Replies to the Critics of Knowing and Checking: an Epistemological Investigation

IF 0.3 3区文学 0 PHILOSOPHY

Acta Analytica-International Periodical for Philosophy in the Analytical Tradition Pub Date : 2023-01-04 DOI:10.1007/s12136-022-00541-0

Guido Melchior

引用次数: 1

Abstract

This paper replies to the comments made in Acta Analytica by Peter Baumann, Kelly Becker, Marian David, Nenad Miščević, Wes Siscoe, and Danilo Šuster on my Knowing and Checking: An Epistemological Investigation (Routledge 2019), hereinafter abbreviated as KC. These papers resulted from a workshop organized by the department of philosophy of the University of Maribor. I am very thankful to the organizers of the workshop and to the authors for their comments.

查看原文本刊更多论文

对“知道与检验”批判的回答:认识论的考察

本文回应了Peter Baumann、Kelly Becker、Marian David、Nenad Miščević、Wes Siscoe和Danilo Šuster在《Acta Analytica》上对我的Knowing and Checking: An Epistemological Investigation (Routledge 2019)(以下简称KC)发表的评论，这些论文来自马里博尔大学哲学系举办的研讨会。我非常感谢研讨会的组织者和作者的意见。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

求助全文

约1分钟内获得全文求助全文

来源期刊

Acta Analytica-International Periodical for Philosophy in the Analytical Tradition PHILOSOPHY-

CiteScore

1.20

自引率

0.00%

发文量

期刊介绍： Acta Analytica is an international journal for philosophy in the analytical tradition covering a variety of philosophical topics including philosophical logic, metaphysics, epistemology, philosophy of science and philosophy of mind. Special attention is devoted to cognitive science. The journal aims to promote a rigorous, argument-based approach in philosophy. Acta Analytica is a peer reviewed journal, published quarterly, with authors from all over the world.