Artificial Intelligence and Cardiovascular Risk Prediction: All That Glitters is not Gold.

IF 3.2 Q2 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS
Mauro Chiarito, Luca Luceri, Angelo Oliva, Giulio Stefanini, Gianluigi Condorelli
{"title":"Artificial Intelligence and Cardiovascular Risk Prediction: All That Glitters is not Gold.","authors":"Mauro Chiarito,&nbsp;Luca Luceri,&nbsp;Angelo Oliva,&nbsp;Giulio Stefanini,&nbsp;Gianluigi Condorelli","doi":"10.15420/ecr.2022.11","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Artificial intelligence (AI) is a broad term referring to any automated systems that need 'intelligence' to carry out specific tasks. During the last decade, AI-based techniques have been gaining popularity in a vast range of biomedical fields, including the cardiovascular setting. Indeed, the dissemination of cardiovascular risk factors and the better prognosis of patients experiencing cardiovascular events resulted in an increase in the prevalence of cardiovascular disease (CVD), eliciting the need for precise identification of patients at increased risk for development and progression of CVD. AI-based predictive models may overcome some of the limitations that hinder the performance of classic regression models. Nonetheless, the successful application of AI in this field requires knowledge of the potential pitfalls of the AI techniques, to guarantee their safe and effective use in daily clinical practice. The aim of the present review is to summarise the pros and cons of different AI methods and their potential application in the cardiovascular field, with a focus on the development of predictive models and risk assessment tools.</p>","PeriodicalId":45957,"journal":{"name":"European Cardiology Review","volume":"17 ","pages":"e29"},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2022-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/d5/ae/ecr-17-e29.PMC9947926.pdf","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Cardiology Review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15420/ecr.2022.11","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

Abstract

Artificial intelligence (AI) is a broad term referring to any automated systems that need 'intelligence' to carry out specific tasks. During the last decade, AI-based techniques have been gaining popularity in a vast range of biomedical fields, including the cardiovascular setting. Indeed, the dissemination of cardiovascular risk factors and the better prognosis of patients experiencing cardiovascular events resulted in an increase in the prevalence of cardiovascular disease (CVD), eliciting the need for precise identification of patients at increased risk for development and progression of CVD. AI-based predictive models may overcome some of the limitations that hinder the performance of classic regression models. Nonetheless, the successful application of AI in this field requires knowledge of the potential pitfalls of the AI techniques, to guarantee their safe and effective use in daily clinical practice. The aim of the present review is to summarise the pros and cons of different AI methods and their potential application in the cardiovascular field, with a focus on the development of predictive models and risk assessment tools.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

人工智能和心血管风险预测:闪光的不一定都是金子。
人工智能(AI)是一个广义的术语,指的是任何需要“智能”来执行特定任务的自动化系统。在过去十年中,基于人工智能的技术在包括心血管疾病在内的广泛生物医学领域越来越受欢迎。事实上,心血管危险因素的传播和经历心血管事件的患者预后的改善导致心血管疾病(CVD)患病率的增加,因此需要精确识别CVD发展和进展风险增加的患者。基于人工智能的预测模型可以克服一些阻碍经典回归模型性能的局限性。然而,人工智能在这一领域的成功应用需要了解人工智能技术的潜在缺陷,以保证其在日常临床实践中的安全有效使用。本综述的目的是总结不同人工智能方法的优缺点及其在心血管领域的潜在应用,重点是预测模型和风险评估工具的发展。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
European Cardiology Review
European Cardiology Review CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS-
CiteScore
5.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
23
审稿时长
12 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信