Collaborative design and implementation of a clinical decision support system for automated fall-risk identification and referrals in emergency departments

IF 2 4区 医学 Q3 HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES
Gwen Costa Jacobsohn PhD MA , Margaret Leaf MS , Frank Liao PhD , Apoorva P. Maru BS , Collin J. Engstrom PhD MS , Megan E. Salwei PhD , Gerald T. Pankratz MD , Alexis Eastman MD , Pascale Carayon PhD , Douglas A. Wiegmann PhD MS , Joel S. Galang MS , Maureen A. Smith MD PhD MPH , Manish N. Shah MD MPH , Brian W. Patterson MD MPH
{"title":"Collaborative design and implementation of a clinical decision support system for automated fall-risk identification and referrals in emergency departments","authors":"Gwen Costa Jacobsohn PhD MA ,&nbsp;Margaret Leaf MS ,&nbsp;Frank Liao PhD ,&nbsp;Apoorva P. Maru BS ,&nbsp;Collin J. Engstrom PhD MS ,&nbsp;Megan E. Salwei PhD ,&nbsp;Gerald T. Pankratz MD ,&nbsp;Alexis Eastman MD ,&nbsp;Pascale Carayon PhD ,&nbsp;Douglas A. Wiegmann PhD MS ,&nbsp;Joel S. Galang MS ,&nbsp;Maureen A. Smith MD PhD MPH ,&nbsp;Manish N. Shah MD MPH ,&nbsp;Brian W. Patterson MD MPH","doi":"10.1016/j.hjdsi.2021.100598","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Of the 3 million older adults seeking fall-related emergency care each year, nearly one-third visited the Emergency Department<span> (ED) in the previous 6 months. ED providers have a great opportunity to refer patients for fall prevention services at these initial visits, but lack feasible tools for identifying those at highest-risk. Existing fall screening tools have been poorly adopted due to ED staff/provider burden and lack of workflow integration. To address this, we developed an automated clinical decision support (CDS) system for identifying and referring older adult ED patients at risk of future falls.</span></p><p>We engaged an interdisciplinary design team (ED providers, health services researchers, information technology/predictive analytics professionals, and outpatient Falls Clinic staff) to collaboratively develop a system that successfully met user requirements and integrated seamlessly into existing ED workflows. Our rapid-cycle development and evaluation process employed a novel combination of human-centered design, implementation science, and patient experience strategies, facilitating simultaneous design of the CDS<span> tool and intervention implementation strategies. This included defining system requirements, systematically identifying and resolving usability problems, assessing barriers and facilitators to implementation (e.g., data accessibility, lack of time, high patient volumes, appointment availability) from multiple vantage points, and refining protocols for communicating with referred patients at discharge. ED physician, nurse, and patient stakeholders were also engaged through online surveys and user testing.</span></p><p>Successful CDS design and implementation required integration of multiple new technologies and processes into existing workflows, necessitating interdisciplinary collaboration from the onset. By using this iterative approach, we were able to design and implement an intervention meeting all project goals. Processes used in this Clinical-IT-Research partnership can be applied to other use cases involving automated risk-stratification, CDS development, and EHR-facilitated care coordination.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":29963,"journal":{"name":"Healthcare-The Journal of Delivery Science and Innovation","volume":"10 1","pages":"Article 100598"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Healthcare-The Journal of Delivery Science and Innovation","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2213076421000816","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

Abstract

Of the 3 million older adults seeking fall-related emergency care each year, nearly one-third visited the Emergency Department (ED) in the previous 6 months. ED providers have a great opportunity to refer patients for fall prevention services at these initial visits, but lack feasible tools for identifying those at highest-risk. Existing fall screening tools have been poorly adopted due to ED staff/provider burden and lack of workflow integration. To address this, we developed an automated clinical decision support (CDS) system for identifying and referring older adult ED patients at risk of future falls.

We engaged an interdisciplinary design team (ED providers, health services researchers, information technology/predictive analytics professionals, and outpatient Falls Clinic staff) to collaboratively develop a system that successfully met user requirements and integrated seamlessly into existing ED workflows. Our rapid-cycle development and evaluation process employed a novel combination of human-centered design, implementation science, and patient experience strategies, facilitating simultaneous design of the CDS tool and intervention implementation strategies. This included defining system requirements, systematically identifying and resolving usability problems, assessing barriers and facilitators to implementation (e.g., data accessibility, lack of time, high patient volumes, appointment availability) from multiple vantage points, and refining protocols for communicating with referred patients at discharge. ED physician, nurse, and patient stakeholders were also engaged through online surveys and user testing.

Successful CDS design and implementation required integration of multiple new technologies and processes into existing workflows, necessitating interdisciplinary collaboration from the onset. By using this iterative approach, we were able to design and implement an intervention meeting all project goals. Processes used in this Clinical-IT-Research partnership can be applied to other use cases involving automated risk-stratification, CDS development, and EHR-facilitated care coordination.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

一个临床决策支持系统的协同设计和实施,用于自动跌倒风险识别和急诊科转诊
在每年寻求跌倒相关急诊护理的300万老年人中,近三分之一的人在过去6个月内访问了急诊科(ED)。在初次就诊时,急诊科医生有很大的机会向患者推荐预防跌倒的服务,但缺乏可行的工具来识别那些风险最高的患者。由于急诊科工作人员/提供者的负担和缺乏工作流集成,现有的秋季筛查工具没有得到很好的采用。为了解决这个问题,我们开发了一个自动临床决策支持(CDS)系统,用于识别和转诊有未来跌倒风险的老年ED患者。我们聘请了一个跨学科的设计团队(ED提供者、卫生服务研究人员、信息技术/预测分析专业人员和门诊Falls诊所的工作人员)共同开发一个成功满足用户需求并无缝集成到现有ED工作流程的系统。我们的快速循环开发和评估过程采用了以人为本的设计、实施科学和患者体验策略的新颖组合,促进了CDS工具和干预实施策略的同步设计。这包括定义系统需求,系统地识别和解决可用性问题,从多个有利位置评估实施的障碍和促进因素(例如,数据可访问性,缺乏时间,高患者量,预约可用性),以及完善出院时与转诊患者沟通的协议。通过在线调查和用户测试,急诊科医生、护士和患者利益相关者也参与其中。成功的CDS设计和实施需要将多种新技术和流程集成到现有的工作流程中,从一开始就需要跨学科的协作。通过使用这种迭代方法,我们能够设计和实现满足所有项目目标的干预。这种临床-信息技术-研究伙伴关系中使用的流程可以应用于涉及自动化风险分层、CDS开发和ehr促进的护理协调的其他用例。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
37
期刊介绍: HealthCare: The Journal of Delivery Science and Innovation is a quarterly journal. The journal promotes cutting edge research on innovation in healthcare delivery, including improvements in systems, processes, management, and applied information technology. The journal welcomes submissions of original research articles, case studies capturing "policy to practice" or "implementation of best practices", commentaries, and critical reviews of relevant novel programs and products. The scope of the journal includes topics directly related to delivering healthcare, such as: ● Care redesign ● Applied health IT ● Payment innovation ● Managerial innovation ● Quality improvement (QI) research ● New training and education models ● Comparative delivery innovation
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信