Preclinical Studies of the Nebulized Delivery of Liposomal Amphotericin B.

IF 2 4区 医学 Q3 RESPIRATORY SYSTEM
Sagar Kothari, Steven G Kefalos, Nicholas D Hages, Timothy E Corcoran, Shahid Husain
{"title":"Preclinical Studies of the Nebulized Delivery of Liposomal Amphotericin B.","authors":"Sagar Kothari,&nbsp;Steven G Kefalos,&nbsp;Nicholas D Hages,&nbsp;Timothy E Corcoran,&nbsp;Shahid Husain","doi":"10.1089/jamp.2022.0003","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b><i>Background:</i></b> Intravenous liposomal amphotericin B (L-AMB) has accompanying side effects that may be diminished when administering an inhaled form. Delivery systems for inhaled or aerosolized L-AMB vary, and there has not been a recent comparison of available systems to date. <b><i>Methods:</i></b> We compared three differently designed nebulizer delivery systems for the inhaled delivery of L-AMB to determine the best combination of efficient lung dosing and treatment time. Aerosol size was measured using a Malvern Mastersizer, and five separate nebulizers were tested. For drug output measurements, a Harvard Lung was used, and aerosol was collected using HEPA filters. <b><i>Results:</i></b> Overall aerosol size characteristics were similar for all devices with volume median diameters in the 4-5 μm range. The highest inhaled dose was delivered by the AeroEclipse. The Aerogen and the AeroEclipse had similar predicted pulmonary doses, and the AeroEclipse had the highest pulmonary delivery rates. <b><i>Conclusion:</i></b> The AeroEclipse nebulizer may provide more efficient delivery in a shorter amount of time; however, human studies are warranted to assess the safety, tolerability, and efficacy of inhaled delivery of L-AMB from this system.</p>","PeriodicalId":14940,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Aerosol Medicine and Pulmonary Drug Delivery","volume":"35 6","pages":"307-312"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Aerosol Medicine and Pulmonary Drug Delivery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1089/jamp.2022.0003","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"RESPIRATORY SYSTEM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Background: Intravenous liposomal amphotericin B (L-AMB) has accompanying side effects that may be diminished when administering an inhaled form. Delivery systems for inhaled or aerosolized L-AMB vary, and there has not been a recent comparison of available systems to date. Methods: We compared three differently designed nebulizer delivery systems for the inhaled delivery of L-AMB to determine the best combination of efficient lung dosing and treatment time. Aerosol size was measured using a Malvern Mastersizer, and five separate nebulizers were tested. For drug output measurements, a Harvard Lung was used, and aerosol was collected using HEPA filters. Results: Overall aerosol size characteristics were similar for all devices with volume median diameters in the 4-5 μm range. The highest inhaled dose was delivered by the AeroEclipse. The Aerogen and the AeroEclipse had similar predicted pulmonary doses, and the AeroEclipse had the highest pulmonary delivery rates. Conclusion: The AeroEclipse nebulizer may provide more efficient delivery in a shorter amount of time; however, human studies are warranted to assess the safety, tolerability, and efficacy of inhaled delivery of L-AMB from this system.

两性霉素B脂质体雾化递送的临床前研究。
背景:静脉注射两性霉素B脂质体(L-AMB)具有伴随的副作用,当给予吸入形式时可能会减少。吸入或雾化L-AMB的输送系统各不相同,迄今为止还没有对可用系统进行比较。方法:我们比较了三种不同设计的L-AMB吸入给药雾化器系统,以确定有效肺剂量和治疗时间的最佳组合。气溶胶的大小是用莫尔文浆料机测量的,并测试了五个独立的雾化器。对于药物输出测量,使用哈佛肺,气溶胶收集使用HEPA过滤器。结果:在体积中值直径在4-5 μm范围内的所有装置中,总体气溶胶尺寸特征相似。吸入剂量最高的是AeroEclipse。Aerogen和AeroEclipse具有相似的预测肺剂量,并且AeroEclipse具有最高的肺输送率。结论:AeroEclipse喷雾器可以在更短的时间内提供更有效的给药;然而,有必要进行人体研究,以评估从该系统吸入L-AMB的安全性、耐受性和有效性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.70
自引率
2.90%
发文量
34
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Journal of Aerosol Medicine and Pulmonary Drug Delivery is the only peer-reviewed journal delivering innovative, authoritative coverage of the health effects of inhaled aerosols and delivery of drugs through the pulmonary system. The Journal is a forum for leading experts, addressing novel topics such as aerosolized chemotherapy, aerosolized vaccines, methods to determine toxicities, and delivery of aerosolized drugs in the intubated patient. Journal of Aerosol Medicine and Pulmonary Drug Delivery coverage includes: Pulmonary drug delivery Airway reactivity and asthma treatment Inhalation of particles and gases in the respiratory tract Toxic effects of inhaled agents Aerosols as tools for studying basic physiologic phenomena.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信