In Vitro Comparison of MTA and BC RRM-Fast Set Putty as Retrograde Filling Materials.

IF 1.6 Q3 DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE
Carla Arvelaiz, Andreina Fernandes, Veronica Graterol, Katiuska Gomez, Jose Francisco Gomez-Sosa, Javier Caviedes-Bucheli, Carolina Guilarte
{"title":"In Vitro Comparison of MTA and BC RRM-Fast Set Putty as Retrograde Filling Materials.","authors":"Carla Arvelaiz,&nbsp;Andreina Fernandes,&nbsp;Veronica Graterol,&nbsp;Katiuska Gomez,&nbsp;Jose Francisco Gomez-Sosa,&nbsp;Javier Caviedes-Bucheli,&nbsp;Carolina Guilarte","doi":"10.14744/eej.2022.36036","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To compare, in vitro, the bioceramic materials (MTA and BC RRM-fast set putty) capacity to prevent microleakage of Enterococcus faecalis over time.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>An experimental design was made with forty extracted human teeth, coronally cut, and prepared to be placed in a leakage system under sterile conditions. They were randomly divided into two experimental groups: thirty teeth (fifteen for each of retrograde filling material MTA and BC RRM-fast set putty) and a control group: ten teeth (five positive control, five negative control). The 3 mm root-ends were submerged in a brain-heart infusion broth with a red phenol indicator. The coronal access of each sample was inoculated with E. faecalis every seven days to maintain bacterial viability. The lower chamber was evaluated daily for 30 days to observe the turbidity of the culture medium and establish the presence and day of the filtration. Calculation of the colony-forming units (CFU) was performed for each leaked sample. Fisher's Exact Test was used to verify the association between the presence or absence of leakage of the samples by type of bioceramic material used and the Mann-Whitney U test to verify the existence of a difference between the average of CFU by type of bioceramic material used. The significance level used was α=0.05 and a 95% confidence level, as a decision rule for rejecting the null hypothesis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of the total samples prepared for each group, leakage was found in 60.0% (9/15) of the MTA group and 40.0% (6/15) of the BC RRM-fast set putty group. All positive controls filtered on the first day of evaluation, while 20% (1/5) of the negative control leaked in the second week. There was no significant difference in leakege between the two groups, nor concerning the bacterial count (P=0.101) and the type of cement used (P=1.000).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>BC RRM-fast set putty was comparable to MTA in resisting bacterial microleakage during the observation time.</p>","PeriodicalId":11860,"journal":{"name":"European Endodontic Journal","volume":"7 3","pages":"203-209"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2022-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/83/ec/EEJ-7-203.PMC9608128.pdf","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Endodontic Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.14744/eej.2022.36036","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Objective: To compare, in vitro, the bioceramic materials (MTA and BC RRM-fast set putty) capacity to prevent microleakage of Enterococcus faecalis over time.

Methods: An experimental design was made with forty extracted human teeth, coronally cut, and prepared to be placed in a leakage system under sterile conditions. They were randomly divided into two experimental groups: thirty teeth (fifteen for each of retrograde filling material MTA and BC RRM-fast set putty) and a control group: ten teeth (five positive control, five negative control). The 3 mm root-ends were submerged in a brain-heart infusion broth with a red phenol indicator. The coronal access of each sample was inoculated with E. faecalis every seven days to maintain bacterial viability. The lower chamber was evaluated daily for 30 days to observe the turbidity of the culture medium and establish the presence and day of the filtration. Calculation of the colony-forming units (CFU) was performed for each leaked sample. Fisher's Exact Test was used to verify the association between the presence or absence of leakage of the samples by type of bioceramic material used and the Mann-Whitney U test to verify the existence of a difference between the average of CFU by type of bioceramic material used. The significance level used was α=0.05 and a 95% confidence level, as a decision rule for rejecting the null hypothesis.

Results: Of the total samples prepared for each group, leakage was found in 60.0% (9/15) of the MTA group and 40.0% (6/15) of the BC RRM-fast set putty group. All positive controls filtered on the first day of evaluation, while 20% (1/5) of the negative control leaked in the second week. There was no significant difference in leakege between the two groups, nor concerning the bacterial count (P=0.101) and the type of cement used (P=1.000).

Conclusion: BC RRM-fast set putty was comparable to MTA in resisting bacterial microleakage during the observation time.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

MTA与BC rrm -快凝腻子逆行充填材料的体外比较。
目的:比较生物陶瓷材料(MTA和BC - rmm -快凝腻子)在体外对粪肠球菌微渗漏的长期抑制作用。方法:取40颗拔除的人牙,冠状切齿,在无菌条件下放置于泄漏系统中,进行实验设计。随机分为两组:实验组30颗牙(MTA逆行充填材料和BC RRM-fast set腻子各15颗)和对照组10颗牙(阳性对照5颗,阴性对照5颗)。将3mm的根端浸泡在有红酚指示剂的脑心灌注肉汤中。每个样品的冠状通道每7天接种一次粪肠球菌,以保持细菌活力。每天对下腔进行评估,持续30天,观察培养基的浊度,确定过滤的存在和时间。计算每个泄漏样本的菌落形成单位(CFU)。使用Fisher精确检验来验证所使用的生物陶瓷材料类型的样品存在或不存在泄漏之间的关联,并使用Mann-Whitney U检验来验证所使用的生物陶瓷材料类型的CFU平均值之间存在差异。使用的显著性水平为α=0.05和95%置信水平,作为拒绝原假设的决策规则。结果:在各组制备的总样品中,MTA组渗漏率为60.0% (9/15),BC RRM-fast set腻子组渗漏率为40.0%(6/15)。阳性对照在评估第一天全部过滤,阴性对照20%(1/5)在第二周渗漏。两组间渗漏无显著差异,细菌数量(P=0.101)和使用的水泥类型(P=1.000)也无显著差异。结论:BC rrm快凝腻子在抗细菌微渗漏方面与MTA相当。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
European Endodontic Journal
European Endodontic Journal DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE-
CiteScore
3.40
自引率
5.60%
发文量
25
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信