Associations of Alpha and Beta Interhemispheric EEG Coherences with Indices of Attentional Control and Academic Performance.

IF 2.7 4区 医学 Q2 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Behavioural Neurology Pub Date : 2020-02-05 eCollection Date: 2020-01-01 DOI:10.1155/2020/4672340
Vasavi R Gorantla, Sarah Tedesco, Merin Chandanathil, Sabyasachi Maity, Vernon Bond, Courtney Lewis, Richard M Millis
{"title":"Associations of Alpha and Beta Interhemispheric EEG Coherences with Indices of Attentional Control and Academic Performance.","authors":"Vasavi R Gorantla, Sarah Tedesco, Merin Chandanathil, Sabyasachi Maity, Vernon Bond, Courtney Lewis, Richard M Millis","doi":"10.1155/2020/4672340","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><i>Introduction</i>. Heretofore, research on optimizing academic performance has suffered from an inability to translate what is known about an individual's learning behaviors to how effectively they are able to use the critical nodes and hubs in their cerebral cortex for learning. A previous study from our laboratory suggests that lower theta-beta ratios (TBRs) measured by EEG may be associated with higher academic performance in a medical school curriculum.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In this study, we tested the hypothesis that TBR and academic performance may be correlated with EEG coherence, a measure of brain connectivity. We analyzed the interhemispheric coherences of the subjects involved in our prior study. TBR and coherence measurements were made at 19 scalp electrode recording sites and 171 electrode combinations with eyes open and closed (EO, EC). Control data were acquired during a session of acclimation to the research protocol 3 d before an initial examination in anatomy-physiology (control exam) and were repeated five weeks later, 3 d before a second exam covering different anatomy-physiology topics (comparison exam).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Between the control and comparison exams, beta coherences increased significantly at the frontal pole, frontal, parietal, midtemporal, posterior temporal, and occipital recording sites under the EO condition and at the inferior frontal, central, midtemporal, and posterior temporal sites under the EC condition. Alpha coherences increased significantly at the same sites and under the same EO/EC conditions as found for the beta coherences. The beta coherences were negatively correlated with the TBR and were positively correlated with the comparison exam score at the midfrontal electrode site (F3-F4) but only under the EO condition. Beta and alpha coherences at the midfrontal, inferior frontal midtemporal, posterior temporal, and occipital sites were also negatively correlated with the average TBR under the EO condition.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Lower TBR, an indicator of attentional control, was associated with higher alpha and beta interhemispheric coherences measured with eyes open at sites overlying the frontal, temporal, and occipital cortices. Changes in EEG coherences and TBRs might be useful as neurophysiological measures of neuroplasticity and the efficacy of strategies for preventing academic underachievement and treatments for improving academic performance.</p>","PeriodicalId":50733,"journal":{"name":"Behavioural Neurology","volume":"2020 ","pages":"4672340"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2020-02-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1155/2020/4672340","citationCount":"7","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Behavioural Neurology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1155/2020/4672340","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2020/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 7

Abstract

Introduction. Heretofore, research on optimizing academic performance has suffered from an inability to translate what is known about an individual's learning behaviors to how effectively they are able to use the critical nodes and hubs in their cerebral cortex for learning. A previous study from our laboratory suggests that lower theta-beta ratios (TBRs) measured by EEG may be associated with higher academic performance in a medical school curriculum.

Methods: In this study, we tested the hypothesis that TBR and academic performance may be correlated with EEG coherence, a measure of brain connectivity. We analyzed the interhemispheric coherences of the subjects involved in our prior study. TBR and coherence measurements were made at 19 scalp electrode recording sites and 171 electrode combinations with eyes open and closed (EO, EC). Control data were acquired during a session of acclimation to the research protocol 3 d before an initial examination in anatomy-physiology (control exam) and were repeated five weeks later, 3 d before a second exam covering different anatomy-physiology topics (comparison exam).

Results: Between the control and comparison exams, beta coherences increased significantly at the frontal pole, frontal, parietal, midtemporal, posterior temporal, and occipital recording sites under the EO condition and at the inferior frontal, central, midtemporal, and posterior temporal sites under the EC condition. Alpha coherences increased significantly at the same sites and under the same EO/EC conditions as found for the beta coherences. The beta coherences were negatively correlated with the TBR and were positively correlated with the comparison exam score at the midfrontal electrode site (F3-F4) but only under the EO condition. Beta and alpha coherences at the midfrontal, inferior frontal midtemporal, posterior temporal, and occipital sites were also negatively correlated with the average TBR under the EO condition.

Conclusions: Lower TBR, an indicator of attentional control, was associated with higher alpha and beta interhemispheric coherences measured with eyes open at sites overlying the frontal, temporal, and occipital cortices. Changes in EEG coherences and TBRs might be useful as neurophysiological measures of neuroplasticity and the efficacy of strategies for preventing academic underachievement and treatments for improving academic performance.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

α和β脑电信号与注意控制和学习成绩指标的关联。
介绍。到目前为止,关于优化学习成绩的研究一直无法将个人学习行为的已知信息转化为他们如何有效地利用大脑皮层中的关键节点和枢纽进行学习。我们实验室之前的一项研究表明,脑电图测量的较低的theta-beta比率(TBRs)可能与医学院课程中较高的学习成绩有关。方法:在本研究中,我们验证了TBR和学习成绩可能与脑电图一致性(一种衡量大脑连通性的方法)相关的假设。我们分析了先前研究中受试者的大脑半球一致性。在19个头皮电极记录点和171个睁眼和闭眼电极组合(EO, EC)进行TBR和相干性测量。对照数据在解剖生理学初步检查(对照检查)前3天在研究方案的适应过程中获得,并在5周后的第二次检查(对比检查)前3天重复进行。结果:在对照和比较测试之间,在EO条件下,额极、额、顶叶、颞中部、颞后部和枕部记录部位的β相干性显著增加;在EC条件下,额下、中央、颞中部和颞后部记录部位的β相干性显著增加。在相同的EO/EC条件下,α相干性与β相干性在相同的位点上显著增加。β相干性与TBR呈负相关,与额叶正中电极位置(F3-F4)的比较考试分数呈正相关,但仅在EO条件下。在EO条件下,额中、额下、颞中、颞后和枕部的β和α一致性也与平均TBR呈负相关。结论:较低的TBR(注意控制的一个指标)与较高的α和β半球间一致性有关,这些一致性是通过睁眼在额叶、颞叶和枕叶皮层上测量的。脑电一致性和脑动电位的变化可能作为神经可塑性的神经生理学指标,以及预防学习成绩不佳策略和提高学习成绩治疗的有效性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Behavioural Neurology
Behavioural Neurology 医学-临床神经学
CiteScore
5.40
自引率
3.60%
发文量
52
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Behavioural Neurology is a peer-reviewed, Open Access journal which publishes original research articles, review articles and clinical studies based on various diseases and syndromes in behavioural neurology. The aim of the journal is to provide a platform for researchers and clinicians working in various fields of neurology including cognitive neuroscience, neuropsychology and neuropsychiatry. Topics of interest include: ADHD Aphasia Autism Alzheimer’s Disease Behavioural Disorders Dementia Epilepsy Multiple Sclerosis Parkinson’s Disease Psychosis Stroke Traumatic brain injury.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信