensitivity 44.3% [95% CI 33.1, 55.9], specificity 95.5% [95% CI 94.1, 96.6]). SBQ performed well compared to the other questionnaires (sensitivity 75.9% [95% CI 65.0, 84.9], specificity 59.2% [95% CI 56.2, 62.1]). A strategy requiring both SBQ and peak flow to be positive yielded sensitivity of 39.2% (95% CI 28.4, 50.9) and specificity of 97.0% (95% CI 95.7, 97.9). The use of simple screening tests was feasible within the Brazilian primary care setting. The combination of SBQ and peak flow appeared most efficient, when considering performance of the test, cost and ease of use (costing £1690 (5554 R$) with 26.7 cases detected per 1,000 patients). However, the choice of screening tests depends on the clinical setting and availability of resources.ISRCTN registration number: 11377960.</p>","PeriodicalId":19470,"journal":{"name":"NPJ Primary Care Respiratory Medicine","volume":"32 1","pages":"55"},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9747958/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"NPJ Primary Care Respiratory Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1038/s41533-022-00303-w","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PRIMARY HEALTH CARE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In Brazil, prevalence of diagnosed COPD among adults aged 40 years and over is 16% although over 70% of cases remain undiagnosed. Hypertension is common and well-recorded in primary care, and frequently co-exists with COPD because of common causes such as tobacco smoking, therefore we conducted a cross-sectional screening test accuracy study in nine Basic Health Units in Brazil, among hypertensive patients aged ≥40 years to identify the optimum screening test/combinations to detect undiagnosed COPD. We compared six index tests (four screening questionnaires, microspirometer and peak flow) against the reference test defined as those below the lower limit of normal (LLN-GLI) on quality diagnostic spirometry, with confirmed COPD at clinical review. Of 1162 participants, 6.8% (n = 79) had clinically confirmed COPD. Peak flow had a higher specificity but lower sensitivity than microspirometry (sensitivity 44.3% [95% CI 33.1, 55.9], specificity 95.5% [95% CI 94.1, 96.6]). SBQ performed well compared to the other questionnaires (sensitivity 75.9% [95% CI 65.0, 84.9], specificity 59.2% [95% CI 56.2, 62.1]). A strategy requiring both SBQ and peak flow to be positive yielded sensitivity of 39.2% (95% CI 28.4, 50.9) and specificity of 97.0% (95% CI 95.7, 97.9). The use of simple screening tests was feasible within the Brazilian primary care setting. The combination of SBQ and peak flow appeared most efficient, when considering performance of the test, cost and ease of use (costing £1690 (5554 R$) with 26.7 cases detected per 1,000 patients). However, the choice of screening tests depends on the clinical setting and availability of resources.ISRCTN registration number: 11377960.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

巴西高血压患者未确诊慢性阻塞性肺病筛查试验的准确性和经济性评估。
在巴西,40 岁及以上成年人中确诊慢性阻塞性肺病的发病率为 16%,但仍有 70% 以上的病例未得到诊断。因此,我们在巴西的九个基层医疗单位对年龄≥40 岁的高血压患者进行了一项横断面筛查测试准确性研究,以确定检测未确诊慢性阻塞性肺病的最佳筛查测试/组合。我们将六项指标测试(四项筛查问卷、微呼气流量计和峰值流量)与参考测试进行了比较,参考测试的定义是在高质量诊断性肺活量测定中低于正常下限(LLN-GLI),并在临床复查中确诊为慢性阻塞性肺病的患者。在 1162 名参与者中,6.8%(n = 79)经临床确诊患有慢性阻塞性肺病。与微呼吸测定法相比,峰值流量的特异性更高,但敏感性更低(敏感性为 44.3% [95% CI 33.1, 55.9],特异性为 95.5% [95% CI 94.1, 96.6])。与其他问卷相比,SBQ 表现良好(灵敏度 75.9% [95% CI 65.0, 84.9],特异性 59.2% [95% CI 56.2, 62.1])。要求 SBQ 和峰值血流均为阳性的策略产生的敏感性为 39.2% (95% CI 28.4, 50.9),特异性为 97.0% (95% CI 95.7, 97.9)。在巴西的初级医疗机构中,使用简单的筛查测试是可行的。考虑到测试的性能、成本和易用性(成本为 1690 英镑(5554 雷亚尔),每 1000 名患者中检出 26.7 例),SBQ 和峰值流速的组合似乎最为有效。然而,筛查试验的选择取决于临床环境和可用资源。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
NPJ Primary Care Respiratory Medicine
NPJ Primary Care Respiratory Medicine PRIMARY HEALTH CARE-RESPIRATORY SYSTEM
CiteScore
5.50
自引率
6.50%
发文量
49
审稿时长
10 weeks
期刊介绍: npj Primary Care Respiratory Medicine is an open access, online-only, multidisciplinary journal dedicated to publishing high-quality research in all areas of the primary care management of respiratory and respiratory-related allergic diseases. Papers published by the journal represent important advances of significance to specialists within the fields of primary care and respiratory medicine. We are particularly interested in receiving papers in relation to the following aspects of respiratory medicine, respiratory-related allergic diseases and tobacco control: epidemiology prevention clinical care service delivery and organisation of healthcare (including implementation science) global health.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信