The clinical efficacy and safety of TACE combined with apatinib for advanced hepatocellular carcinoma: A propensity score matching analysis.

IF 0.9 4区 医学 Q4 ONCOLOGY
Indian journal of cancer Pub Date : 2024-04-01 Epub Date: 2022-11-30 DOI:10.4103/ijc.IJC_967_20
Cheng Chen, Xiaoting Duan, Yanfeng Shen, Guiying Li
{"title":"The clinical efficacy and safety of TACE combined with apatinib for advanced hepatocellular carcinoma: A propensity score matching analysis.","authors":"Cheng Chen, Xiaoting Duan, Yanfeng Shen, Guiying Li","doi":"10.4103/ijc.IJC_967_20","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The combined treatment of transcatheter arterial chemoembolization (TACE) and apatinib had beneficial effects on the survival of patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), but the efficacy of this regimen is still controversial and needs further investigation.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>The clinical records of advanced HCC patients between May 2015 and December 2016 were collected from our hospital. They were categorized into the TACE monotherapy group and the combination of TACE and apatinib group. After propensity score matching (PSM) analysis, the disease control rate (DCR), objective response rate (ORR), progression-free survival (PFS), and occurrence of adverse events were compared between the two treatments.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>There were 115 HCC patients included in the study. Among them, 53 received TACE monotherapy and 62 were treated with TACE plus apatinib. After PSM analysis, 50 pairs of patients were compared. The DCR of the TACE group was significantly lower than that of the combination of TACE and apatinib group (35 [70%] versus 45 [90%], P < 0.05). The ORR of the TACE group was also significantly lower than that of the combination of TACE and apatinib group (22 [44%] versus 34 [68%], P < 0.05). Patients who received the combined treatment of TACE and apatinib had longer PFS compared with those in the TACE monotherapy group ( P < 0.001). Moreover, hypertension, hand-foot syndrome, and albuminuria were more common in the combination of TACE and apatinib group ( P < 0.05), although all adverse events were well tolerated.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The combined treatment of TACE and apatinib showed beneficial effects on tumor response, survival outcomes, and tolerance to treatment, which may be used as a routine regimen for advanced HCC patients.</p>","PeriodicalId":13505,"journal":{"name":"Indian journal of cancer","volume":" ","pages":"390-395"},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Indian journal of cancer","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/ijc.IJC_967_20","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2022/11/30 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The combined treatment of transcatheter arterial chemoembolization (TACE) and apatinib had beneficial effects on the survival of patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), but the efficacy of this regimen is still controversial and needs further investigation.

Materials and methods: The clinical records of advanced HCC patients between May 2015 and December 2016 were collected from our hospital. They were categorized into the TACE monotherapy group and the combination of TACE and apatinib group. After propensity score matching (PSM) analysis, the disease control rate (DCR), objective response rate (ORR), progression-free survival (PFS), and occurrence of adverse events were compared between the two treatments.

Results: There were 115 HCC patients included in the study. Among them, 53 received TACE monotherapy and 62 were treated with TACE plus apatinib. After PSM analysis, 50 pairs of patients were compared. The DCR of the TACE group was significantly lower than that of the combination of TACE and apatinib group (35 [70%] versus 45 [90%], P < 0.05). The ORR of the TACE group was also significantly lower than that of the combination of TACE and apatinib group (22 [44%] versus 34 [68%], P < 0.05). Patients who received the combined treatment of TACE and apatinib had longer PFS compared with those in the TACE monotherapy group ( P < 0.001). Moreover, hypertension, hand-foot syndrome, and albuminuria were more common in the combination of TACE and apatinib group ( P < 0.05), although all adverse events were well tolerated.

Conclusions: The combined treatment of TACE and apatinib showed beneficial effects on tumor response, survival outcomes, and tolerance to treatment, which may be used as a routine regimen for advanced HCC patients.

TACE联合阿帕替尼治疗晚期肝细胞癌的临床疗效和安全性:倾向评分匹配分析。
背景:经导管动脉化疗栓塞术(TACE)与阿帕替尼联合治疗对晚期肝细胞癌(HCC)患者的生存有良好的影响,但该方案的疗效仍存在争议,有待进一步研究:收集我院2015年5月至2016年12月期间晚期HCC患者的临床病历。他们被分为 TACE 单药治疗组和 TACE 与阿帕替尼联合治疗组。经过倾向得分匹配(PSM)分析,比较了两种治疗方法的疾病控制率(DCR)、客观反应率(ORR)、无进展生存期(PFS)和不良事件发生率:研究共纳入115例HCC患者。结果:研究共纳入115例HCC患者,其中53例接受TACE单药治疗,62例接受TACE联合阿帕替尼治疗。经过PSM分析,50对患者进行了比较。TACE组的DCR明显低于TACE和阿帕替尼联合组(35[70%]对45[90%],P<0.05)。TACE组的ORR也明显低于TACE和阿帕替尼联合治疗组(22 [44%] 对 34 [68%],P < 0.05)。与 TACE 单药组相比,接受 TACE 和阿帕替尼联合治疗的患者的 PFS 更长(P < 0.001)。此外,高血压、手足综合征和白蛋白尿在TACE和阿帕替尼联合治疗组中更为常见(P<0.05),尽管所有不良反应均可耐受:结论:TACE和阿帕替尼联合治疗对肿瘤反应、生存结果和治疗耐受性均有益处,可作为晚期HCC患者的常规治疗方案。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Indian journal of cancer
Indian journal of cancer Medicine-Oncology
CiteScore
1.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
67
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Indian Journal of Cancer (ISSN 0019-509X), the show window of the progress of ontological sciences in India, was established in 1963. Indian Journal of Cancer is the first and only periodical serving the needs of all the specialties of oncology in India.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信