Association of Admission Time and Mortality in STEMI Patients: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

IF 0.5 Q4 PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE
International Journal of Angiology Pub Date : 2022-03-03 eCollection Date: 2022-12-01 DOI:10.1055/s-0042-1742610
Surya Dharma, William Kamarullah, Adelia Putri Sabrina
{"title":"Association of Admission Time and Mortality in STEMI Patients: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.","authors":"Surya Dharma, William Kamarullah, Adelia Putri Sabrina","doi":"10.1055/s-0042-1742610","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to evaluate patients with acute ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) who were admitted during off-hours and treated with primary angioplasty associated with an increased risk of mortality compared with those admitted during regular working hours. We performed a systematic literature search using PubMed, SCOPUS, Europe PMC, and Cochrane CENTRAL databases that was finalized on March 15, 2021. The primary outcome was mortality comprising early (in-hospital), midterm (30 days to 1 year), and long-term mortality (>1 year). A total of 384,452 patients from 56 studies were included. The overall mortality of acute STEMI patients admitted during off-hours and regular hours were 6.1 and 6.7%, respectively. Patients admitted during off-hours had similar risk of early, midterm, and long-term mortality compared to those admitted during regular working hours ([relative risk or RR = 1.07, 95% confidence interval or CI, 1.00-1.14, <i>p</i>  = 0.06; <i>I</i> <sup>2</sup>  = 45%, <i>p</i>  = 0.0009], [RR = 1.00, 95% CI, 0.95-1.05, <i>p</i>  = 0.92; <i>I</i> <sup>2</sup>  = 13%, <i>p</i>  = 0.26], and [RR = 0.95, 95% CI, 0.86-1.04, <i>p</i>  = 0.26; <i>I</i> <sup>2</sup>  = 0%, <i>p</i>  = 0.76], respectively). Subgroup analyses indicated that the results were consistent across all subgroups ([women vs. men], [age >65 years vs. ≤65 years], and [Killip classification II to IV vs. Killip I]). Funnel plot was asymmetrical. However, Egger's test suggests no significance of small-study effects ( <i>p</i>  = 0.19). This meta-analysis showed that patients with acute STEMI who were admitted during off-hours and treated with primary angioplasty had similar risk of early, midterm, and long-term mortality compared with those admitted during regular working hours.</p>","PeriodicalId":13798,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Angiology","volume":"31 4","pages":"273-283"},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2022-03-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9803553/pdf/10-1055-s-0042-1742610.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Angiology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0042-1742610","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2022/12/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to evaluate patients with acute ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) who were admitted during off-hours and treated with primary angioplasty associated with an increased risk of mortality compared with those admitted during regular working hours. We performed a systematic literature search using PubMed, SCOPUS, Europe PMC, and Cochrane CENTRAL databases that was finalized on March 15, 2021. The primary outcome was mortality comprising early (in-hospital), midterm (30 days to 1 year), and long-term mortality (>1 year). A total of 384,452 patients from 56 studies were included. The overall mortality of acute STEMI patients admitted during off-hours and regular hours were 6.1 and 6.7%, respectively. Patients admitted during off-hours had similar risk of early, midterm, and long-term mortality compared to those admitted during regular working hours ([relative risk or RR = 1.07, 95% confidence interval or CI, 1.00-1.14, p  = 0.06; I 2  = 45%, p  = 0.0009], [RR = 1.00, 95% CI, 0.95-1.05, p  = 0.92; I 2  = 13%, p  = 0.26], and [RR = 0.95, 95% CI, 0.86-1.04, p  = 0.26; I 2  = 0%, p  = 0.76], respectively). Subgroup analyses indicated that the results were consistent across all subgroups ([women vs. men], [age >65 years vs. ≤65 years], and [Killip classification II to IV vs. Killip I]). Funnel plot was asymmetrical. However, Egger's test suggests no significance of small-study effects ( p  = 0.19). This meta-analysis showed that patients with acute STEMI who were admitted during off-hours and treated with primary angioplasty had similar risk of early, midterm, and long-term mortality compared with those admitted during regular working hours.

STEMI 患者入院时间与死亡率的关系:系统回顾与元分析》。
这项系统性综述和荟萃分析旨在评估急性 ST 段抬高型心肌梗死(STEMI)患者在非工作时间入院并接受初级血管成形术治疗与正常工作时间入院的患者相比死亡率风险增加的相关性。我们使用 PubMed、SCOPUS、Europe PMC 和 Cochrane CENTRAL 数据库进行了系统性文献检索,该检索于 2021 年 3 月 15 日完成。主要结果是死亡率,包括早期死亡率(院内)、中期死亡率(30 天至 1 年)和长期死亡率(>1 年)。共纳入了 56 项研究的 384,452 名患者。非工作时间和正常工作时间入院的急性 STEMI 患者的总死亡率分别为 6.1% 和 6.7%。与正常工作时间收治的患者相比,非工作时间收治的患者的早期、中期和长期死亡风险相似([相对风险或 RR = 1.07,95% 置信区间或 CI,1.00-1.14,p = 0.06;I 2 = 45%,p = 0.0009]、[RR = 1.00,95% CI,0.95-1.05,p = 0.92;I 2 = 13%,p = 0.26]和[RR = 0.95,95% CI,0.86-1.04,p = 0.26;I 2 = 0%,p = 0.76])。分组分析表明,所有分组([女性 vs. 男性]、[年龄大于 65 岁 vs. 小于 65 岁]和[Killip 分级 II 至 IV vs. Killip 分级 I])的结果一致。漏斗图不对称。然而,Egger 检验表明小研究效应不显著(P = 0.19)。这项荟萃分析表明,与正常工作时间入院的急性 STEMI 患者相比,非工作时间入院并接受初级血管成形术治疗的急性 STEMI 患者的早期、中期和长期死亡风险相似。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
International Journal of Angiology
International Journal of Angiology PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE-
CiteScore
1.30
自引率
16.70%
发文量
57
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信