Quantitative Assessment of Apically Extruded Debris after Single-Files Supplemental Retreatment considering Apical Patency Influence: In Vitro Study.

IF 3 Q3 MATERIALS SCIENCE, BIOMATERIALS
Neveen Ali Shaheen, Nahla Gamaleldin Elhelbawy, Dalia Abdelhamid Sherif
{"title":"Quantitative Assessment of Apically Extruded Debris after Single-Files Supplemental Retreatment considering Apical Patency Influence: <i>In Vitro Study</i>.","authors":"Neveen Ali Shaheen,&nbsp;Nahla Gamaleldin Elhelbawy,&nbsp;Dalia Abdelhamid Sherif","doi":"10.1155/2022/7544813","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study aims to assess the impact of re-establishing apical patency on the quantity of debris extruded through the apex after three supplementary retreatment files (TruNatomy (TRN), WaveOne Gold (WOG), and XP endo Finisher R (XPFR)).</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>Eighty single-rooted mandibular premolars were prepared with ProTaper Universal rotary systems (PTU) up to F3 and obturated. The samples were divided into two main groups according to the presence or absence of the apical patency (<i>n</i> = 40), GI with apical patency and GII without apical patency. Based on the file system, which was adopted to eliminate the previous filling, each group had four subgroups (<i>n</i> = 10). In GI PTUR and GII PTUR, ProTaper Universal retreatment files (PTUR) were utilized only to remove the most primary filling material (control groups). In the other groups (PTUR) used, it was first followed by supplementary files. The quantity of debris extruded by different retreatment file systems was determined and compared to the corresponding control group with or without apical patency. Data were analyzed using a two-way ANOVA with a post hoc Tukey's multiple comparison test at a 5% significance level.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>There was a statistically significant difference among the control and experimental groups. XPFR had the least quantity of extruded debris. Apical patency did not affect the debris extrusion.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>All tested files led to a significant apical debris extrusion regardless of apical patency.</p>","PeriodicalId":13704,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Biomaterials","volume":"2022 ","pages":"7544813"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9797296/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Biomaterials","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1155/2022/7544813","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"MATERIALS SCIENCE, BIOMATERIALS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: This study aims to assess the impact of re-establishing apical patency on the quantity of debris extruded through the apex after three supplementary retreatment files (TruNatomy (TRN), WaveOne Gold (WOG), and XP endo Finisher R (XPFR)).

Materials and methods: Eighty single-rooted mandibular premolars were prepared with ProTaper Universal rotary systems (PTU) up to F3 and obturated. The samples were divided into two main groups according to the presence or absence of the apical patency (n = 40), GI with apical patency and GII without apical patency. Based on the file system, which was adopted to eliminate the previous filling, each group had four subgroups (n = 10). In GI PTUR and GII PTUR, ProTaper Universal retreatment files (PTUR) were utilized only to remove the most primary filling material (control groups). In the other groups (PTUR) used, it was first followed by supplementary files. The quantity of debris extruded by different retreatment file systems was determined and compared to the corresponding control group with or without apical patency. Data were analyzed using a two-way ANOVA with a post hoc Tukey's multiple comparison test at a 5% significance level.

Results: There was a statistically significant difference among the control and experimental groups. XPFR had the least quantity of extruded debris. Apical patency did not affect the debris extrusion.

Conclusion: All tested files led to a significant apical debris extrusion regardless of apical patency.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

考虑根尖通畅影响的单锉补充再治疗后根尖挤压碎片的定量评估:体外研究。
目的:本研究旨在评估重建根尖通畅对三种辅助再治疗锉(TruNatomy (TRN), WaveOne Gold (WOG)和XP endo Finisher R (XPFR))后根尖突出碎片数量的影响。材料和方法:用ProTaper通用旋转系统(PTU)制备80颗单根下颌前磨牙,达到F3并封闭。根据有无根尖通畅将样本分为有根尖通畅的GI组和无根尖通畅的GI组(n = 40)。基于消除先前填充所采用的文件系统,每组分为4个子组(n = 10)。在GI PTUR和GII PTUR中,ProTaper通用再处理锉(PTUR)仅用于去除大部分初级填充材料(对照组)。在使用的其他组(PTUR)中,首先是补充文件。测定不同再处理文件系统挤出的碎片数量,并与相应的有或无根尖开放的对照组进行比较。数据分析采用双向方差分析和事后Tukey多重比较检验,显著性水平为5%。结果:对照组与实验组比较,差异有统计学意义。XPFR的挤压碎片数量最少。根尖通畅不影响碎片挤压。结论:无论根尖是否通畅,所有测试的锉都导致了明显的根尖碎片挤压。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
International Journal of Biomaterials
International Journal of Biomaterials MATERIALS SCIENCE, BIOMATERIALS-
CiteScore
4.30
自引率
3.20%
发文量
50
审稿时长
21 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信