Outcome of Primary Mediastinal Large B Cell Lymphoma Treated with RCHOP.

IF 2.1 Q3 HEMATOLOGY
Khalid Halahleh, Abeer Yaseen, Isra Muradi, Akram Al-Ibraheem, Iyad Sultan, Mohammad Ma'koseh
{"title":"Outcome of Primary Mediastinal Large B Cell Lymphoma Treated with RCHOP.","authors":"Khalid Halahleh,&nbsp;Abeer Yaseen,&nbsp;Isra Muradi,&nbsp;Akram Al-Ibraheem,&nbsp;Iyad Sultan,&nbsp;Mohammad Ma'koseh","doi":"10.2147/JBM.S393180","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Primary mediastinal large B-cell Lymphoma (PMLBCL) is a rare aggressive lymphoma with unique clinical, pathological, and molecular features. The optimal frontline therapy is subject of ongoing debate. Our study aims to evaluate the outcomes of PMLBCL treated with rituximab, cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine, and prednisone (RCHOP) at King Hussein Cancer Center.</p><p><strong>Patients and methods: </strong>Adult patients >18 years of age with PMLBCL treated with RCHOP from January 2011 to July 2020 were identified. All demographics, disease and treatment related variables were retrospectively collected. Correlations of clinical and laboratory variables with progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were determined by univariate and multivariate analyses using backward stepwise Cox regression models. The PFS and OS were plotted using Kaplan‒Meier curves.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>49 patients were included with a median age of 29 years. 14 (28.6%) had stage III or IV, 31 (63.3%) had mediastinal bulky disease. International prognostic index (IPI) was 0-1 in 35 (71.4%). Radiotherapy was given to 32 (65.3%) patients. End of treatment (EOT) response was complete (CR) in 32 (65.3%), partial response (PR) in 8 (16.3%) and progressive disease (PD) in 9 (18.4%). Patients who achieved CR at EOT, compared favorably with those who did not in regard to 4-year OS (92.5% vs 26.9%, p=<0.001). Overall objective response to salvage chemotherapies was 26.7%. At a median follow-up of 46 months, 4-year PFS and OS were 60% and 71% respectively. In multivariate analysis, IPI > one correlated with the EOT response (p=0.009), PFS (p=0.004) and OS (p= 0.019).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>In PMLBCL, RCHOP chemotherapy backbone in the frontline therapy is suboptimal but can be used in patients with low IPI. Adapting more intensive chemoimmunotherapy regimens may be considered for patients with high IPI. Salvage chemotherapy has limited activity in patients with relapsed or refractory disease.</p>","PeriodicalId":15166,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Blood Medicine","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/3d/18/jbm-14-147.PMC9952517.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Blood Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2147/JBM.S393180","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"HEMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: Primary mediastinal large B-cell Lymphoma (PMLBCL) is a rare aggressive lymphoma with unique clinical, pathological, and molecular features. The optimal frontline therapy is subject of ongoing debate. Our study aims to evaluate the outcomes of PMLBCL treated with rituximab, cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine, and prednisone (RCHOP) at King Hussein Cancer Center.

Patients and methods: Adult patients >18 years of age with PMLBCL treated with RCHOP from January 2011 to July 2020 were identified. All demographics, disease and treatment related variables were retrospectively collected. Correlations of clinical and laboratory variables with progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were determined by univariate and multivariate analyses using backward stepwise Cox regression models. The PFS and OS were plotted using Kaplan‒Meier curves.

Results: 49 patients were included with a median age of 29 years. 14 (28.6%) had stage III or IV, 31 (63.3%) had mediastinal bulky disease. International prognostic index (IPI) was 0-1 in 35 (71.4%). Radiotherapy was given to 32 (65.3%) patients. End of treatment (EOT) response was complete (CR) in 32 (65.3%), partial response (PR) in 8 (16.3%) and progressive disease (PD) in 9 (18.4%). Patients who achieved CR at EOT, compared favorably with those who did not in regard to 4-year OS (92.5% vs 26.9%, p=<0.001). Overall objective response to salvage chemotherapies was 26.7%. At a median follow-up of 46 months, 4-year PFS and OS were 60% and 71% respectively. In multivariate analysis, IPI > one correlated with the EOT response (p=0.009), PFS (p=0.004) and OS (p= 0.019).

Conclusion: In PMLBCL, RCHOP chemotherapy backbone in the frontline therapy is suboptimal but can be used in patients with low IPI. Adapting more intensive chemoimmunotherapy regimens may be considered for patients with high IPI. Salvage chemotherapy has limited activity in patients with relapsed or refractory disease.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

RCHOP治疗原发性纵隔大B细胞淋巴瘤的疗效。
目的:原发性纵隔大b细胞淋巴瘤(PMLBCL)是一种罕见的侵袭性淋巴瘤,具有独特的临床、病理和分子特征。最佳的一线治疗 是持续争论的主题。本研究旨在评估侯赛因国王癌症中心利妥昔单抗、环磷酰胺、阿霉素、长春新碱和强的松(RCHOP)治疗PMLBCL的疗效。患者和方法:选取2011年1月至2020年7月接受RCHOP治疗的18岁以上PMLBCL成年患者。回顾性收集所有人口统计学、疾病和治疗相关变量。临床和实验室变量与无进展生存期(PFS)和总生存期(OS)的相关性采用单因素和多因素分析,采用后向逐步Cox回归模型。采用Kaplan-Meier曲线绘制PFS和OS。结果:纳入49例患者,中位年龄29岁。14例(28.6%)为III期或IV期,31例(63.3%)为纵隔肿大。国际预后指数(IPI)为0-1的35例(71.4%)。放疗32例(65.3%)。治疗结束(EOT)完全缓解(CR) 32例(65.3%),部分缓解(PR) 8例(16.3%),进展性疾病(PD) 9例(18.4%)。与未达到4年OS的患者相比,在EOT中达到CR的患者(92.5% vs 26.9%, p= 1)与EOT反应(p=0.009)、PFS (p=0.004)和OS (p= 0.019)相关。结论:在PMLBCL中,RCHOP化疗主干线在一线治疗中效果不佳,但可用于低IPI患者。对于IPI高的患者,可以考虑采用更强化的化学免疫治疗方案。补救性化疗对复发或难治性疾病的疗效有限。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
94
审稿时长
16 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Blood Medicine is an international, peer-reviewed, open access, online journal publishing laboratory, experimental and clinical aspects of all topics pertaining to blood based medicine including but not limited to: Transfusion Medicine (blood components, stem cell transplantation, apheresis, gene based therapeutics), Blood collection, Donor issues, Transmittable diseases, and Blood banking logistics, Immunohematology, Artificial and alternative blood based therapeutics, Hematology including disorders/pathology related to leukocytes/immunology, red cells, platelets and hemostasis, Biotechnology/nanotechnology of blood related medicine, Legal aspects of blood medicine, Historical perspectives. Original research, short reports, reviews, case reports and commentaries are invited.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信